Homosexuality is designed?

Lighthouse

The Dark Knight
Gold Subscriber
Hall of Fame
beefalobilly said:
Well that comment was a joke, although if you look at prison gayness, that's about dominance too, so is that ok? Rape, whether homo or hetero, is about dominance not pleasure..
I did not think you were supporting the idea of homsexuality in animals. I was using what you said as a reference. Dogs do tend to hump anything.

And prison rape has some to do with pleasure, as does other rape. But there is more to do with powere and control [i.e. dominance]. But this is humans we are discussing, in these events, not animals. Morality applies to humans only.
 

Agape4Robin

Member
Lighthouse said:
I did not think you were supporting the idea of homsexuality in animals. I was using what you said as a reference. Dogs do tend to hump anything.

And prison rape has some to do with pleasure, as does other rape. But there is more to do with powere and control [i.e. dominance]. But this is humans we are discussing, in these events, not animals. Morality applies to humans only.
I have to go with :Brandon: on this one.

I know......I was shocked too..... :noway:

:chuckle:
 
Lighthouse said:
I did not think you were supporting the idea of homsexuality in animals. I was using what you said as a reference. Dogs do tend to hump anything.

And prison rape has some to do with pleasure, as does other rape. But there is more to do with powere and control [i.e. dominance]. But this is humans we are discussing, in these events, not animals. Morality applies to humans only.

Yup, I definately agree on morality being applied to humans only, if it was based on animal behaviour we could justify all kinds of things :noway:
 

Greywolf

New member
Sorry for jumping into the discussion so late...

Clete:
Clete said:
It is doing the act of homosexual sex that makes you a homo just as the act of murdering someone makes you a murderer. :duh:

What about someone who is attracted to members of the same sex, but has not had sexual intercourse? Are they a homo? Are you not a "hetero" until you've had sex with someone of the opposite sex?

Clete said:
AIDS is simply a natural consequence of a perverted lifestyle that almost certainly got started because some pevert thought it would be cool to have sex with a monkey.

I'd be interested in a link to your source (and something that you remember hearing on an unknown episode of NOVA isn't a very good source). The most common theory about the origin of HIV is that HIV is a mutation of a virus found in monkeys that probably got transferred by someone eating chimp meat or getting monkey blood in a cut.
http://www.avert.org/origins.htm

Clete said:
As for non-homos the chances of straight men (for example) of getting Breast Cancer (which does happen) is greater than their chances of getting AIDS.

Source?

Clete said:
Further, every single case of AIDS was caused directly or indirectly by contact with a homo. Either the infected person is a homo or they got blood (or some other body fluid) from a homo into their blood stream. NOT A SINGLE CASE OF AIDS HAS EVER BEEN DOCUMENTED TO HAVE BEEN CAUSED IN ANY OTHER WAY.

Completely untrue.
HIV has been transmitted through intravenous drug use.
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pubs/facts/idu.htm
HIV has been transmitted from a mother to her child through breast feeding.
http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/mtct/hivpubmtct/en/
HIV has been transmitted through vaginal intercourse.
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pubs/facts/women.htm

As a matter of fact, heterosexual activity accounts for a majority of HIV transmission in adolescents and women of all ages.
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/graphics/images/l264/l264-4.htm
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/graphics/women.htm

Clete said:
There can be no doubt about it, AIDS is a homo disease.

See above.

Clete said:
Thank you for at least admitting that homos kill people.

Or perhaps it's contracting HIV that kill people... :idea:

Dread Helm:
Dread Helm said:
Females are known to be the weaker sex.

How do you mean? Are they weaker physically? Morally? Intellectually?

Dread Helm said:
Homosexual behavior is destructive. It leads to death.

What do you consider "homosexual behavior"?
 

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
Greywolf said:
Sorry for jumping into the discussion so late...

Clete:


What about someone who is attracted to members of the same sex, but has not had sexual intercourse? Are they a homo? Are you not a "hetero" until you've had sex with someone of the opposite sex?
Matthew 5:28
But I say to you that whoever looks at a woman to lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart.​
By way of principle this verse would apply to the pervert. The point I was making is that in the same way that you cannot criminally prosecute someone for wanting to murder, you cannot prosecute someone for lust. It is only when the desire is acted upon that a crime has been committed (whether the act was successfully carried out or not).

I'd be interested in a link to your source (and something that you remember hearing on an unknown episode of NOVA isn't a very good source). The most common theory about the origin of HIV is that HIV is a mutation of a virus found in monkeys that probably got transferred by someone eating chimp meat or getting monkey blood in a cut.
http://www.avert.org/origins.htm
That is remotely possible but it is such a difficult virus to get that it is more likely that there was sexual contact involved. There are weirdoes who eat freshly dead, uncooked monkeys so I will concede the point and grant you the benefit of the doubt.
And I'm sorry but I don't have an archive of old Nova programs. All I can tell you is that the entire show was about a study that the CDC did which tracked down what they called "Patient Zero". It never made the direct claim that he was the very first HIV infected person (although the NOVA program certainly didn't make a big point in making that clear) but it did establish that this individual had sex with thousands of people mostly in North America and that the majority of the first several hundred AIDS patents had him as a sexual partner. While he may not have been the first AIDS patient or HIV carrier, he was certainly the one who established the virus in the American homo population, so says the CDC, not me.

Look it up. That one should be easy to find.

Completely untrue.
HIV has been transmitted through intravenous drug use.
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pubs/facts/idu.htm
Right! Sharing a needle with a homo can get you infected, that's was what I said.

