Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 5

[Kit the Coyote]

Wow, Tim Cook actually thinks that God made him with perverse desires. It appears that either Tim Cook likes to mock God like so many of his fellow proud and unrepentant homosexuals do or has absolutely no understanding of Holy Scripture.

In any event, Tim Cook is one of many people in high profile positions that is leading a nation astray, children included (Psssst, Tim: God doesn't take kindly to your kind).

The Human Rights Campaign, founded by pederast Terry Bean, thinks highly of the way Tim Cook runs Apple, hence giving Apple a 100 score on their 2018 Corporate Index Rating.

Speaking of gay CEOS here is another
Alan Joyce

CEO of Quantas Airlines.

Openly gay he sets a fine example for having been in a committed relationship with his partner for over 20 years.

 

[Kit the Coyote]

Oh and Kit, you're in a safe haven here. If you think for a second that you'd be banned for blasphemy (saying that Jesus Christ/the Son of God/God in the flesh is a pervert), one of TOL's most popular members stated that "Jesus approved of loving homosexual relationships".

That is a position taken many of the LGBT friendly Christian denominations.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Oh and Kit, you're in a safe haven here. If you think for a second that you'd be banned for blasphemy (saying that Jesus Christ/the Son of God/God in the flesh is a pervert), one of TOL's most popular members stated that "Jesus approved of loving homosexual relationships".

That is a position taken many of the LGBT friendly Christian denominations.

Thanks for acknowledging that it's not my imagination, Oh and Kit: "LGBT friendly" and "Christian denominations" in the same sentence is an oxymoron.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Wow, Tim Cook actually thinks that God made him with perverse desires. It appears that either Tim Cook likes to mock God like so many of his fellow proud and unrepentant homosexuals do or has absolutely no understanding of Holy Scripture.

In any event, Tim Cook is one of many people in high profile positions that is leading a nation astray, children included (Psssst, Tim: God doesn't take kindly to your kind).

The Human Rights Campaign, founded by pederast Terry Bean, thinks highly of the way Tim Cook runs Apple, hence giving Apple a 100 score on their 2018 Corporate Index Rating.

Speaking of gay CEOS here is another
Alan Joyce


CEO of Quantas Airlines.

Openly gay he sets a fine example for having been in a committed relationship with his partner for over 20 years.

So for 20 years Alan and his proud and unrepentant sexual deviant lover have gone to their local health clinic together to get tested for the various diseases that run rampant amongst homosexuals? (Now that's love).

I think that you showing financially successful homosexuals (they're failures when it comes to doing what's right for themselves and for humanity) could have a positive effect here on TOL:

Arthur Brain might eventually come out and admit the obvious. Granted, Arthur isn't CEO material, but I bet that he is the best doggone hair dresser in Madison Wisconsin, and that's something that Arthur should be proud of!

Heck, maybe you'll even admit that there is a bit more to your story than looking at the male underwear section in the soon to be defunct Sears catalogue.

Isn't that what "Gay Pride!" is all about Kit?

 

[Kit the Coyote]

So for 20 years Alan and his proud and unrepentant sexual deviant lover have gone to their local health clinic together to get tested for the various diseases that run rampant amongst homosexuals? (Now that's love).

Yes, it is. Now for the diseases, if they are in a committed relationship they only need to be tested once. Everything else they deal with through education and the annual doctor's visits everyone should be having.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
So for 20 years Alan and his proud and unrepentant sexual deviant lover have gone to their local health clinic together to get tested for the various diseases that run rampant amongst homosexuals? (Now that's love).

Yes, it is. Now for the diseases, if they are in a committed relationship they only need to be tested once. Everything else they deal with through education and the annual doctor's visits everyone should be having.

Do you ever tire of lying Kit?


All sexually active gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men should be tested regularly for STDs...
https://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/STD.htm

If you need me to copy and paste the definition of "All" Kit, I will gladly do so.

Now if Alan Joyce and what'shisname only cuddle and/or kiss like Alan Turing must have done with his 19 year old boy toy, then they probably don't need to "get tested".

But then that wouldn't make them "real homosexuals" would it Kit?

 

[Kit the Coyote]

All sexually active gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men should be tested regularly for STDs...
https://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/STD.htm

If you need me to copy and paste the definition of "All" Kit, I will gladly do so.

It is good general advice but I think the writer overlooked the possibility of monogamous relationships. Diseases cannot crop up where there is no exposure. That is high school level biology. From the CDC's perspective aiming at the larger overall group, it is simpler and safer to just say all.

Now if Alan Joyce and whatshisname only cuddle and/or kiss like Alan Turing must have done with his 19-year-old boy toy, then they probably don't need to "get tested".

But then that wouldn't make them "real homosexuals" would it Kit?

Misrepresenting what I said again, do you ever get tired of lying? Actually, from what I've read so far of Turing's personality and the relationship with this young man, I wouldn't find it surprising if that is all they did. But all we know for sure so far is that there was no evidence of buggery.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior

All sexually active gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men should be tested regularly for STDs...
https://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/STD.htm

If you need me to copy and paste the definition of "All" Kit, I will gladly do so.

