Do you deny the scriptures ?
Of course not.
I deny what John Nelson Darby called a "rapture".
What Darby invented is not in the Bible.
Do you deny the scriptures ?
What is the "catching up"? Start a new thread and tell us all about it.Of course not.
I deny what John Nelson Darby called a "rapture".
What Darby invented is not in the Bible.
What is the "catching up"? Start a new thread and tell us all about it.1Th 4:13-18 KJV But I would not have you to be ignorant, brethren, concerning them which are asleep, that ye sorrow not, even as others which have no hope. (14) For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him. (15) For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep. (16) For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: (17) Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. (18) Wherefore comfort one another with these words.P.S. Who is John Nelson Darby?
I've seen all those arguments by Dispies that claim there were men before Darby who preached the rapture. They are all wrong. None of those men preached, or taught what Darby invented.
It drives Dispensationalists crazy that everything they believe didn't exist before Darby. They have desperately tried to show someone teaching what Darby taught before Darby, but they can't.
If you notice, almost every Dispensationalist on TOL does everything they can to not be associated with Darby. That's because they are embarrassed that everything they believe was invented in the mid 1800's by Darby.
They live in denial.
My understanding of Tetelestaism is that the dead in Christ rose in 70ad and those that were alive and remain (including us) are caught up with them when we die...one at a time. Not together.
I thought Paul said 'together with them'.
Yeah, I think Paul said 'together with them'.
I didn't view this yet, but the title is on the wrong track. The problem with the Ribera eschatology is that it is set in future Israel so that there is no way to consider the Pope to be AC. In several years of reading, I don't remember any accusation that Ribera concocted the rapture.
All Paul mean by referring to that translation event was that Christians alive at the last moment of history will be changed from this life to immortality unlike those who died. Obviously.
Was it invented in 1800?Yes, Tetelestaism is fatally flawed.
Was it invented in 1800?
My understanding of Tetelestaism is that the dead in Christ rose in 70ad and those that were alive and remain (including us) are caught up with them when we die...one at a time. Not together.
:mock:
One at a time LOL. :jolly:
[/INDENT]P.S. Who is John Nelson Darby?
Yes, Tetelestaism is fatally flawed.
You have to adhere to "soul sleep" until the rapture/resurrection for your theory to work.
What is the "catching up"? Start a new thread and tell us all about it.1Th 4:13-18 KJV But I would not have you to be ignorant, brethren, concerning them which are asleep, that ye sorrow not, even as others which have no hope. (14) For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him. (15) For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep. (16) For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: (17) Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. (18) Wherefore comfort one another with these words.
No, some rapture believers are on each side of the debate.
You could not be more wrong. I have never read any JND. I have only heard what some people say about him.That is like a Mormon asking who is Joseph Smith.
No one is ever going to take you serious as long as you keep living in denial.
There is NO time outside the physical world.Not really.
You have to adhere to "soul sleep" until the rapture/resurrection for your theory to work.
You could not be more wrong. I have never read any JND. I have only heard what some people say about him.
You are the type of liar that likes to TRYS to use "quilt by association" even when there is NO association.
That's just plain dishonest on YOUR part.
I would think that someone that names the name of Christ could be better than lie.
There is NO time outside the physical world.
That is why God can see the end from the beginning.
Even "eternity" makes no sense at in all in the context of time.
God has ALWAYS existed. He is not bound by time.