:idunno:
Homosexuality has only recently become legal in this country (it still remains illegal in many states, although largely unenforced). Are saying that you like it better now than the way it was in the past?
Why should I do your heavy lifting? If you think homosexuality has been a benefit to this country that's also unsubstantiated so maybe you can go "beyond the rhetoric"?
I don't think you're going to find that the founding fathers addressed homosexuality in the constitution or even federal law. Laws concerning homosexuality tend to be state laws.
the only question is what punishment fits the crime?
Is that how you answer a question? With another question?
work on your reading comprehension.
I agree that it's scary. I was appalled when I read this piece of crap. The arrogance of some never ceases to amaze me.
OK, good, we are making progress.
Because the burden of proof lies with the one who makes the claim.
Yes, I think you are wrong. We do not live in a theocracy like Iran no matter how much you may wish we did. The bible may say that homosexuality is wrong, but that is God's law and it is his to punish as he sees fit. In reality, consensual homosexuality, even if viewed as a crime is a victimless one, just like heterosexuality.
I don't need a hint, especially so since your's was pointless. Knight claimed, or at least inferred, that the founding fathers found homosexuality criminal. If they followed English law, one could assume they did, if they followed Napoleonic law, they may not have, BUT, they never addressed it in the constitution or in federal law. They left it up to the states to address as they saw fit.
Well how about all the little girls raped by adult men? How about female school teachers molesting young boys in their charge? Am I to understand you feel that is OK since it's heterosexual? Please tell me you're not really a Dr.