It is good general advice but I think the writer overlooked the possibility of monogamous relationships.

The pro homosexual Centers for Disease Control most definitely would have mentioned that so-called "monogamous relationships" amongst homosexuals weren't a risk factor if that were the case. One must remember that monogamy also has a different meaning in the sexually perverse homosexual culture.

Take for instance Dan Savage:

...Dan Savage, America’s leading sex-advice columnist, would say. Although best known for his It Gets Better project, an archive of hopeful videos aimed d at troubled gay youth, Savage has for 20 years been saying monogamy is harder than we admit and articulating a sexual ethic that he thinks honors the reality, rather than the romantic ideal, of marriage. In Savage Love, his weekly column, he inveighs against the American obsession with strict fidelity. In its place he proposes a sensibility that we might call American Gay Male, after that community’s tolerance for pornography, fetishes and a variety of partnered arrangements, from strict monogamy to wide openness.
Savage believes monogamy is right for many couples. But he believes that our discourse about it, and about sexuality more generally, is dishonest. Some people need more than one partner, he writes, just as some people need flirting, others need to be whipped, others need lovers of both sexes. We can’t help our urges, and we should not lie to our partners about them. In some marriages, talking honestly about our needs will forestall or obviate affairs; in other marriages, the conversation may lead to an affair, but with permission. In both cases, honesty is the best policy.
https://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/03/magazine/infidelity-will-keep-us-together.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IE8ZbC1lVY

Diseases cannot crop up where there is no exposure. That is high school level biology. From the CDC's perspective aiming at the larger overall group, it is simpler and safer to just say all.

You're well aware when blood, semen and/or feces mix, the opportunity for disease is extremely high. We've been over the health risks of homosexual behavior numerous times, but I understand that you must stick to your marching orders that you received from

"After the Ball..."

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Now if Alan Joyce and whatshisname only cuddle and/or kiss like Alan Turing must have done with his 19-year-old boy toy, then they probably don't need to "get tested".

But then that wouldn't make them "real homosexuals" would it Kit?

Misrepresenting what I said again, do you ever get tired of lying? Actually, from what I've read so far of Turing's personality and the relationship with this young man, I wouldn't find it surprising if that is all they did. But all we know for sure so far is that there was no evidence of buggery.

I can see it now: Alan Turing instead of chemical castration decides to go to prison instead:

Convict to Turing: "What cha in for?"

Turing: "Cuddling with a 19 year old male".

Pederast* Alan Turing was charged with a lesser crime than sodomy because the evidence obviously wasn't there that sodomy took place between 41 year old Alan Turing and the 19 year old lad, but that by no means doesn't mean that Turing and the kid didn't partake in sodomy (because that's what homosexuals do).

*For every 19 year old Alan Turing sodomized, you can bet there were a few 12-15 year old's in the proverbial woodpile as well.

 

[Kit the Coyote]

Take for instance Dan Savage:

Savage believes monogamy is right for many couples. But he believes that our discourse about it, and about sexuality more generally, is dishonest. Some people need more than one partner, he writes, just as some people need flirting, others need to be whipped, others need lovers of both sexes. We can’t help our urges, and we should not lie to our partners about them. In some marriages, talking honestly about our needs will forestall or obviate affairs; in other marriages, the conversation may lead to an affair, but with permission. In both cases, honesty is the best policy.[/I]

You will note he doesn't rule out monogamy and even says it is right for many couples. Yes, it is a lot harder than we would like. Note that this applies to all relationships not just homosexuals.

You're well aware when blood, semen and/or feces mix, the opportunity for disease is extremely high.

And you are well aware since your own favorite source the CDC confirmed it, the disease has to be present in one of the participants in order to be transmitted. You can ignore basic biology all you want but it won't change that fact.

I can see it now: Alan Turing instead of chemical castration decides to go to prison instead:

Convict to Turing: "What cha in for?"

Turing: "Cuddling with a 19 year old male".

Pederast* Alan Turing was charged with a lesser crime than sodomy because the evidence obviously wasn't there that sodomy took place between 41 year old Alan Turing and the 19 year old lad, but that by no means doesn't mean that Turing and the kid didn't partake in sodomy (because that's what homosexuals do).

So you are confirming what I said, thank you.

And you also already acknowledged the figures posted before that not ALL homosexuals engage in buggery as you like to call it.

*For every 19 year old Alan Turing sodomized, you can bet there were a few 12-15 year old's in the proverbial woodpile as well.

Fine, let me know when you have something other than your prejudice to prove it.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Take for instance Dan Savage:
...Dan Savage, America’s leading sex-advice columnist, would say. Although best known for his It Gets Better project, an archive of hopeful videos aimed d at troubled gay youth, Savage has for 20 years been saying monogamy is harder than we admit and articulating a sexual ethic that he thinks honors the reality, rather than the romantic ideal, of marriage. In Savage Love, his weekly column, he inveighs against the American obsession with strict fidelity. In its place he proposes a sensibility that we might call American Gay Male, after that community’s tolerance for pornography, fetishes and a variety of partnered arrangements, from strict monogamy to wide openness.

