It's a "True Believers" responsibility to spread the Gospel, not to force people to believe something they don't wish to accept. Becoming a member of the Body of Christ is a Supernatural work of the Holy Spirit. As a believer in the Grace Gospel, my responsibility stops at telling people about the truth of the Gospel. Whether they accept it or reject it is between them and the work of the Holy Spirit. When Christ had His earthly Ministry, some people placed their faith in Him and others did not. It's an individual choice that nobody can make for you. I admit, I don't have all the answers nor do I comprehend all that the Bible teaches. Nobody does. We have to pray and trust that the Holy Spirit will help us to understand what God's Holy written word (The Bible) is trying to teach us. Beware of people who claim to know what the entire Bible is saying, they're lying to you. We learn from the Holy Spirit, God's word (The Bible) and other people. GM...
IS M.A.D. DOCTRINE NECESSARY IN ORDER TO RECEIVE ETERNAL LIFE?
- Thread starter Grosnick Marowbe
- Start date
- Status
heir
TOL Subscriber
Acts 10:35 KJV is what Peter preached in Acts 15 vs. what Paul preached in Titus 3:5 KJV. You know that and ignore it as you do not approve excellent things. Get saved and study!
heir
TOL Subscriber
:chuckle:
Zeke
Well-known member
Yet the real meaning of these differences is found in Galatians 4:20-28, the sons of Hagar flesh and blood birth compared to the spiritual birth of Sarah within, Romans seven deals with this division in us as does Galatians, Dispensationalism is still based on a outward kingdom that is temporal shadows and types of the eternal invisible kingdom of light, IS RA EL concerns our own Conscience. Acts 2,9.13.28, etc.... is still worldly dogma that follows the "foundation of the Roman gospel which is based on an outward sacrifice of temporal" flesh and blood that has nothing to do with the Kingdom Luke 17:20-21. 1Cor 15:1-4 Galatians 3:8 are the same promise which is spiritual not gender or ethnic which is why Jew and Gentile, male or female don't exist when one knows Christ within.
heir
TOL Subscriber
You are too far out dude
Zeke
Well-known member
Only if you haven't discerned "where the Kingdom is located" Heir, Why you can't grasped that Galatians 4:20-28 isn't a reference to two physical siblings but a parabolic/Allegorical teaching concerning our own inner experience shows you haven't grasped the real divisional meaning portrayed in scripture which 2Cor 3:6 Matt 11:11 tells you is the dividing line between the voice of spirit and flesh, secular history of these timeless lessons is false dogma Heir.
heir
TOL Subscriber
"MADists" aren't "unbaptized" for by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body,... (1 Corinthians 12:13 KJV).
We are not "covenant rejecting" as we recognize the NC and who it is with (Jeremiah 31:31-34 KJV, Hebrews 8:8-12 KJV).
Try again!
heir
TOL Subscriber
totally tubular!
beameup
New member
glorydaz
Well-known member
It could certainly lead to a clearer understanding of why there seems to be so many contradictions between the Gospels and what comes after them. Which is what I found to be the case. That in turn can result in a more "fruitful" walk. When the "guilt" is truly lifted, everything changes.
glorydaz
Well-known member
Well, Jesus is the "primary teacher"...the rock upon which Christianity is built. But, I hear what you're saying. Jesus taught the law while He walked this earth...for a PURPOSE. Too many people don't understand what that purpose was. It was what the ascended Lord taught through the Apostle Paul which helps us "graduate" into eternal life.
Zeke comes from, "The Twilight Zone."
Zeke has always been "INSANE."
heir
TOL Subscriber
:up: Many refuse to believe who the Lord was sent to while on earth (Matthew 15:24 KJV) not to mention His sending of the 12 (Matthew 10:5-6 KJV)!
heir
TOL Subscriber
He spiritualizes it all away like a hippie~!
The scripture is clear as to why Paul went there--
Act 15:1 And certain men which came down from Judaea taught the brethren, and said, Except ye be circumcised after the manner of Moses, ye cannot be saved.
Act 15:2 When therefore Paul and Barnabas had no small dissension and disputation with them, they determined that Paul and Barnabas, and certain other of them, should go up to Jerusalem unto the apostles and elders about this question.
Pauls ministry was identical which is why the scripture says--
Gal 1:23 But they had heard only, That he which persecuted us in times past now preacheth the faith which once he destroyed. Gal 1:24 And they glorified God in me.
Do you really believe that the risen Lord taught the 12 Apostles a different gospel to that which He taught Paul?
If you do, and you do then you believe the 12 Apostles are cursed.
Pauls ministry is evidence that all may receive the same revelation from Heaven, and that all apostles since were taught the same way, and also lived and were/are persecuted the same also.
Paul never got in Peters face except concerning his separating himself from the Gentile brethren, to eat with the Jewish brethren.
Something you Madists still try to do in promoting a difference which God does not recognize.
LA
:chuckle:
Stay off that LA Freeway it's bumper to bumper with false doctrine.
Peter and the other Apostles ONLY preached the Kingdom Message to the Jews and NOT to the Gentiles. Whereas, Paul ONLY preached the Grace Gospel that he received through the revelation of Christ Himself, to the Uncircumcised.(Gentiles) Galatians 2:7-8 KJV: “But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter; (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles
.”Peter's mission only included the Circumcised. (The House of Israel) Two different Gospels were being preached. Paul was in no hurry to go and see the other Apostles. Why would he, he didn't learn the Grace Gospel from them, he learned it by the revelation of Christ Himself? Peter didn't really understand Paul's NEW Gospel to the Gentiles. Peter's Gospel was only to the Lost sheep of the House of Israel. Paul's Gospel was different from Peter's and the rest.
If Peter and Paul's Gospel was the same, then, why was it necessary for Peter to ONLY go to the lost sheep of Israel, while Paul was specifically sent to the Gentiles? Matthew 10:5-6 states: "These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Galatians 1:11-18 “But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man. For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ… But when it pleased God, who separated me from my mother’s womb, and called me by his grace, To reveal his Son in me, that I might preach him among the heathen; immediately I conferred not with flesh and blood: Neither went I up to Jerusalem to them which were apostles before me; but I went into Arabia, and returned again unto Damascus. Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter, and abode with him fifteen days.”
[/I]
- Status