Once again, Little Johnny W the Darby follower twists what I said.
The context was the events of 70AD.
Chronological order isn't important for the events that took place in 70AD because some of them took place at the same time.
ECT Why preterism can never be taken seriously by Bible believers
- Thread starter musterion
- Start date
Once again, Little Johnny W the Darby follower twists what I said.
The context was the events of 70AD.
Chronological order isn't important for the events that took place in 70AD because some of them took place at the same time.
Go look for yourself. I don't know how to do searches with this new TOL.
Who will be the first Darby follower to answer the question?
Here is the question:
Are there any prophecies in the Bible that describe the destruction to the Second Temple in 70AD?
Here is the question:
Are there any prophecies in the Bible that describe the destruction to the Second Temple in 70AD?
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
"Chronological order isn't important,...Maybe...I don't know....technically saved....I don't know....Not one person in the history of the universe knows the answer to my questions....AD 66, AD 70...it's not important.....I was a dispensationalist for 25 years, 27 years....It's not important....I don't know...Maybe........Darby...."-Tellalie
@ STP
It depends if the word "then" means after the Tribulation, or if it means during those days.
"and then" could mean the same thing as "these last days", or it could mean after the Tribulation.
It depends if the word "then" means after the Tribulation, or if it means during those days.
"and then" could mean the same thing as "these last days", or it could mean after the Tribulation.
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
You said "after". I know what after means.
As we see, every Russell, Hannegraaf, King, Josephus, Gentry.... follower has avoided the question, for 3 years.
Here is the question one more time:
Identify this "everyone" that allegedly saw/witnessed an invisible/un-physical Saviour, return in AD 70.
Will any Josephus follower, like Craigie, attempt to answer the question?
As we see, not one Darby follower will answer the question.
Why is that?
Darby followers claim to be experts, but when asked to defend their Dispensationalism, they run and hide, or attack the person asking the question.
Here is the question:
Are there any prophecies in the Bible that describe the destruction to the Second Temple in 70AD?
Why is that?
Darby followers claim to be experts, but when asked to defend their Dispensationalism, they run and hide, or attack the person asking the question.
Here is the question:
Are there any prophecies in the Bible that describe the destruction to the Second Temple in 70AD?
I'm telling you right now what I believe.
It could be after, or it could be describing what took place during those days, which means it didn't have to be after.
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
Constantly moving goal posts, constantly changing definitions...so goes a debate with a preterist.
Because you take everything literally
People who take that verse literally use it for post tribulation claims
That's what Totten does with it
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Once again, little arms Craigie spams his weasel, effeminate wimper, Catholic "Hail Mary."
"Chronological order isn't important."-little chin weasel Craigie
I'm not moving anything
Why won't you answer my question?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
Most people take chronology literally.
Was the Revolutionary War before the War of 1812?
You're so smart.
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
I recommend increased protein and 35-40 chinups three times a week to correct Tet's biceps problem.