:darwinsm:Emo said::noway:
:shocked:
On that note, I am leaving my faith & switching to Hinduism.
:darwinsm:Emo said::noway:
:shocked:
On that note, I am leaving my faith & switching to Hinduism.
Both.The Edge said:Do you mean you hate Bob and your family, or that you and your family all hate Bob?
No. I don't say stop following the guy. But the nicer than God stuff is not right, and that is what I have a problem with. But it's compounded by the fierce devotion to him on this board. That's what freaks me out a little. I know most of what Bob teaches is good, but his style needs a little work, and his style stems from the nicer than God teaching. That's all I have against him. I'm sure he's a good man in general. I'd love to talk to him but not on national radio.Clete said:Why should we? First of all, we aren't guilty of what you accuse us of in this post in the first place and secondly (and more importantly) you've given exactly zero reason why we should. Are we supposed to simply take your word for it? I don't think that's going to happen. Have you offered one single substantive argument to refute any of the myriad of teachings that Bob has available for free on his web site; even one single substantive argument? Just one argument, that's all I want for now. Can you do that or is, "Stop following that guy because his style is too harsh for my taste." as good as you've got?
Resting in Him,
Clete
Okay, this is a reasonable position given the state of the church in this country. I can live with this but since we are on a debate forum how about we debate the whole nicer than God thing rather than trying to make Bob out to be some sort of cult leader when you know he isn't anything of the sort. If you want to see a bunch of people turn on Bob Enyart, let him start, for even one moment, acting like he's the messiah incarnate or some other wacko nonsense like that. I can assure you that Bob would sooner allow himself to be eaten alive by wild dogs before permiting anyone to worship him for even a fraction of a second.The Edge said:No. I don't say stop following the guy. But the nicer than God stuff is not right, and that is what I have a problem with. But it's compounded by the fierce devotion to him on this board. That's what freaks me out a little. I know most of what Bob teaches is good, but his style needs a little work, and his style stems from the nicer than God teaching. That's all I have against him. I'm sure he's a good man in general. I'd love to talk to him but not on national radio.
I know you're not addressing me specifically, but I think we should love one another, as God commanded us. God isn't always nice. In the Old Testament, God killed people, burned a whole city, hardened Pharaoh's heart only to smack him down, destroyed races, and drowned millions of people. Does that mean we have the right to do the same? Certainly not. He is God, we are not. We are not entitled to behave like God. You can argue and quibble all you want about the way Jesus treated people and the way God treats people. However, Jesus was very clear about how we were to behave: Love our enemies, do good to people who hate us, pray for those who curse us.Now, what is it exactly that you don't like about this nicer than God thing? Do you think we should be nicer than God, or don't you think that it is even possible to be nicer than God, or what?
Edge, once again you demonstrate that you are a real jerk. I just told you he accepts emails and off-the-air calls. He also accepts "snail" mail. If he did accept PMs, it would probably be the slowest way to get in touch with him, since he's on TOL infrequently.The Edge said:He doesn't accept PM? So he only talks in public. That is the mark of someone who likes to humiliate.
So you'll only talk in public? Didn't you just say that this is the mark of someone who likes to humiliate?Actually, I shant talk to him on second thought, unless he comes on here.
Before you said, " I am somewhat interested in where he's coming from." :think:There's nothing I could say to make him change his mind.
It's easier to take potshots at someone who isn't around.He has an empire and I'm nothing. I'm just another bug he can squish.
:darwinsm:The Edge said:I agree with spanking children (though not to the extreme that Enyart did)
Exactly! Bob couldn't have said it better himself.Johnny said:I know you're not addressing me specifically, but I think we should love one another, as God commanded us.
We don't have the right to destroy races and cause worldwide floods because we do not have the authority to do those things, not because they are unloving or ungodly.God isn't always nice. In the Old Testament, God killed people, burned a whole city, hardened Pharaoh's heart only to smack him down, destroyed races, and drowned millions of people. Does that mean we have the right to do the same? Certainly not.
We aren't entitled to behave like God? Are you sure you don't want to take that one back? I can establish very easily that the Bible teaches that we are to be immitators of God. I'll wait to do so until you've had a chance to change you mind about this point.He is God, we are not. We are not entitled to behave like God. You can argue and quibble all you want about the way Jesus treated people and the way God treats people. However, Jesus was very clear about how we were to behave: Love our enemies, do good to people who hate us, pray for those who curse us.
Every time someone quotes these verses in this context I just have to scratch my head. I really don't get it. How does this help your case? The only way it would is if you read it as though the words "without cause" weren't in there. But they are in there and so this doesn't help you at all. In fact this is the essence of what Bob teaches. These two verses aren't exactly a nicey nice thing to say to someone. Can you imagine telling your next door neighbor that if he is angry at someone without cause that he is in danger of Hell fire? How "nice" would that be? Not very. And that's just the point Bob is trying to make.In Matthew 5:21-22 Jesus says, "Ye have heard that it was said of them of old time, Thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment: But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire."