You will note he doesn't rule out monogamy and even says it is right for many couples.

It appears that you (purposely) missed the gist of the article and video. Sexual infidelity (according to Dan Savage, who is an icon in the homosexual so-called "community") is an honorable reality.

Yes, it is a lot harder than we would like. Note that this applies to all relationships not just homosexuals.

Why is monogamy so important in behavior and hence a lifestyle that is built on a lie? Homosexual so-called "love" isn't really love, it's a façade to cover up the abuse and hence lack of love that the male or female homosexual didn't receive as a child. If you read any of the posts talking about Adolf Hitler, you'd have seen that he had an abusive father and an overbearing mother. Hitler, like so many other homosexuals, went from male to male looking for love that was never there. Some claim that they've found it, but they know that they're lying to themselves. Just ask any EX homosexual, they'll tell you the truth.

Ex-gay man: ‘Homosexuality is just another human brokenness’

Dean Bailey, 50, is not afraid to tell anyone he is living proof that ‘sexual orientation’ can in fact be changed. But he prefers to use the word ‘restored’ rather than ‘changed.’
Bailey remembers how from an early age he felt different from other boys. He felt he did not fit in and thought of himself as awkward, out of place. He remembers never feeling treasured or affirmed by his dad who was an alcoholic and who consumed pornography. Bailey believes this began a pattern of turning to other males to find the affirmation he never received from his dad...As he grew older, the sexual acts Bailey performed with other boys became as a source of comfort to him, making him believe he was being loved and accepted. But while such acts would make him feel good for a while, he says they were never able to help him overcome the constant theme of emptiness and brokenness he felt inside.
Read more: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/ex-gay-homosexuality-is-just-another-human-brokenness


Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
You're well aware when blood, semen and/or feces mix, the opportunity for disease is extremely high.

And you are well aware since your own favorite source the CDC confirmed it, the disease has to be present in one of the participants in order to be transmitted. You can ignore basic biology all you want but it won't change that fact.

Homosexual public enemy #4 (Paul Cameron) explains it well in his article, which I shared a couple of pages back.

The Medical Consequences of What Homosexuals Do.
http://www.biblebelievers.com/Cameron2.html

If you would like to attempt to refute anything that Cameron has written in his stomach turning article, please attempt to do so.

Which reminds me: We haven't talked about Kevin "fistgate" Jennings...

yet.

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
I can see it now: Alan Turing instead of chemical castration decides to go to prison instead:

Convict to Turing: "What cha in for?"

Turing: "Cuddling with a 19 year old male".

Pederast* Alan Turing was charged with a lesser crime than sodomy because the evidence obviously wasn't there that sodomy took place between 41 year old Alan Turing and the 19 year old lad, but that by no means doesn't mean that Turing and the kid didn't partake in sodomy (because that's what homosexuals do).

So you are confirming what I said, thank you.

And you also already acknowledged the figures posted before that not ALL homosexuals engage in buggery as you like to call it.

It's been well established by the so-called "community" that you represent that Alan Turing was a practicing homosexual, be it a buggerite or the other disgusting practices that homosexuals partake in. Don't dishonor his LGBT martyr status by pretending that he wasn't "a real homosexual".

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
*For every 19 year old Alan Turing sodomized, you can bet there were a few 12-15 year old's in the proverbial woodpile as well.

Fine, let me know when you have something other than your prejudice to prove it.

I'm speculating based on the pederasty of other homosexual icons:

Harvey Milk, Terry Bean (who founded the Human Rights Campaign, the most powerful homosexual organization in the world), former Seattle Mayor Ed "the ped" Murray, etc. etc. etc.

 

[Kit the Coyote]

It appears that you (purposely) missed the gist of the article and video. Sexual infidelity (according to Dan Savage, who is an icon in the homosexual so-called "community") is an honorable reality.

That is his opinion but even he admits that it is not for everyone and that there are people who prefer monogamy.

Why is monogamy so important in behavior and hence a lifestyle that is built on a lie? Homosexual so-called "love" isn't really love, it's a façade to cover up the abuse and hence lack of love that the male or female homosexual didn't receive as a child.

Even if that is true of some relationships it is a ridiculous generalization to say that it applies to all. There are homosexual couples who engage in a committed monogamous relationship who say that they love each other. I've listed one just a few posts ago. I have no reason to believe your clearly bias opinion over theirs.

If you read any of the posts talking about Adolf Hitler,

I read the wiki article on Hitler's sexuality. The only evidence to the claim that he was a homosexual comes from his political enemies and a man paid by the Allies to claim he was a homosexual for propaganda purposes. The majority of historians, dismiss the claim. There is evidence that he had several female lovers one of which bore him a child but no evidence of male lovers.

