I'm sorry that you need proof of Muslims celebrating 9/11.
I'd imagine any number of Muslims were happy about 9/11. What I asked you for was for a citation to source on the photo. A way to establish its legitimacy in relation to its claim.
A picture will not do, and a source will not either.
The picture doesn't have any context that supports the claim written into it. I can't look at the crowd and tell where it was taken, when it was taken, or the religious views of those people in it. That's why I asked for context. Because reasonable people do that sort of thing, fail to simply assume it is what it is advertised as because someone said it and posted it on the internet.
Nothing will, because you all are in denial about the people you defend.
See, this is why I ask for source and cite, because someone as comfortable with making things up about strangers to suit his bias as you've shown yourself to be, again, can't be trusted to see a truth outside of it.
Liberals declared it an 'outrageous claim', not because it isn't a statistically probable and even inevitable occurrence that would stem from such an event
At the risk of repeating myself, what proof can you offer that either of those assumptions are true? Understand the occurrence we're talking about would need to be taking place where Donald said it did and where state police said it didn't. Thousands of people congregating to celebrate the falling buildings. It simply didn't happen there, or anywhere in this country.
because you liberals are just dishonest, politically correct sheeple.
Rather, it's dishonest to mischaracterize others, as you have here. Or, just keep digging that bias blind hole for yourself. I'm no more a liberal than you are a fan of proving your case or offering verifiable data. I only look like a liberal to someone who isn't really listening. Now all sorts of people looked into that claim and none of them produced any corroboration. Not everyone looking was a liberal, or a moderate, or even of the sort who hoped it wasn't true.
There's no point in sharing information with any of you.
It's not "information". It's a photograph and another in a series of claims you've made without supporting them in any way that allows objective, independent confirmation.
You ever thought THAT might be the reason Trump didn't produce the damn photo, or why the claim was never authenticated?
No, because I don't make claims about facts without having the facts available. And when you have the truth of a thing, a truth that doesn't rely on emotions and can be seen by anyone who looks at it, that's what you present.