Christian Man Asks Thirteen Gay Bakeries To Bake Him Pro-Traditional Marriage Cake

TracerBullet

New member
According to how the law reads , perhaps. According to reality, that is just not true.

You confuse discernment with prejudice and discrimination

of course it's true. I know a woman who came out as bisexual and spent a month being harassed, insulted and belittled by her supervisor. It was demanded that she quit, she refused. ( We live in one of those states where such behavior is perfectly legal.) She came into work one day to find her supervisor holding a piece of paper saying that this was her letter of resignation and they have accepted it. Security was on hand to escort her off the property. She lost her job and has no legal recourse thanks to something you pretend doesn't exist
 

resodko

BANNED
Banned
In 29 states a person can be fired ...




good :)


burn-at-stake.jpg
 

resodko

BANNED
Banned
of course it's true. I know a woman who came out as bisexual a pervert and spent a month being harassed, insulted and belittled by her supervisor. It was demanded that she quit, she refused. ( We live in one of those states where such behavior is perfectly legal.) She came into work one day to find her supervisor holding a piece of paper saying that this was her letter of resignation and they have accepted it. Security was on hand to escort her off the property. She lost her job and has no legal recourse thanks to something you pretend doesn't exist




ficksed that for ya! :thumb:
 

Jedidiah

New member
?????????? You said it "is a bad law". That's a matter of opinion.


Again, no one is forcing Christians to do anything. If a fundamentalist Christian baker can't serve the public, then why is he opening a business?


Of course I feel I'm in the right. And our society agrees with me.


Wow...you sure do read a lot more into a simple wedding cake than is actually there.


Religion is also a protected class under anti-discrimination laws. So a gay baker can't refuse to bake a cake for a Christian either.


To serve Christians? Of course not.


And you miss the entire legal point.


Not in this case. Just as I think it's wrong for a banker to refuse to give home loans to gay couples, I think it's wrong for a baker to refuse to bake wedding cakes for gay couples.
You're either unbelievably dishonest, or you're a retard. :idunno:
 

The Barbarian

BANNED
Banned
GO writes
The favorite method of liberals is lying about facts until they convince people that the lies are the facts.

Given your recent outing, you should be very quiet when people talk about liars.
 

bybee

New member
Sex has a role in pair bonding in humans as well as many other species. Did you think that sex was only for reproduction?

There are any number of ways to entertain oneself. That is one's own business.
I wasn't addressing that.
I was addressing the idea that "you can't change the facts".
 

gcthomas

New member
There are any number of ways to entertain oneself. That is one's own business.
I wasn't addressing that.
I was addressing the idea that "you can't change the facts".

You brought up anatomy. Which facts were you referring to?
 

bybee

New member
You brought up anatomy. Which facts were you referring to?

Well, to be blunt, the rectum was designed by nature to be a receptacle for waste which is then evacuated from the body. it's action is downward not upward.
Again, the ways in which consenting adults seek to entertain themselves is their own business.
 
Last edited:

gcthomas

New member
Well, to be blunt, the rectum was designed by nature to be a receptacle for waste which is then evacuated from the body. it's action is downward not upward.
Again, the ways in which consenting adults seek to entertain themselves is their own business.

"Designed by nature" rarely produces a single function, and never defines the morally acceptable uses. The human fist, for example, is unique not only for the opposable thumb that allow the grasping of weapons, but also in the buttressed structure it gives for punching, so these are both acceptable uses for hands?

Moral arguments from claimed natural function are weak arguments.
 
Top