Cities Across America Creating Rainbow Crosswalks to Celebrate ‘LGBTQ Pride’

[dodge]

=rexlunae;5047578]Then what's the problem. You are a self-admitted homophobe. Why are you so resistant to being clear about it?

The correct words are queer and homosexual NOT gay.

The rain bow is a promise from God not to flood the world again NOT a queer sign.

The words the homosexual world "steal" and pervert changes nothing they will answer to God on the last day.

It's a game of calling a thing by a word that aptly describes it. You seek to obfuscate and normait is lize your bigotry.

Again those trapped in the perversion do NOT get to re-define the words to placate the brain dead not happening.

 

[annabenedetti]

The correct words are queer and homosexual NOT gay.

The rain bow is a promise from God not to flood the world again NOT a queer sign.

The words the homosexual world "steal" and pervert changes nothing they will answer to God on the last day.

Again those trapped in the perversion do NOT get to re-define the words to placate the brain dead not happening.

Gays can use the word gay if they want to. And they can use a rainbow if they want to. And there's not a thing you can do to stop it.

 

[dodge]

Gays can use the word gay if they want to. And they can use a rainbow if they want to. And there's not a thing you can do to stop it.

The perverts can do as they please that does nor mean I have to accept or acknowledge it now does it.

My faith is in God not the perverts or the lost that promote and accept their perversion and there is not one thing YOU can do about it.

 

[chair]

... You assume, without any form of justification, that you can equate the texts of the Bible with the unambigious word of God. That is where the turning off of the brain occurs in you right wing extremist evangelicals, you ignore hundreds of years worth of biblical scholarship and textual studies...

here is the heart of fundamentalist mistake. The idea that the Bible is the Word of God (TM).

 

[Selaphiel]

Believing scripture is "begging the question" for those that live in open rebellion against God like those in SSM or those that advocate for SSM.

When push all knowledge we have about the Bbile and the texts contained in it to preserve a naive belief, that is willful ignorance. Is the Bible excempt from rational criticism? If so, why? If you say: "Because it is the word of God", then you have to establish that it really is the unambigious direct word of God.

No harm ? Other than those in SSM will spend eternity in hell if they do not repent. You are no friend of those involved in SSM you help them get comfortable in their sin and rebellion against God.

What hateful nonsense. So you cannot actually provide a rational reason for same sex marriages being immoral except "God says it is". So God is essentially a tyrant to inflict eternal punishment on those who goes against his arbitrary whims, with no rhyme or reason? And you worship this being? Sounds like an enlarged boy with a magnifying glass that is burning ants for fun. You may fantasize about them burning in hell for all eternity, but that really says a whole lot more about you than them.

You are being obtuse. God condemned "both" men and men and women and women. You might consider a reading comprehension course.

It is a legitimate question. My reading is supported by people who were near contemporaries with Paul, Justin Martyr being one example.

The empty rhetoric is YOU justifying sin which God has condemned and judged.

No empty rhetoric is you claiming to be the representative of God himself, refusing to listen to any objections against your downright idolatrous view of the Bible. You are a text book example of a biblicist, one who turned the literal text of the Bible into an idol. Why are you so scared of reason?

 

[glassjester]

...or aversion. You collosal dunce. Google it.

So what? Every heterosexual person has an aversion to homosexuality.

 

[Nihilo]

If you want to diagnose the fundamentalists' problem then you have to recognize that they are members of the Church who are in rebellion against the Pastors™ of the Church™. Pastors™ are mentioned in Sacred Scripture as overseers, elders, and bishops, and among all the Pastors™ they are all equal, and the Apostles are first, and among the Apostles Peter is first. And the Church™ is Jesus Christ's Church™, mentioned in Matthew 16:18 (KJV) when He called her "My Church;" His Church is the Church™, the pastors of His Church are the Pastors™ of the Church™. Non-Catholic Christians are in rebellion against the Pastors™.

 

[rexlunae]

So what? Every heterosexual person has an aversion to homosexuality.

What makes you think that?

 

[glassjester]

What makes you think that?

Are you heterosexual?

 

[ok doser]

a·ver·sion əˈvərZHən/ noun noun: aversion; plural noun: aversions a strong dislike or disinclination.

rex - do you have a strong disinclination toward homosexuality?

 

[ClimateSanity]

What makes you think that?

If they didn't, that would make them homosexuals.

 

[glassjester]

If you want to diagnose the fundamentalists' problem then you have to recognize that they are members of the Church who are in rebellion against the Pastors™ of the Church™. Pastors™ are mentioned in Sacred Scripture as overseers, elders, and bishops, and among all the Pastors™ they are all equal, and the Apostles are first, and among the Apostles Peter is first. And the Church™ is Jesus Christ's Church™, mentioned in Matthew 16:18 (KJV) when He called her "My Church;" His Church is the Church™, the pastors of His Church are the Pastors™ of the Church™. Non-Catholic Christians are in rebellion against the Pastors™.

What's with the TM's?

 

[Nihilo]

What's with the TM's?

Chair put one on the Word of God™, I'm just following suit.

 

[Rusha]

The whole basis of homosexual life consists of disgusting despicable and heinous sex acts

How do you know this? I personally have no idea what heterosexual and homosexual couples do in the privacy of their own bedrooms ... because frankly, I don't want to know.

 

[Nihilo]

How do you know this? I personally have no idea what heterosexual and homosexual couples do in the privacy of their own bedrooms ... because frankly, I don't want to know.

It's what I'm calling "bonoboism" and you can study what bonobos do wrt SSB from a biologist's or general scientist's perspective if you or anybody needs to know, without doing something really unnerving and searching for gay porn, a phrase that I debated about censoring because it's so personally distasteful for me to type it out. Even though it's about wild animals ("the natural man" 1Co2:14KJV, if you will), this Wikipedia entry is racy and unnerving for some people to read, but if you can stomach it, you'll know more specifically about some of what people who are passionately against tolerating SSB are talking about. :idunno:

 

[rexlunae]

Are you heterosexual?

Yup.

 

[glassjester]

How do you know this? I personally have no idea what heterosexual and homosexual couples do in the privacy of their own bedrooms ... because frankly, I don't want to know.

If you are heterosexual, then literally any sexual act that a homosexual couple could commit - you'd be repulsed at the thought of engaging in, yourself.

 

[rexlunae]

If they didn't, that would make them homosexuals.

That's not how it works.

 

[glassjester]

Yup.

Are you averse to homosexual activity?

 

[glassjester]

It's what I'm calling "bonoboism"

They're not all bad. Kanzi, the bonobo, learned to play Pacman.