That's not true and you know it. You have never addressed the verses which I quoted in my initial post on this thread.
Yes, it is. Why do you deny, old, wimpy looking "man," that the Lord Jesus Christ is not God, not a man today, and not our mediator, in "flesh and bones," per Luke 24:39 KJV, Ephesians 5:30 KJV, deny that He was the only sinless person, ever to walk the earth, as you assert that children,and "the virgin Mary," are sinless, identical to the Saviour, and that the "virgin birth/conception," Him being conceived by the Holy Spirit, was/is unnecessary, superfluous, as all children are born sinless, through males, and assert that that "the rapture" is the same thing as the second coming, and was prophesied, in Matthew-John, and in Hebrews-Revelation, as it was not part of the mystery, revealed exclusively to Paul, as you argue, that he was just a flunkie, as there is no difference between prophecy, and mystery, as "it all says the same thing," according to your Acts 2 blender interpretive methodology, as the 12 could have done what Paul did,and why do you assert that men/women, today, are not born in the likeness, after the image of fallen Adam, per Genesis 5:3 KJV, but are born sinless, identical to the Saviour, and why do you butcher/pervert Ecclesiastes 7:29 KJV, that, w/o a doubt whatsoever, when referring to "upright," refers to the LORD God's "pre-fall" creation of Adam/Eve, not us, who are after Adam "post fall" per Genesis 5:3 KJV, which you assert is translated wrong, and why do you assert that Job was a child, when he was discussed in the book of Job, as he was "upright," per your Ecclesiastes 7:29 KJV "verse in isolation" scam, per Job 1:1 KJV, Job 1:8 KJV, Job 2:3 KJV, and why do you deny that you are an Acts 2 Walvoordite/Ironsideite Acts 2 proponent, posing as a mid Acts dispensationalist, and why do you deny that you are a man worshiper, witness your avatar, and spamming what "sir" Robert Anderson, Paul Sadler of the Berean Bible Society,.......................................... .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. ................says, on 1/3 posts, unable to "connect the dots" on your own, missing the "big picture," as you are still in the milk of Acts 2, in childhood, and why do you deny that you are scamming others, with your "post one verse in isolation" deception, ignoring surrounding verses, and ignoring who is being addressed, as you assert that "it all says the same thing?"?
We see that you have no answers, Acts 2 blender, sower of discord amongst the brethren, whose "shtic" on TOL, is misquoting members, misrepresenting others' views, explaining why you've been banned from numerous Christian forums, including
www.christianforums.com.
We see that the admitted bible corrector, is running and hiding.
Frankly, sonny boy, this is all way over your meager understanding so maybe a grown up will actually address what I said here:
In order to examine the results of personal sins in regard to death let us look first at the following verse :
"As for you, you were dead in your transgressions and sins" (Eph.2:1).
Joseph Benson wrote that
"they are under condemnation, on account of their past depravity and various transgressions, to the second death, or to future wrath and punishment, like criminals under sentence of death for their crimes" [
emphasis added] (Joseph Benson,
Benson Commentary on the Old and New Testaments, Commentary at Ephesians 2:1).
In
The Pulpit Commentary we read that
"the death ascribed to the Ephesians in their natural state is evidently spiritual death, and "trespasses and sins," being in the dative seems to indicate the cause of death - 'dead through your trespasses and your sins' (R.V.)" (
The Pulpit Commentary)
Paul also tells the believers at Colosse the following:
"And you, being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, hath he quickened together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses" (Col.2:13).
In
Vincent's Word Studies we read the following:
"In your sins...the dative is instrumental, through or by" (Marvin R. Vincent,
Vincent's Word Studies)
At Colossians 2:13 we read that Paul tells these people that they were dead previously but now have been made "alive with Christ." This can only be speaking of them receiving spiritual life so their death was a spiritual death. So these people died spiritually as a result of their own sin. That means that they were alive spiritually before they sinned because no one can die spiritually unless he is first alive spiritually. And the only possible way that these people were alive spiritually before they sinned is because they emerged from the womb spiritually alive.
That means that no one emerges from the womb spiritually dead and that completely destroys the theory of Original Sin which teaches that all people emerge from the womb spiritually dead. Thomas R. Schreiner is clearly in error when he says that
"all people sin individually because they enter the world spiritually dead on the basis of their union with Adam" (Thomas R. Schreiner,
Adam, the Fall, and Original Sin", 273-74).
These verses by themselves disprove the theory of Original Sin and no one has yet been able to prove anything which I said is in error.
I/others, have addressed it, you habitual liar, but you, as is your MO on TOL, in deceit, say we have not.
You're a deceiving punk, known for lying about what others believe, misquoting others, and satanically accusing others of not addressing what you've said, and then spamming trap questions.
Notice the man worshiper Jer, once again spams what others assert, not being able to connect the dots himself, as in deceit, he posts verses in isolation,and deleting verses preceding/after.
These verses disprove your laughable, silly, satanic theory that the Lord Jesus Christ was not the only sinless person, ever to walk the earth, as you assert that children,and "the virgin Mary," are/were sinless, identical to the Saviour, and disproves your laughable, silly, satanic theory that the "virgin birth/conception," Him being conceived by the Holy Spirit, was/is unnecessary, superfluous, as you theorize that all children are born sinless, through males, and disproves your laughable, silly, satanic theory that men/women, today, are not born in the likeness, after the image of fallen Adam, per Genesis 5:3 KJV, but are born sinless, identical to the Saviour, and disproves your butchering/perverting Ecclesiastes 7:29 KJV, that, w/o a doubt whatsoever, when referring to "upright," refers to the LORD God's "pre-fall" creation of Adam/Eve, not us, who are after Adam "post fall" per Genesis 5:3 KJV, which you assert is translated wrong, and disproves your assertion that Job was a child, when he was discussed in the book of Job, as he was "upright," per your Ecclesiastes 7:29 KJV:.
Genesis-Revelation
no one has yet been able to prove anything which I said is in error.
Yes, we have, deceiver, as this is another example of one of your "assert/declare victory" alleged debate enders, your clown MO on TOL. Come on, old man...Give us another one of them...Give us a "Why should I believe you, instead of Paul????" Give us another "There can be no doubt whatsoever....."
Please, Jer? Teach us? Spam another "Sir whatchacallit says...." Please?
Ephesians 2 KJV
1 And you hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins;
2 Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience:
3 Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were
by nature the children of wrath, even as others.
Jerry post verses, in isolation, again, and deletes verses 2-3.
The bible says, by nature, we are children of wrath=from birth, despite his satanic butchering of what Paul is conveying.
Jerry: An apple tree becomes an apple tree,
only after it produces apples.
Vs.
The Bible: An apple tree produces apples, because it is an apple tree, by nature.
Luke 13:6 KJV He spake also this parable; A certain man had
a fig tree planted in his vineyard; and he came and
sought fruit thereon, and found none.
Matthew 21 KJV
19 And when he saw
a fig tree in the way, he came to it, and
found nothing thereon, but leaves only, and said unto it, Let
no fruit grow on thee henceforward for ever. And presently the fig tree withered away.
Jer: No, "Jesus!!!!" That is not a fig tree!!! There is no fruit, either bad, or good, there is no fruit growing, so it is not!!! It only becomes a fig tree after it produces fruit, either good, or bad, and not by nature!!!!!!
You're a silly, ignorant Acts 2 clown, not in my league, with your perverted "we are all born without sin like the Saviour" made up doctrine of demons.
