Mr. 5020
New member
:chuckle:BillyBob said:You think my ego needs boosted? :chuckle:
Just in case, you know? Everybody needs a boost now and then.
:chuckle:BillyBob said:You think my ego needs boosted? :chuckle:
We didn't have IR last year? I think we did.BillyBob said:Hey Doc, last year we did away with the option of having our players listed as 'Injured' and instead raised the roster limit to 23. Is that going to be the same this year? [The 'Rules' say something entirely different than how we played last year]
No, we didn't.drbrumley said:We didn't have IR last year? I think we did.
Let me check it out. Everything is set, so if someone has an illegal lineup, that's thier fault.Mr. 5020 said:No, we didn't.
Also, doc, I noticed when looking at the previews, that there are a few teams that say they have Illegal Lineups, though their active lineups are legal. I think all of them were a result of having 3 total QB's.
drbrumley said:We didn't have IR last year? I think we did.
I put the cap on QB's to 3. There isn't that many QB's in the league to start though. I guess I can bump it to 4 but that's it.Mr. 5020 said:No, we didn't.
Also, doc, I noticed when looking at the previews, that there are a few teams that say they have Illegal Lineups, though their active lineups are legal. I think all of them were a result of having 3 total QB's.
OK, I think I remember now, the IR thing initially was for those players who were hurt and not playing in a game. That was too hard to keep track of and was abused sometimes unintentially. Last year, we did away with it.BillyBob said:We dropped the IR and extended our lineup to 13 Reserve positions. I remember having this discussion last year, there may still be a thread with your decision posted....
BillyBob said:We dropped the IR and extended our lineup to 13 Reserve positions. I remember having this discussion last year, there may still be a thread with your decision posted....
Knight said:This whole issue shows why the IR thing is useless.
Why not just expand the rosters to 23 and be done with it.
Or, make the rosters be 20 and be done with it.
The IR thing is gay. :flamer:
BillyBob said:I like 23.
Knight said:Me too.
Lucky said:Me too. It gives coaches room for their regular backups, and a few spots for those low-profile players with potential to increase in fantasy value later in the season.
drbrumley said:20 it is.
Lucky said:20 or 23?
drbrumley said:Oops, darn. typo. 23
drbrumley said:And thats my final answer LOL!!!!
drbrumley said:But then it was voted upon at the end of last season to make the roster 20. Right?
I remember that it was in this thread, but it won't let me search for "IR" because it's too short of a word, and I'm not about to read 186 pages.drbrumley said:13 reserves it is, since I can't prove there was a vote. I remember it though. That should teach me to delete league votes on the Fantasy Site.
Do what you gotta do, doc.drbrumley said:Ok, there is a situation that has developed.
I'm going to have to delete everything in this league transactions wise. I have copied everything and will re-enter everything. It seems some trades will not go thru because according to CBS, the draft is still in progress. So I have to delete all rosters and put them back in.
So in the mean time, I shut off the trades and add/drops for the time being. They will be back up when i'm finished.
Sorry for the incoveince this may cause.