Again, I'm scatching my head. By just quoting this passage, you are doing the very thing that you are complaining about Bob doing, are you not?James 3 tells us of the powers of the tongue and warns us about how we use our tongue:
3:1 My brethren, let not many of you become teachers, knowing that we shall receive a stricter judgment. 2For we all stumble in many things. If anyone does not stumble in word, he is a perfect man, able also to bridle the whole body. 3Indeed, we put bits in horses' mouths that they may obey us, and we turn their whole body. 4Look also at ships: although they are so large and are driven by fierce winds, they are turned by a very small rudder wherever the pilot desires. 5Even so the tongue is a little member and boasts great things.
See how great a forest a little fire kindles! 6And the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity. The tongue is so set among our members that it defiles the whole body, and sets on fire the course of nature; and it is set on fire by hell. 7For every kind of beast and bird, of reptile and creature of the sea, is tamed and has been tamed by mankind. 8But no man can tame the tongue. It is an unruly evil, full of deadly poison. 9With it we bless our God and Father, and with it we curse men, who have been made in the similitude of God. 10Out of the same mouth proceed blessing and cursing. My brethren, these things ought not to be so. 11Does a spring send forth fresh water and bitter from the same opening? 12Can a fig tree, my brethren, bear olives, or a grapevine bear figs? Thus no spring yields both salt water and fresh.
Who is your brother in this context?James 4:11 warns us: "Speak not evil one of another, brethren. He that speaketh evil of [his] brother, and judgeth his brother, speaketh evil of the law, and judgeth the law: but if thou judge the law, thou art not a doer of the law, but a judge."
What? You cannot mean this. Do you realize that you have basically just said that God says "Do as I say, not as I do"! That's blasphemy! God does not say one thing and do another. If you think He does, you've misunderstood either His word, or His actions or both.God tells us what is right and wrong. We don't have to and shouldn't infer by His actions.
The Edge said:But it's compounded by the fierce devotion to him on this board...
beanieboy said:This is closer to what I was getting at.
The way people have fierce devotion with him, and often don't even question what he says.
Do people worship Enyart? Well, they don't ask him into their heart, etc. But if one claims to love Jesus, they should see some big contradictions between what Enyart says, and what Jesus says, and to choose Enyart over Jesus...
Well, actions speak louder than words.
Of course we are commanded to be His followers and to imitate Him within the boundaries He sets forth. But no, we don't always have the right or authority to behave like God. You've already admitted to that.We aren't entitled to behave like God? Are you sure you don't want to take that one back? I can establish very easily that the Bible teaches that we are to be immitators of God.
By definition it cannot be ungodly. As to whether or not it is unloving is a different question. Some would argue that God is always loving. Yet He hated Esau, even before Esau was born. There are a few instances of God's hate in the Old Testament. We are commanded to love.not because they are unloving or ungodly.
As I argued with Lighthouse, "without cause" is only included with anger. It is not included with the latter two instances, and I believe for a reason. I've looked at a lot of commentary on this passage and none of them seem to suggest that without cause should be extended to the latter two. Further, some even noted that it is debated whether or not "without cause" is included at all. Some of the newer translations do not include it.Every time someone quotes these verses in this context I just have to scratch my head. I really don't get it. How does this help your case? The only way it would is if you read it as though the words "without cause" weren't in there.
Truely. But those aren't my words and my judgements, those are God's words and God's judgements. Calling someone a moron or insulting someone's intelligence is not speaking the word of God or passing the judgement of God upon them.Can you imagine telling your next door neighbor that if he is angry at someone without cause that he is in danger of Hell fire? How "nice" would that be? Not very. And that's just the point Bob is trying to make.
Christians.Who is your brother in this context?
Clete said:Examples of these so called contradictions, please.
beanieboy said:This is closer to what I was getting at.
The way people have fierce devotion with him, and often don't even question what he says.
Poly said:I'm sick of your lies beanboy! How would you know if anybody has ever accepted what he has to say without questioning it? You absolutely do not. You make false accusations simply because you don't like the man. It's one thing to not like somebody but to be so shallow and low as to say things that you know nothing about is childlike. You whine and you cry that people treat you unfairly. Yet you don't hesitate in being unfair to others by saying things about them that aren't true.
beanieboy said:Does Enyart say that it is okay to hate sinners?
Is this really biblical, or contrary to what Christ says?
Does Enyart say that God's love is conditional - that he only loves Christians, and not the unsaved?
Is this biblical or contrary to what Christ says?
It's not Enyart that I have a problem with. It's that he has many followers that follow what he says, or the twisted things he claims the bible to say, and therefore, twists the hearts of men.
In short, he is a modern day Pharisee, and Jesus was very, very angry at the Pharisees because they were misleading people away from God.
The Edge said:Here's an example..... Jesus says the greatest commandent is love one another, but Enyart says it's ok to mock and insult. And I see a lot of it coming from Enyart followers, much more than love. I guess that's one of the biggest examples. Just look at Turbo's last post #428.
Poly said:All of this is a mere distraction to take the focus off of your lie.
Beanie you said people accept what he says without questioning it which you said they do often. Can you prove this to be true?