Dean Bailey, 50, is not afraid to tell anyone he is living proof that ‘sexual orientation’ can, in fact, be changed. But he prefers to use the word ‘restored’ rather than ‘changed.’
Bailey remembers how from an early age he felt different from other boys. He felt he did not fit in and thought of himself as awkward, out of place. He remembers never feeling treasured or affirmed by his dad who was an alcoholic and who consumed pornography. Bailey believes this began a pattern of turning to other males to find the affirmation he never received from his dad...As he grew older, the sexual acts Bailey performed with other boys became a source of comfort to him, making him believe he was being loved and accepted. But while such acts would make him feel good for a while, he says they were never able to help him overcome the constant theme of emptiness and brokenness he felt inside.
Read more: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/ex-gay-homosexuality-is-just-another-human-brokenness

Good for him. It is again through a generalization to try to apply his experience to all gay relationships. Life is more complicated than your stereotypes.

Homosexual public enemy #4 (Paul Cameron) explains it well in his article, which I shared a couple of pages back.

The Medical Consequences of What Homosexuals Do.

If you would like to attempt to refute anything that Cameron has written in his stomach turning article, please attempt to do so.

I have acknowledged before that certain sex acts have higher risks involved with them but even Cameron's article supports my position. In each place where he is describing the risks, he refers to the "germs carried in the blood". If the germs are not there, the disease cannot be transmitted. Again, basic biology you want to attribute magical properties to gay sex for some reason.

I'm speculating based on the pederasty of other homosexual icons:

Harvey Milk, Terry Bean (who founded the Human Rights Campaign, the most powerful homosexual organization in the world), former Seattle Mayor Ed "the ped" Murray, etc. etc. etc.

And we have established there are other homosexuals who are not pederasts. The entire point of the posts I have been making is to show for every name you dredge of a bad homosexual, I can find an example of homosexuals who are good members of the community and not pederasts or pedophiles. Homosexuals are no different than any other community, they all have good and bad apples in the mix.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
It appears that you (purposely) missed the gist of the article and video. Sexual infidelity (according to Dan Savage, who is an icon in the homosexual so-called "community") is an honorable reality.

That is his opinion but even he admits that it is not for everyone and that there are people who prefer monogamy.

Dan Savage is an icon in the homosexual movement. Besides being a sought after Christian hating bigoted lecturer, He'd been invited to Obama's White House and was Grand Marshal in 2011 of the NYC march of the moral degenerates parade, the largest 'gay' pride parade in the world. While I realize that it's your job to make homosexuality look good (per your training from reading "After the Ball...") and borrow off of portions of Judeo-Christian doctrine, Dan Savage speaks for the vast majority of the homosexual movement.



Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Why is monogamy so important in behavior and hence a lifestyle that is built on a lie? Homosexual so-called "love" isn't really love, it's a façade to cover up the abuse and hence lack of love that the male or female homosexual didn't receive as a child.

Even if that is true of some relationships it is a ridiculous generalization to say that it applies to all. There are homosexual couples who engage in a committed monogamous relationship who say that they love each other. I've listed one just a few posts ago. I have no reason to believe your clearly bias opinion over theirs.

A lie is a lie. Trying to ignore that lie doesn't make it less of a lie.


Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
If you read any of the posts talking about Adolf Hitler,

I read the wiki article on Hitler's sexuality. The only evidence to the claim that he was a homosexual comes from his political enemies and a man paid by the Allies to claim he was a homosexual for propaganda purposes. The majority of historians, dismiss the claim. There is evidence that he had several female lovers one of which bore him a child but no evidence of male lovers.

A lot of time and effort went into researching the homosexuality of Adolf Hitler and those who surrounded him in the Third Reich. While wiki is a good source for many things, amongst other things it doesn't mention that young Adolf Hitler was arrested for male prostitution by the Munich police. Like so many homosexuals do, Adolf Hitler had a deep hatred of himself and he used the power of government to hurt others.

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Dean Bailey, 50, is not afraid to tell anyone he is living proof that ‘sexual orientation’ can, in fact, be changed. But he prefers to use the word ‘restored’ rather than ‘changed.’
Bailey remembers how from an early age he felt different from other boys. He felt he did not fit in and thought of himself as awkward, out of place. He remembers never feeling treasured or affirmed by his dad who was an alcoholic and who consumed pornography. Bailey believes this began a pattern of turning to other males to find the affirmation he never received from his dad...As he grew older, the sexual acts Bailey performed with other boys became a source of comfort to him, making him believe he was being loved and accepted. But while such acts would make him feel good for a while, he says they were never able to help him overcome the constant theme of emptiness and brokenness he felt inside.
Read more: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/ex...man-brokenness

Good for him. It is again through a generalization to try to apply his experience to all gay relationships. Life is more complicated than your stereotypes.

Those in homosexual so-called "relationships" aren't interested in the truth; if they were, they like so many EX homosexuals have done, would attempt to seek it.


Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Homosexual public enemy #4 (Paul Cameron) explains it well in his article, which I shared a couple of pages back.

The Medical Consequences of What Homosexuals Do.

