Confirmed, again. Pate'solution to the sin/sins issue, is not that Christ died, in our place, to take the just,deserved condemnation of us, in our place, for breaking His own good, holy, spiritual law, thus committing sins, which is the transgression of the law, and results in a sin debt/penalty, his satanic "solution," is to destroy, make void the law, so that there is no sin debt, no condemnation for which Christ might die, in our stead-"for."He denies substitutionary atonement, thus his satanic "vicarious lawkeeping" doctrine of demons.
Thus, Pate, on record, asserts that Christ did not die for our sins.
He won't touch this-watch.
As asked, over 100 times, Pate:
-If the law was abolished 2000+ years ago, then how can Christ die for your/our sins/sib debt, when you assert that there is no longer any law, that defines sin/transgression, and thus no sin debt for which he must die?
-If the law was abolished 2000+ years ago, and you assert, on record, that you commit sins daily,then how can that be, when you assert that there is no longer any law, that defines sin/transgression, and thus no sin which you can commit? If there is no sin debt, that you "owe," and that the solution is to destroy the law, so that you cannot be condemned/judged for breaking a non existing law(your solution), tell us how Christ died for your sins?
-Did Christ die for your sins, Pate? What objective standard defines those sins that you commit? It cannot be the good, holy, spiritual law of God, as you assert that the Lord Jesus Christ made it void 2000+ years ago.
ANSWER YOUR OWN ARGUMENT, pope Pate.
