At least . . you have an anchor baby :chuckle:Oh you right wing elitists.
Give me your tired, poor, huddled masses
- Thread starter ClimateSanity
- Start date
"Hot dog! I won a million dollars."
exminister
Well-known member
exminister said:
Would you be ok if baseball was outlawed?
What goes around comes around. If we don't allow freedom then yours can be taken away just as easily. It is hatred to only allow your way of thinking, which evolves into MIGHT MAKES RIGHT. That is why the Europeans left and came to American. The bloody wars with Christian fighting Christian over points of doctrine. The founding fathers got sick of that and set up a free society to allow you to believe as you chose. I expect you to not get this as I played off your pie eating, baseball reference.
But what goes around comes around. How much do you love your faith/church? Want it to be outlawed?
Last edited:
exminister
Well-known member
"Hot dog! I won a million dollars."
"A toast to my big brother George: The richest man in town."
As opposed to you, who wants to a Muslim majority to stomp out Christians and Jews.
gcthomas
New member
You are rather dim, Nick.
The absence of a white/christian majority domination of the minorities is just no domination by the majority. And I don't know why you should fabricate false motives for me: I have no problems with Christianity, only with your distorted and overly party political version of it.
BTW, there will be no majority of Muslims in either of our countries for the foreseeable future. It is part of the modern civic pact that there should be no tyranny of the majority over minorities. Majorities must rule with compassion, and not focus only on their own, selfish, partisan interests.
But it's not only MY way of thinking.
It's a whole lot of people thinking that way.
Why should you be allowed to tell me and all those others that we can't think this way?
Why are you trying to suppress us by turning against us, and telling us that it us that needs to change?
The founding fathers set it up so that one had to confess a belief in GOD to hold any public office.
All you are doing is saying your thinking is correct and mine is wrong.
How is that any different from what I am doing?
Why is it wrong for me not to include your way of thinking, but it's right for you not to include my way of thinking?
You are doing the very thing you are complaining about me doing.
Shouldn't minorities do the same?
Or do they automatically get to show no compassion, and focus on their own selfish partisan interests?
Yeppers.
All that "tolerance" of others they preach about goes right out the window if it disagrees with what they want.
Absolutist, Dispensationally Un-Scriptural nonsense is what all that is.
1 Corinthians 5:9 I wrote unto you in an epistle not to company with fornicators: 5:10 Yet not altogether with the fornicators of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or with idolaters; for then must ye needs go out of the world. 5:11 But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat. 5:12 For what have I to do to judge them also that are without? do not ye judge them that are within? 5:13 But them that are without God judgeth. Therefore put away from among yourselves that wicked person.
Rom. 5:8
Acts 17:11,12
There's some irony in your baseball scenario as an example of your very valid points there...
For the full account, click on the link below...
http://theconversation.com/nearly-100-years-ago-baseball-almost-banned-broadcasts-38150
Rom. 5:8
The Alt-New Colossus (second draft)
"Give me your rested, your chic,
Your tanned masses yearning to shop duty free,
Those venture capitalists of your teeming shore.
Send these, the privilegedwhites few to me,
I hold the pass key to our golden door!"
(servants entry around theblacks back)
"Give me your rested, your chic,
Your tanned masses yearning to shop duty free,
Those venture capitalists of your teeming shore.
Send these, the privileged
I hold the pass key to our golden door!"
(servants entry around the
gcthomas
New member
They do generally. The complaint on this thread started with an objection to Muslims using Sharia law to sort out their domestic issues amongst themselves. My objection was to the majority Christians proposing interfering and stopping them from doing things themselves, and keeping them out of the country as a result of them focusing on their own issues.
That's not what it's looking like.
I don't want sharia law being recognized or implemented AT ALL in the USA.
Why on earth would you EVER want a law that FORCES women to do all those horrible things, like being stoned to death, raped, mutilated, or made to cover their entire body?
Not to mention all the horrid things they deem "acceptable" to do to non-muslims.
Sharia law should NOT be allowed in the USA.
I don't want it here, and neither do many others.
And for very good reasons.
gcthomas
New member
Sharia courts would operate like diocesan tribunals and rabbinical courts already do in the US. Should these religious courts be banned for the sake of constitutional equality?
Last edited:
Sharia law should be banned.
Don't support it here.
Don't give it a foothold here.
Get rid of it!!!
Right! The USA law of the land, the Constitution and Sharia Law cannot ultimately coexist. It will be one or the other.
Absolutely.
Foxfire
Well-known member
Find Out If President Trump Would Let You Immigrate to America
http://time.com/4887574/trump-raise-act-immigration/?xid=newsletter-brief
http://time.com/4887574/trump-raise-act-immigration/?xid=newsletter-brief