We have been down all these roads before. But for one last time for those keeping score.....
1John 3:9 Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.
Whoever sins is a servant of sin (John 8:34) and is of the devil (1John 3:8)
You are reading the wrong mail. 1st John isn't written to the body, it's written to those of the circumcision. And for them they couldn't sin and remain "in Him" therefore if they sinned they would need to once again ask for forgiveness and make sacrifice (this is something that us in the body need not do because our dispensation is different).
To drive this point home notice how the verses in first John are setup.....
1 John 1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. 9 If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. 10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make Him a liar, and His word is not in us. 1 My little children, these things I write to you, so that you may not sin. And if anyone sins, we have an Advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous. 2 And He Himself is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only but also for the whole world.
elohiym, claims he does not sin, so based on the verses above what does that tell us about elohiym? :think:
Notice when they sinned what they needed to do?
"If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness."
In the body our sins are already covered (Romans 4:7) No re-confession necessary!
Jesus said that Satan was a murderer and a liar from the beginning, not that he became one after "falling."
Joh 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
Check the Greek. Beginning means "from his origin."
Satan was a murderer from the beginning. The garden was the beginning. Satan fell in the garden, in the beginning. :duh:
And since we have already been to 1st John, lets revisit that book now! The word for beginning in John 8:44 is the exact same word in 1 John 1:1.....
1 John 1:1 That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, concerning the Word of life 1 John 2:7 Brethren, I write no new commandment to you, but an old commandment which you have had from the beginning. The old commandment is the word which you heard from the beginning.
Now lets ask ourselves,
had they "heard" the word at the moment of their conception???? No! That would be silly!
The Greek word "arche" simply means the beginning, origin, first, of whatever! It can simply describe the beginning of whatever topic is being discussed.
We could have just as easily and accurately said Satan was a tempter from the beginning even though we all agree Satan didn't actually tempt anyone until Adam and Eve.
Your woodenly literally interpretation of John 8:44 is irrational and unbibilical.
Paul used the term "babes in Christ" pejoratively.
1Co 3:1 And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ.
Paul called those "babes in Christ" carnal, which means unconverted. If one is unconverted, one is unsaved, and it really doesn't matter what you want to call yourself (Mat 7:22-23).
That is just plain ridiculous. You cannot read 1 Corinthians without realizing that Paul was speaking to believers. That is why every bible scholar for all of history has interpreted this verse just as written. This one isn't even worth arguing about, it's just plain ridiculous.
That is a lie. I do believe that Satan tempted Jesus, but Jesus was not tempted to do what Satan wanted. I already explained this to you, but you just want to disparage me because it is your nature to do so. You have no freewill to resist doing it.
No, I disparage because you are a moron.
The Hebrew word translated to "Lucifer" is heylel, which means "praise" or "praised. "Therefore, the verse could read: "How art thou fallen from heaven, praised son of the morning!" The verse does not refer to Satan, but to the king of Babylon (Isa 14:4).
Even if that were true that wouldn't erase....
Luke 10:18 And He said to them,
“I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven". That's Jesus speaking. (that's why I posted it in
red)
So, either elohiym is right (Satan didn't fall) or Jesus meant what He said.
The only reason you want to claim that Lucifer and Satan are not the same is because you reject the notion that Satan fell. Which of course is heretical.
Ezekiel 28:12-19 is about the king of Tyre (Ezekiel 28:12).
Anyone can read for themselves Ezekiel 28 and see that it is an illusion to Satan. Again, you are at odds with the text and bible scholars throughout history.
Jesus said that Satan was a murderer from the beginning (John 8:44), and God creates evil according to the scripture...
Isa 45:7 I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.
A more accurate word in Isaiah 45:7 is "calamity"....
Isaiah 45:7 I form the light and create darkness, I make peace and create calamity; I, the LORD, do all these things.’
Although "evil" would work as well I suppose. From the perspective of those being judged for their wickedness God brings "evil" upon them. God isn't saying that He is evil, instead He is saying that He brings judgment upon the wicked of for them it's gonna be "evil". It's no different than when a military official says to his troops "lets give them hell", he isn't saying that they are going to literally bring the enemy hell and be a wicked and evil force. Instead he is saying that the judgment that they will be bringing the enemy will be "like hell" for them.
God is good, not evil.
I'm laughing at you, Knight. You have only proven that you are enslaved to sin and weak.
Laugh all you want.