ECT Your Own Opinion Is Worthless

[Squeaky]

Did you notice the words, compare idiot.

Let the reader understand ... Idiot by definition. When a person meets these requirements then are they and "Idiot"

An idiot, dolt, or dullard is an intellectually disabled person, or someone who acts in a self-defeating or significantly counterproductive way. Archaically the word mome has also been used. The similar terms moron, imbecile, and cretin have all gained specialized meanings in modern times. An idiot is said to be idiotic, and to suffer from idiocy. A dunce is an idiot who is specifically incapable of learning. An idiot differs from a fool (who is unwise) and an ignoramus (who is uneducated/an ignorant), neither of which refers to someone with low intelligence. In modern English usage, the terms "idiot" and "idiocy" describe an extreme folly or stupidity, and its symptoms (foolish or stupid utterance or deed). In psychology, it is a historical term for the state or condition now called profound intellectual disability.

Maybe "Idiot" is like implied profanity or profanity.​

I said
Where did you come up with your definition?

 

[Psalmist]

I said
Where did you come up with your definition?

Idiot.

Wikipedia or maybe Wiki-idiot-pedia

I thought for sure you would have Googled it to see whose telling the truth or if I'm lying about my post.​

 

[Squeaky]

Did you notice the words, compare idiot.

Let the reader understand ... Idiot by definition. When a person meets these requirements then are they and "Idiot"

An idiot, dolt, or dullard is an intellectually disabled person, or someone who acts in a self-defeating or significantly counterproductive way. Archaically the word mome has also been used. The similar terms moron, imbecile, and cretin have all gained specialized meanings in modern times. An idiot is said to be idiotic, and to suffer from idiocy. A dunce is an idiot who is specifically incapable of learning. An idiot differs from a fool (who is unwise) and an ignoramus (who is uneducated/an ignorant), neither of which refers to someone with low intelligence. In modern English usage, the terms "idiot" and "idiocy" describe an extreme folly or stupidity, and its symptoms (foolish or stupid utterance or deed). In psychology, it is a historical term for the state or condition now called profound intellectual disability.

Maybe "Idiot" is like implied profanity or profanity.​

I said
I really would like to know where you got that definition. This is what strongs dictionary has. In the definition it appears that "unlearned" is part of idiot. But the main word is "idiot".

2399 idiotes (id-ee-o'-tace);

from 2398; a private person, i.e. (by implication) an ignoramus (compare "idiot"):

KJV-- ignorant, rude, unlearned.

 

[Aimiel]

He got it from Wikipedia. You should read more.

 

[quip]

Your own opinion is really worthless. Human wisdom is vainity. If your not getting verses guiding you. your worshiping in the flesh, not in the Spirit.

Considering your opinions regarding God.....that's rather self defeating.

/next

 

[Desert Reign]

Your Own Opinion Is Worthless

I presume this is your own opinion?

 

[Psalmist]

I said
I really would like to know where you got that definition. This is what strongs dictionary has. In the definition it appears that "unlearned" is part of idiot. But the main word is "idiot".

2399 idiotes (id-ee-o'-tace);

from 2398; a private person, i.e. (by implication) an ignoramus (compare "idiot"):

KJV-- ignorant, rude, unlearned.

Wikipedia. I posted that the first time.

I am familiar with Strongs as well.
​

 

[Squeaky]

Idiot.

Wikipedia or maybe Wiki-idiot-pedia

I thought for sure you would have Googled it to see whose telling the truth or if I'm lying about my post.​

I said
Let me get this straight. You went to Wikipedia and tried to use it as an authority over a bible dictionary. There isn't even any common sense to that move. Wikipedia, websters, funk and wagnal, these are all carnal dictionaries. We are talking about the bible. The bible has its own dictionaries. Strongs, nelsons.
The bible dictionaries go deeper than the carnal dictionaries. But the revelations of Jesus Christ even go deeper than the bible dictionaries and carry much more authority.

 

[Squeaky]

He got it from Wikipedia. You should read more.

I said
lol I would be going backwards.

 

[Squeaky]

Wikipedia. I posted that the first time.

I am familiar with Strongs as well.
​

I said
let me ask you then. If you know strongs, why in the world would you use Wikipedia as an authority against the bible dictionary?

 

[Aimiel]

I said
Let me get this straight. You went to Wikipedia and tried to use it as an authority over a bible dictionary. There isn't even any common sense to that move. Wikipedia, websters, funk and wagnal, these are all carnal dictionaries. We are talking about the bible. The bible has its own dictionaries. Strongs, nelsons.
The bible dictionaries go deeper than the carnal dictionaries. But the revelations of Jesus Christ even go deeper than the bible dictionaries and carry much more authority.

Squeaky,

Wikipedia has much more depth than you imagine. It's dynamic and reflects current language usage and today's nomenclature.

 

[Aimiel]

I would be going backwards.

Sorry, but if you were to read, study or go to classes like I suggested: you could only grow in knowledge and wisdom, since you have next-to-none.

 

[Squeaky]

Squeaky,

Wikipedia has much more depth than you imagine. It's dynamic and reflects current language usage and today's nomenclature.

I said
Now your using carnality as an authority over the bible. you really have lost it.

 

[Squeaky]

Sorry, but if you were to read, study or go to classes like I suggested: you could only grow in knowledge and wisdom, since you have next-to-none.

I said
lol Is that what you have been doing. Making everything carnal an authority over the Word of God.
The first time you took a run at me, remember. You had afew verses of the Word in you. You haven't go squot now.

 

[Bright Raven]

I said
lol Is that what you have been doing. Making everything carnal an authority over the Word of God.
The first time you took a run at me, remember. You had afew verses of the Word in you. You haven't go squot now.

The only reason that we "take a run a you" is to try to get you on the right track for you at the moment are completely lost.

 

[Aimiel]

Now your using carnality as an authority over the bible. you really have lost it.

That's your opinion.

 

[Aimiel]

Is that what you have been doing. Making everything carnal an authority over the Word of God.
The first time you took a run at me, remember. You had afew verses of the Word in you. You haven't go squot now.

You haven't any squot, either, whatever that is. I have Scripture backing me up, though. :duh:


Yes, I do admit: I study The Word of God.

Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.

You don't study because you already know everything. I will not ever know everything, in this life or the next. You don't know what The Word of Truth is, much less how to rightly divide It.

 

[Squeaky]

The only reason that we "take a run a you" is to try to get you on the right track for you at the moment are completely lost.

I said
lol Now be honest. The reason you take a run at me is pride. I can prove you wrong

 

[Bright Raven]

I said
lol Now be honest. The reason you take a run at me is pride. I can prove you wrong

That is really funny. :rotfl:

 

[Squeaky]

That's your opinion.

I said
That's right. But I'm not the one claiming things about God that cant be proven. You are.