Yes, I agree with this myself but there is something missing - the reason WHY GOD hates the non-elect! To say HE created them hateful and hated them for what HE created them to be is a blasphemy against HIS loving righteousness.
is only a problem if birth is their creation but IF they were created pre-earth and chose by their free will to sin so that they were born sinful when the Son of Man sowed them into the world, then where is the problem?
You, sir, are remarkably consistent with your beliefs. I have to respect that. Still I do not think we need to wrap our minds around the idea of God hating Esau. The Bible also says:
"If a man have two wives, one beloved, and another hated, and they have born him children, both the beloved and the hated; and if the firstborn son be hers that was hated: Then it shall be, when he maketh his sons to inherit that which he hath, that he may not make the son of the beloved firstborn before the son of the hated, which is indeed the firstborn: But he shall acknowledge the son of the hated for the firstborn, by giving him a double portion of all that he hath: for he is the beginning of his strength; the right of the firstborn is his." (Deuteronomy 21:15-17)
We cannot infer from this that God is okay with men hating their wives. Then there is the statement by Jesus:
"If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple." (Luke 14:26).
I do not think Jesus is telling us that we have to literally hate our parents in order to follow Him.
The explanation comes from the Hebrew/Aramaic roots of their language. In this I am going to cite a page dealing with the subject:
...Biblical Hebrew lacks the necessary language to exactly define the comparative sense, i.e., 'more than' or 'less than'. Instead it tends to express two things which may be comparatively of different degree like 'first' and 'second' as extremes such as 'first' and 'last'. In this way love and hate whilst appearing as opposites may in fact be related but lesser terms such as 'love more' and 'love less'.
http://www.biblicalhebrew.com/nt/lovehate.htm
The idea is "preference" or favoritism and there is no question that Jacob and his line were favored over Esau. To understand the full context we have to also remember that Paul begins Romans 9 with a discussion of God's election of Israel for chosen nation status. Paul begins by lamenting the unbelief of the majority of his fellow Jews (
Romans 9:1-4). Then he lists all the blessings they had been given (
Romans 9:4-5) . In
Romans 9:11-13) he continues discussing the God's sovereign selection of Jacob rather than Esau. The fact that he is talking less about them as individuals than about the peoples or nations that came FROM them can be seen by looking back to the scriptures he is citing:
…22 But the children struggled together within her; and she said, "If it is so, why then am I this way?" So she went to inquire of the LORD. 23 The LORD said to her, "
Two nations are in your womb; And
two peoples will be separated from your body; And one people shall be stronger than the other; And the
older shall serve the younger." (
Genesis 25:22-23)
The "older shall serve the younger" part of this prophecy did not happen during the lives of the two men. Only much later did the
nation that came from Jacob,
Israel, become strong enough to subdue the
nation that from Esau,
Edom.
The other scripture being quoted here was written some 1500 years after this one.
…2 "I have loved you," says the LORD. But you say, "How have You loved us?" "Was not Esau Jacob's brother?" declares the LORD. "Yet
I have loved Jacob; 3 but
I have hated Esau,
(
Malachi 1:2-3)
This scripture speaks of how God chose Israel favoring it over Edom. It also speaks of Edom (the nation that came from Esau) which is just about to fall into judgment (a second time). That it is speaking of an earthly nation and an earthly judgement can be seen in the rest of the verse:
...and I have made his mountains a desolation and appointed his inheritance for the jackals of the wilderness." 4 Though Edom says, "
We have been beaten down, but we will return and build up the ruins"; thus says the LORD of hosts, "They may build, but I will tear down; and men will call them the wicked territory, and the people toward whom the LORD is indignant forever (
Malachi 1:3-4)
We can see here that it was the arrogance of Edom that eventually caused them to be judged. They were not condemned because of some prenatal ill will on the part of God. Both God's justice and his patience with this nation is evident, without having to rely on a belief in the pre-existence of soul an idea that was condemned as heretical by the early Church.
Grace and peace