If you would like to attempt to refute anything that Cameron has written in his stomach turning article, please attempt to do so.

I have acknowledged before that certain sex acts have higher risks involved with them but even Cameron's article supports my position. In each place where he is describing the risks, he refers to the "germs carried in the blood". If the germs are not there, the disease cannot be transmitted. Again, basic biology you want to attribute magical properties to gay sex for some reason.

The point of my posting Cameron's article again is to show that in order to contract certain extremely harmful and sometimes deadly sexually transmitted diseases, one (or both) of the participants in the homosexual act don't have to be infected with any disease (the mixture of blood, urine, semen and feces brings about disease).


Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
I'm speculating based on the pederasty of other homosexual icons:

Harvey Milk, Terry Bean (who founded the Human Rights Campaign, the most powerful homosexual organization in the world), former Seattle Mayor Ed "the ped" Murray, etc. etc. etc.

And we have established there are other homosexuals who are not pederasts.

Sigh, if only one would step forward and tell the readers of this thread that they aren't.

The entire point of the posts I have been making is to show for every name you dredge of a bad homosexual, I can find an example of homosexuals who are good members of the community and not pederasts or pedophiles. Homosexuals are no different than any other community, they all have good and bad apples in the mix.

I didn't bother to take the time and effort to research your supposedly 'respectable' homosexual icons, so it's not known what dirty little secrets these proud and unrepentant moral degenerates are hiding.

That being said: Even if they don't currently or haven't in the past sexually molested youth, they molest youth's minds through indoctrination. If you need reminding, I'll gladly go back to our

Dear Uncle Kit scenario.

While I would love to continue to chat, there's much more work to be done. Did I mention that a homosexual senator from California wants to take even more parental rights away?

That story and more coming up....

 

[Kit the Coyote]

It appears that you (purposely) missed the gist of the article and video. Sexual infidelity (according to Dan Savage, who is an icon in the homosexual so-called "community") is an honorable reality.

So for anyone interested in the full detail of Savage's views and beliefs on the infidelity and the importance of realistically viewing the subject as a means of preserving committed loving marriages, I recommend reading this article from NYT's Mark Oppenheimer on his discussions with him on the subject as well as counter views. It is rather long and I don't see it as practical to cut and paste enough to cover it all. He is not glorifying infidelity but saying that marriages and other committed long-term relationships that deal with infidelity in an open realistic manner will be more likely to survive such issues than if they ignore them.

https://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/03/magazine/infidelity-will-keep-us-together.html

A lie is a lie. Trying to ignore that lie doesn't make it less of a lie.

And applying generalized stereotypes to an entire group of people who number in the millions is itself a lie even if they apply to some.

A lot of time and effort went into researching the homosexuality of Adolf Hitler and those who surrounded him in the Third Reich. While the wiki is a good source for many things, amongst other things it doesn't mention that young Adolf Hitler was arrested for male prostitution by the Munich police. Like so many homosexuals do, Adolf Hitler had a deep hatred of himself and he used the power of government to hurt others.

Time and effort alone do not make research accurate. In a case where the research is being conducted by individuals paid to find a specific finding for propaganda purposes, it only makes it worse.

The point of my posting Cameron's article again is to show that in order to contract certain extremely harmful and sometimes deadly sexually transmitted diseases, one (or both) of the participants in the homosexual act don't have to be infected with any disease (the mixture of blood, urine, semen, and feces brings about disease).

OMG! You really do believe that homosexual sex has magic powers! :rotfl:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! That the santorum (thank for reminding about Dan Savage) of homosexual sex can create spontaneous life and virus that didn't exist!!! Someone call the Nobel committee! Some 200 years after the hypothesis of spontaneous generation was thought disproven, we have found a magic process to create STDs that didn't exist from inert materials!!!!!! You have managed to overturn all of modern medicine and biology!!! OMG!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, Please stop I can't take any more. :rotfl:

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
It appears that you (purposely) missed the gist of the article and video. Sexual infidelity (according to Dan Savage, who is an icon in the homosexual so-called "community") is an honorable reality.

So for anyone interested in the full detail of Savage's views and beliefs...

Should check out his sex column "Savage Love" at TheStranger.com. If you really want to know what the face of sexual perversion and HATRED of God looks like, this is it:

I talked quite a bit about Dan "U" Savage! in earlier threads. He gives credit to a Catholic Priest for his "coming out" (i.e. Dan Savage was raped by one of the many homosexual Priests in the Catholic Church and hence contracted homosexual desires). I gave him the name of Dan "the doorknob licker" Savage because when sick with the flu, he licked the doorknob at Ralph Reed's office of the Christian Coalition. What really disgusted me was when Brian Brown of the National Organization of Marriage went to Savage's house and had dinner and then debated him. Brown treated the sexual degenerate with respect instead of exposing him for the pervert that he is, and it helped defeat the traditional marriage cause in WA State because of that (I hope Brown brought his own silverware...)

