No problem with the 'opening' to the Koran..............
No problem with the 'opening' to the Koran..............
Nope.
The classic definition proves that he is lord of the demons, and, as well know, this is the same title as Satan.
Regarding Holy Quran, Al-Fatihah 1.2 -
I see no problem here apart from what you're reading into the text, by your own theological bias and antagonism towards Islam. Out of 18 translations given on this site
here, there is only one that renders a translation similar to yours which includes in parenthesis about 'mankind, 'jinn' and all that exists. - this is merely a paraphrased descriptive ADDED to the verse.
Hilali/Khan**
All the praises and thanks be to Allah, the Lord of the Alameen (mankind, jinns and all that exists).
Note that this site says of this particular source -
** - Read with caution - These Translations, specially those which are marked here with
**, are considered either incorrect, far-fetched, non-conforming or misleading. For all translations, care must be exercised for certain verses or an alternate translation should be considered.
All other standard translations render Allah as the Lord (or Sustainer/Provider) of worlds, the universe, all being, all creation, etc. -
there is no specific indication of the word 'jinn' in this passage,
other than the 'assumption' that Allah ('God') would naturally as Lord of all, be the Lord of all beings,...this includes jinn, angels, demons, elves, fairies, pixies, gnomes, elementals, - ALL BEINGS. (paraphrasing here for emphasis).
'God' is the original Creator and Lord of all that exists. Clear?
There is absolutely NOTHING in this passage that demeans, devalues or discounts 'Allah' or associates 'Allah' as 'Satan',.....
nothing but what you're reading into the passage which is not the accurate, traditional or orthodox reading of it.
Concerning 'Alamin' (plural of alam) - this refers to not only animate beings but all creation, all animate and inanimate, so naturally includes man, angels, jinn, heavenly bodies, sun, moon, stars, etc.
See commentary
here
No problems here. :idunno: