:think:
How bout:
Whatever the standing is on Cyber Monday of each year with only one subscription, tied to the current winner being in play.
Indiana Woman Fired for Refusing to Issue Same-Sex ‘Marriage’ Licenses Files Suit
- Thread starter Angel4Truth
- Start date
:think:
How bout:
Whatever the standing is on Cyber Monday of each year with only one subscription, tied to the current winner being in play.
How about just a gentleman's bet since this will most likely be going on a while?
:think:
How bout:
Whatever the standing is on Cyber Monday of each year with only one subscription, tied to the current winner, being in play.
So on Cyber Monday if she's won but being appealed then you win.
If she's lost but is appealing I win.
No matter how many times it switches back and forth during the year the bet is tied to the status on Cyber Monday.
Perhaps we should engage an arbiter to split hairs for instance if she's won but there's a stay.
I suggest Town Heretic.
Agreeable?
I do think there be a great distance tween fighting the Lions and filing some paper work.
LOL I dont agree with some of his legal opinions and i know i dont agree with his legal opinon on gay marriage already.
It's not OK to be a homo.
Thanks again.
If we want a New Zealander who lives in Taiwan's opinion on how we do things in the U.S then we can always count on you.
And we do, We really do.
Stay safe friend.
Ok. Suppose you have a muslim who believes only muslims should be allowed to marry. Can they refuse to issue a christian a marriage license? Or do they need to check their religion at the door? Or how about a mormon who believes only mormons should be allowed to get married? How about a christian who believes second marriages should be illegal?
As a government representative you can't use your religion to discriminate against tax payers.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Reasonable accomodations
I agree. I know that's not a popular comparison, but it's certainly relevant.
I believe in scrupulous separation of Church and State. This is a foundation protection for all of us.
Not relevant at all, perversion is chosen, skin color isnt.
God is correct, man isnt.
I don't see how the will of Shiva is relevant to law.
That's why shouldn't allow christians to deny marriage licenses to same-sex couples.
Jose Fly
New member
And that's usually the kicker in these cases. Christians go into them with blinders on, thinking it's only about their religion, their job, and gay couples.
Reality however is that if we allow the followers of one religion to deny public services because of their beliefs, we have to allow the same for believers of other religions.
It's like when Christian groups hand out fliers and other materials in public schools. When they're doing it, it's "freedom of religion" and "freedom of speech", but as soon as another group wants the same privileges, suddenly they're "trying to indoctrinate our children".
Funny how that works.
I'm a Christian and I don't do that.
Christians need not be bothered by what non-Christians are up to.
A secular job requires performing the tasks contained within one's job description. If you have agreed to do the work then do it.