In any event, I'm glad that you're acting like Dan Savage is some kind of decent human being instead of saying that he represents the far out fringe of the LGBT movement. Like I said before, he's a respected icon.

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
A lie is a lie. Trying to ignore that lie doesn't make it less of a lie.

And applying generalized stereotypes to an entire group of people who number in the millions is itself a lie even if they apply to some.

Homosexual desires are contracted from a dysfunctional childhood; sexual molestation plays a huge part in it. Feelings and desires that evolve from that dysfunctional childhood are a lie.

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
A lot of time and effort went into researching the homosexuality of Adolf Hitler and those who surrounded him in the Third Reich. While the wiki is a good source for many things, amongst other things it doesn't mention that young Adolf Hitler was arrested for male prostitution by the Munich police. Like so many homosexuals do, Adolf Hitler had a deep hatred of himself and he used the power of government to hurt others.

Time and effort alone do not make research accurate. In a case where the research is being conducted by individuals paid to find a specific finding for propaganda purposes, it only makes it worse.

When you use the findings of respected German historians it makes it's accurate.

I know that it's difficult for the LGBTQ movement to acknowledge that Adolf Hitler was one of their own. Look at the bright side though: Hitler HATED Christians and Jews as much as the modern day homosexual movement does, Dan Savage included.

Did you know that homosexual activist/pedophile Larry Kramer of ACT UP! used Mein Kampf as a training tool?

The “gay” movement has done more than simply adopt Nazi styles and symbolism. Homosexual strategists have also embraced the terroristic tactics of the Nazi Brownshirts to advance their political agenda.
One of the most notorious groups to employ Nazi thuggery is the AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power (ACT-UP) which was founded in New York by Larry Kramer and approximately 300 other activists in March, 1987. (Alyson Almanac:42). Within a few months its members had gained national attention for their aggressive actions against those whom they considered enemies. ACT-UP groups invaded Catholic churches in New York during religious services, screaming obscenities and “stomping on communion wafers” (Miller:460). Catholic churches were also targeted in Washington, Los Angeles and Puerto Rico. Newspaper boxes were smashed in Sacramento to punish an editor for his views (Grant, 1993:104). One militant who later regretted his involvement was Washington, D.C. ACT-UP founder, Eric Pollard. The following is an excerpt from his 1992 letter to the Washington Blade titled, “Time to give up fascist tactics”:
This is very hard for me to write. It forces me to squarely confront my past actions and to accept responsibility for the damage I have had a part in causing. I sincerely apologize for my involvement in and my founding of the AIDS activist organization, ACT-UP D.C.. I have helped to create a truly fascist organization...The average Gay man or woman could not immediately relate to our subversive tactics, drawn largely from the voluminous Mein Kampf, which some of us studied as a working model (Washington Blade, January, 1992).
http://www.defendthefamily.com/pfrc/books/pinkswastika/html/the_pinkswastika_4th_edition_-_final.htm

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
The point of my posting Cameron's article again is to show that in order to contract certain extremely harmful and sometimes deadly sexually transmitted diseases, one (or both) of the participants in the homosexual act don't have to be infected with any disease (the mixture of blood, urine, semen, and feces brings about disease).

OMG! You really do believe that homosexual sex has magic powers!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! That the santorum (thank for reminding about Dan Savage) of homosexual sex can create spontaneous life and virus that didn't exist!!!

I laugh harder than that every time you use the word "monogamous" in the same sentence as homosexuality.

That being said: Remember that you admitted that 80% of homosexual males engage in buggery? (I'd say more do, but we'll go with 8 out of 10 figure). Putting aside all of the homosexual males that currently have HIV (many of them not aware of it), let's play pretend and say that neither Bruce or what'shisname came up HIV positive at their last monthly checkup. Here's what they have to look forward to getting:

Risk of Other Infections
In addition to HIV, a person can get other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) like chlamydia and gonorrhea from anal sex without condoms. Even if a condom is used, some STDs can still be transmitted through skin-to-skin contact (like syphilis or herpes). One can also get hepatitis A, B, and C; parasites like Giardia and intestinal amoebas; and bacteria like Shigella, Salmonella, Campylobacter, and E. coli from anal sex without a condom because they’re transmitted through feces. Getting tested and treated for STDs reduces a person’s chances of getting or transmitting HIV through anal sex. If one has never had hepatitis A or B, there are vaccines to prevent them. A health care provider can make recommendations about vaccines.
https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/risk/analsex.html

Let's say Bruce and what'shisname are too scared to be "real homosexuals" and don't buggerize one another. Here's some things that can be contracted through oral sex:

Risk of Other Infections
Other STDs, such as syphilis, herpes, gonorrhea and chlamydia, can be transmitted during oral sex. Anilingus can also transmit hepatitis A and B, intestinal parasites like Giardia, and bacteria like E. coli.
https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/risk/oralsex.html

We won't discuss things like golden showers, fisting and coprophilia, cuz if we did I've have to bring Kevin Jennings into the picture, and surely you don't want to talk about how a homosexual activist like the founder of GLSEN and Obama's Safe Schools program taught teenagers how to "fist".

