[Lon;4953938]What are you asking? 1 Corinthians 4:7? I think you mean 'part.' We believe, or at least I believe, I called on the Name of the Lord.
I am glad to hear you say this. Many other Calvinists here seem to almost deny the conversion experience, though Luther and Calvin did not. It seems that these people's minds are fixed on what went on in the mind of God "before the foundation of the world" to the neglect of how they are choosing to live and walk with Him in the here and now.
When I have asked about the "sheep" are I am told that they are a pre-determined class of people. However in Matthew 25 Jesus identifies such people as those who have actively loved and served "the least of His brothers" during their lives on earth. This was why these people ultimately i
nherited eternal life. He does not identify His sheep by their predetermined status in the mind of God though if that were the central reason for their fate He certainly would have said so.
This does not mean that we should go out and do good works
in order to get eternal life. The sheep were quite unaware of just when they had fed, clothed and visited the Lord. Their actions came out of the relationship of love, faith and obedience they had with the Vine. I do not know about others but I personally have no confidence in my own ability to be like Christ but by abiding in Him his Life produces the image in and through me. Though "without Him we can do nothing" mankind is not totally helpless. At any time any one of us can receive the grace God has extended to us and receiving that help is not the same as performing meritorious works to earn salvation.
As far as the thief on the cross, a lot of theology has been based on a man about whom we know very little. Faithfulness in the relationship we have is the criteria by which God will judge us not the quantity of our good works. On the other hand, dead faith, like all dead things is inactive and produces nothing worthwhile.
Calvinism is mostly a negation of 'me' concerning the work of God, and an emphasis on the Lord Jesus Christ as saving. Because we view our Salvation as monergists, we believe we have nothing and can do nothing without Christ. Colossians 1:17 and John 15:5 coupled with 1 Corinthians 4:7 means any response is also enable and prompted by Him. I know there is a conundrum, and I at one time mistakenly believe I had to do my part either and both to become saved and then to keep salvation. Now when I'm older, I'm not even sure much of it is my part. I can't take any credit for my salvation lest Christ's work become insufficient and I try to feebly add to it. We are saved by grace, through faith, and this not of yourselves. Let me ask, does Ephesians 2:8-10 mean the day we became saved only (and if so, how come? What would suggest it in the passage?)? Or is it rather all of Salvation? Doesn't the former make Christ's work only sufficient to the day I called and then the rest is up to me? How do I keep track of whether I've kept it or lost it? If I've lost it, can I get *it back?
The "helpless" aspect of our experience has to do with our "inability" to produce spiritual fruit
independently from Him. This does not mean we are unable to make choices like "yielding our members to Him (
Romans 6:13, Galatians 5:25) This "walk" of yielding is a continuation of that very first step we took when we first came to know Him (
Colossians 2:6). This abiding relationship means obeying Christ from day to day while continuing to depend on Him for the power to do so(
Phil 2:13)
My son-in-law has attempted to use the old reductio ad absurdum argument, asking me if I happen to tell a lie or stub my toe and curse, am I lost? If so, do I need to be saved again? Well in the parables and the Epistles we see that it is not the commission of a single sin that causes a believer to be disinherited but falling into habitual unrepentant lifestyle of sin.
This is clear in the John's writing when he differentially uses
present tense Greek verbs which denote
ongoing activity and
aorist verbs which are used for
single acts. Hebrews gives many warnings to believers not to harden their hearts so they will not end up falling into sin and from there into unbelief. Even Luther and Augustine retained the idea of apostasy which is what all the ECF before them had taught. In undermining that teaching Calvin opened the door for antinomianism which I see being played out all the time.
*It is really Him. Salvation is found in Him. His actions have saved me.
As for works: I believe a new creation produces fruit in keeping with that nature. Ephesians 2:10 says "His" workmanship. I appreciate a zealous desire to love the Lord and believe it too a part of a new nature for desire, but I believe perfect Love according to 1 John 4:18 is an altogether different reason for the desire. Look too, to the parable of the unfruitful tree. Luke 13:6-9 The tree is made for fruit, but it up to the Gardener to cause its growth. The nature of a tree is to produce in keeping with its nature. Perseverance of the Saints, as I understand it, is about God's work in us, rather than us trying in light of Ephesians 2:10 Notice the reluctance of the orchard owner to cut down the tree. God knows the nature of His new creations. The thief on the cross had no works or fruit produced. He was with the Lord Jesus Christ in Paradise. -Lon
God IS patient, just and loving. God as Calvin conceived Him, is angry with people arbitrarily not because
they have rejected HIM but because
He has first rejected THEM. For example, by interpreting Esau (in Romans 9) to be emblematic of all unregenerate men it follows that God
hates the majority of all human beings who have ever lived. Even while they are in the womb, before they know anything,
most people are pre-selected to be shaped by God's hands into vessels of wrath. The purpose of this is supposedly so that God can demonstrate His power by venting His anger on people whom He never gave grace to, who could not have chosen redemption anyway because Christ never died for them. The God you have come to know in your personal life has more love and justice than the one Calvin conceptualized to fit into his system.