HIV has been transmitted from a mother to her child through breast feeding.
http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/mtct/hivpubmtct/en/
The Mother got HIV from a homo! You're never more than one iteration away from a homo with HIV (two at the most). I'm not saying it will never happen or that it absolutely never has happened, just that if it has no one has documented it and that it is exceedingly rare to the point of practical nonexistence.

HIV has been transmitted through vaginal intercourse.
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pubs/facts/women.htm
The person who transmitted it was a homo or got it from a homo. Further, vaginal transmission of HIV is quite rare as well. God gave the ladies plenty of protection down there, but I agree it does happen.

As a matter of fact, heterosexual activity accounts for a majority of HIV transmission in adolescents and women of all ages.
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/graphics/images/l264/l264-4.htm
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/graphics/women.htm
Not unless they are having anal sex with homos.


See above.
Exactly.

Or perhaps it's contracting HIV that kill people... :idea:
Nope! It's definitely homoism. The average homo dies in his 40's and if I recall correctly AIDS only slices about 7 years off their normal life expectancy. If I remember the numbers correctly, its 46 and 39; 46 for the non AIDS death of a homo and 39 if they die of AIDS. It's been a long time since I heard this statistic, so don't even ask me for a source. If you're really interested you might call Bob Enyart, I think he actually compiles stats on homos, I do not.
Further, the vast majority of homos were molested as children by other homos. And a great majority of child molesters are homos. Also nearly all serial murders are homos. Further still homos are aggressively hostile toward the family unit which is the foundation of any civilized society. Because of homos, sexual promiscuity is up, therefore adultery is up (this could actually be argued in the opposite direction as well, either way both homos and adulterers should be executed), therefore both divorce and murder are way up, the teen depression rate, suicide rate, and pregnancy rate are all up as a result of the increase in divorce and thus the abortion rate is also up as is the rate of single mothers. Being raised by a single mother is the number one contributing factor of those who end up committing violent crime and end up in prison. And on and on and on I could go. Homos kill people on a scale rivaled only by the likes of Hitler, Stalin and Saddam Hussein. They will destroy this nation from the inside, they will destroy it and you are helping them.

Resting in Him,
Clete
 

phenomenon09

New member
Clete said:
Also nearly all serial murders are homos.

Seriously, stop spitting out ambiguous statistics without backing them up with evidence. http://www.familyresearchinst.org/FRI_EduPamphlet4.html. This website initially seems to support your wild claim, until you consider that homosexuals are castigated by almost every other social group to a level that rivals racist violence in the early 20th century. Now, african-american males comprise a large majority of the US prison population (In New York State more than 90% of people doing time for a drug offense are African American or Latino. There are more blacks and Hispanics locked up in prisons than there are attending the state university system).

The link provided also states the following claim: "A study of 518 sexually-tinged mass murders in the U.S. from 1966 to 1983 determined that 350 (68%) of the victims were killed by those who practiced homosexuality and that 19 (44%) of the 43 murderers were bisexuals or homosexuals."

Ignoring the evidence of data mining used to support this claim, it states that 44% of the studied murderers were bisexual or homosexual. That doesn't seem to fit your categorization of "almost all serial killers."
 

Delmar

Patron Saint of SMACK
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
phenomenon09 said:
That doesn't seem to fit your categorization of "almost all serial killers."
Still a very strong statistical link!
 

Granite

New member
Hall of Fame
"Further, the vast majority of homos were molested as children by other homos."

I'd like to see a source on this. I know it happens, I'd take issue with "the vast majority."

"And a great majority of child molesters are homos."

A "great majority"? Again, a source here.

"Also nearly all serial murders are homos."

This is completely absurd and untrue.

"Further still homos are aggressively hostile toward the family unit which is the foundation of any civilized society."

Some are, some aren't. Some straights are hostile towards the nuclear family, too.

"Homos kill people on a scale rivaled only by the likes of Hitler, Stalin and Saddam Hussein."

:rolleyes:

Mmmmm. The Queer Gulag and Gay Gas Chambers. Musta missed the memo on that one...
 

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
phenomenon09 said:
Seriously, stop spitting out ambiguous statistics without backing them up with evidence. http://www.familyresearchinst.org/FRI_EduPamphlet4.html. This website initially seems to support your wild claim, until you consider that homosexuals are castigated by almost every other social group to a level that rivals racist violence in the early 20th century. Now, african-american males comprise a large majority of the US prison population (In New York State more than 90% of people doing time for a drug offense are African American or Latino. There are more blacks and Hispanics locked up in prisons than there are attending the state university system).

The link provided also states the following claim: "A study of 518 sexually-tinged mass murders in the U.S. from 1966 to 1983 determined that 350 (68%) of the victims were killed by those who practiced homosexuality and that 19 (44%) of the 43 murderers were bisexuals or homosexuals."

Ignoring the evidence of data mining used to support this claim, it states that 44% of the studied murderers were bisexual or homosexual. That doesn't seem to fit your categorization of "almost all serial killers."

I didn't go to any study and I never make stuff up. All I did was to go to a website that was about nothing else but the history of serial murders and read about each one. All but one or two were homos. I even started a thread and posted a lot of the info. I'll see if I can find it and post a link.

Resting in Him,
Clete
 

Granite

New member
Hall of Fame
"A study of 518 sexually-tinged mass murders in the U.S. from 1966 to 1983 determined that 350 (68%) of the victims were killed by those who practiced homosexuality and that 19 (44%) of the 43 murderers were bisexuals or homosexuals."

I find this statement peculiar for a couple reasons: one, I wonder how the author would define a "sexually-tinged" murder, and secondly, a "mass murderer" is NOT a "serial killer." The terms are thrown around and confused pretty often.
 
Top