Oh, what the heck: Let's talk about Kevin Jennings and what he teaches America's youth.

The "Fistgate" conference:
HERE'S what homosexual activists in schools do
with children . . .
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/issues/fistgate/index.html

Keynote speaker Kevin Jennings (right) at infamous "Fistgate" conference, holding conference program. (Photo from print edition of Massachusetts News, May 2000 Special Report.)

Those are some "leaders" you have Kit.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Let's see what homosexuals/homosexual activists are up to so that they can take even more parental rights away:

'A baby cannot provide ... consent': Calif. lawmakers denounce infant intersex surgeries
“These surgeries should be performed only with informed consent by the person whose life will be permanently impacted."

August 28, 2018

The California State Legislature approved a resolution on Tuesday denouncing medically unnecessary surgeries for intersex children.
"Intersex children should be free to choose whether to undergo life-altering surgeries that irreversibly — and sometimes irreparably — cause harm," the resolution states.

SCR 110 was introduced by Sen. Scott Wiener, a Democrat whose district includes San Francisco, and it was supported by Equality California, a statewide LGBTQ advocacy group, and interACT, an intersex youth advocacy organization.
In a statement provided to NBC News, Wiener said the resolution “recognizes that California’s intersex community is a part of our state’s diversity and should be embraced.”
“These surgeries should be performed only with informed consent by the person whose life will be permanently impacted,” Wiener stated. “A baby cannot provide that consent.”
“These surgeries can have significant negative impacts on people’s lives, particularly if the gender chosen by the physician and parents is different from the child’s ultimate gender identity,” Wiener continued.

Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc...rs-denounce-infant-intersex-surgeries-n903686


Where shall I start with this insanity? How about a brief review of pedophile John Money, the founder of the modern day "intersex movement"?

 

[aCultureWarrior]

A Modern Day Horror Story On The Origin Of The Transgender Movement
Exposing the Ugly History of Gender
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=5034965&viewfull=1#post5034965

Numerous posts follow that link.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

BTW: Here's a quote by Money:

"Money said there was “affectional pedophilia” and “sadistic pedophilia” and that “If I were to see the case of a boy aged 10 or 11 who’s intensely erotically attracted towards a man in his twenties or thirties, if the relationship is totally mutual, and the bonding is genuinely totally mutual… then I would not call it pathological in any way.”
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=5036708&viewfull=1#post5036708

Pedophile and LGBTQ activist Dr. John Money

The next post will talk about openly homosexual CA State Senator Scott Wiener and "consent".

 

[aCultureWarrior]

A little about openly homosexual California State Senator Scott Wiener (seen here campaigning at San Fransicko's Folsom Street Fair...I'd link the FSF website, but it's already been established that homosexual "culture" is extremely perverse).

http://static.adweek.com/adweek.com-prod/wp-content/uploads/files/blogs/scott-wiener-hed-2016.png

Wiener joined Assembly member Todd Gloria to author SB 239, which aims to change the laws that make it a felony to expose someone to HIV without their knowledge and consent.[23] Wiener said that the laws unfairly single out HIV-positive people.[24] The bill passed and was signed by Governor Jerry Brown on October 6, 2017.[25]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Wiener

So it's ok to spread HIV/AIDS without "consent" Scotty, but loving parents who want to have a small penis removed from their hermaphrodite baby girl (who will grow up gender confuse if it's not removed, not to mention the taunting she would receive from other children) don't have that God-given right because their month old baby couldn't utter the words "I give consent"?

How about if a teenager with homosexual desires or gender confusion wants to seek therapy to help him or her understand and overcome those desires and confusion, does "consent" count then Scotty?

If people haven't figured out that we're dealing with some very evil people here, it's time you wake up, realize that and so something about it.

 

[Kit the Coyote]

Should check out his sex column "Savage Love" at TheStranger.com. If you really want to know what the face of sexual perversion and HATRED of God looks like, this is it:

In any event, I'm glad that you're acting like Dan Savage is some kind of decent human being instead of saying that he represents the far-out fringe of the LGBT movement. Like I said before, he's a respected icon.

He is a bit of a scamp, isn't he? I did check out the advice column, in particular, the one that started the whole monogamy issue and I wondered how you would answer it.

He was responding to a bisexual woman who says she only finds sexual satisfaction with men but no romantic connections so she doesn't stay with one man. She only finds romantic connections (love) with a woman. She 42 years old so she is not a confused teenager.

She has found a woman that she is head over heels in love with, she wants to marry her and spend the rest of her life with that woman. She is worried though since sex will not be that satisfying.

She knows she will not find a man she could do that with so if she refuses to marry this woman, she will spend the rest of her sex life with an endless string of different men and the associated risk of STDs, unwed pregnancy, etc.

Now Savage's answer was that she was setting herself up in a trap and that she and her mate should set some ground rules that would allow for occasional outside affairs. I don't necessarily agree with that viewpoint but I wouldn't condemn them for doing it if it works.

So I wondered how you would answer this woman. Keep in mind the old Army saying, never give an order you know won't be obeyed.

You can go on about sin and immorality of homosexuality but at 42 she has likely heard it all already and is pretty set in her sexuality. Let's assume this is the order that will not be obeyed.

You give her the spiel about homosexual sex and diseases but you would be lying your tail end off as lesbian sex is actually safer than heterosexual sex in that regard.

You can give her the line about marriage being only for a man and woman but since she cannot find lasting love in such a relationship you will be advising her to continue having a string of loveless sexual encounters with the associated high risk of disease and depression.

Or you could advise her to get married to this woman and live a life with happiness and little risk of STDs, though they would have to find a way to deal with the sex issue. This would be my recommendation.

So what would you tell her? Your usual spiel that puts her on the path to death and unhappiness?

When you use the findings of respected German historians it makes it's accurate.

I personally don't care if he was or wasn't. This from the wiki tells me all I need to know about him:

Hitler's regime persecuted homosexuals, sending an estimated 5,000 to 15,000 to concentration camps; some 2,500 to 7,500 of these died.[27] Ernst Röhm was his closest friend—the only person who called him "Adolf"[28]—but after the Night of the Long Knives (1934), Hitler described the homosexuality of Röhm and other SA leaders as corrupt and immoral.[29] In August 1941, Hitler declared that "homosexuality is actually as infectious and as dangerous as the plague",[30] and supported Reichsführer-SS Heinrich Himmler's efforts to remove gay men from the military and the SS. Male homosexuality was illegal, and offenders were sent to prison or directly to concentration camps.[31]

Based on the bolded part, it seems he is more an idol to you than to me.

The wiki also says:

In research following Hitler's death, a variety of claims have been made about Hitler's sexual orientation: that he was gay, bisexual, or asexual. Conclusive evidence is lacking, but most historians believe he was heterosexual.

Which is really the problem with the homosexual claims, there is no real evidence to back up the claims. One researcher claimed he was court-martialed in the army for pederasty but there is no court-martial record to support that claim.

So I tend to go with what most historians believe. But in the end, it doesn't matter Hitler's evil had little to do with his sexuality. He was an evil man who hated others based on his stereotypes of them.

If he was a homosexual, he was one of the self-loathing kind that expresses that self-hatred in hatred and condemnation of others. Though he would more correctly be labeled bisexual since he had relationships with women.

I laugh harder than that every time you use the word "monogamous" in the same sentence as homosexuality.

That being said: Remember that you admitted that 80% of homosexual males engage in buggery? (I'd say more do, but we'll go with 8 out of 10 figure). Putting aside all of the homosexual males that currently have HIV (many of them not aware of it), let's play pretend and say that neither Bruce or whatshisname came up HIV positive at their last monthly checkup. Here's what they have to look forward to getting:

And once again biology 101, you can't get a disease if no one in the relationship has the disease. You may laugh at monogamy among homosexuals but your claims to magic in relation to homosexual sex is the laughable issue. From the CDC:

Mutual monogamy means that you agree to be sexually active with only one person, who has agreed to be sexually active only with you. Being in a long-term mutually monogamous relationship with an uninfected partner is one of the most reliable ways to avoid STDs.

If Bruce and whatshisname aren't sleeping with anybody else since they were last tested, they don't have to worry about most of those things you list, the few other things they would probably get anyway since they are transmitted by food and they are probably eating the same meals.

We won't discuss things like golden showers, fisting, and coprophilia,

Yes, let's not discuss them. One, they are not exclusive homosexual behaviors and two they are rare uncommon fetishes that are more fantasies than actual practices.

Oh, what the heck: Let's talk about Kevin Jennings and what he teaches America's youth.

The "Fistgate" conference:
HERE'S what homosexual activists in schools do
with children . . .
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/issues/fistgate/index.html

Keynote speaker Kevin Jennings (right) at infamous "Fistgate" conference, holding conference program. (Photo from the print edition of Massachusetts News, May 2000 Special Report.)

Those are some "leaders" you have Kit.

Oh, another person who I've never heard of that is supposed to be my leader. Having read an account of what happened, I am not surprised to find you are greatly misrepresenting and exaggerating Jennings and GLESN's role in the incident.

Controversial session reportedly led by Massachusetts Education officials, who were fired or resigned. The Times editorial stated that the conference "was sponsored by Mr. Jennings' organization," but ignored that the controversial session itself -- one of "over 50 sessions" at the conference, according to Jennings -- was run "by two [Massachusetts] Department of Education AIDS-HIV education specialists and a consultant to the department," as reported in a May 18, 2000, Boston Herald article retrieved from the Nexis database. According to a May 20, 2000, Boston Herald article, of the three state Department of Education employees or contractors who led the seminar, one was fired, one resigned, and one had his contract canceled as a result of the discussion.

Jennings "surprised and troubled" by accounts of the session. The May 18 Herald article reported that GLSEN "agreed yesterday that three workshop leaders crossed a line with raunchy content directed at students as young as 14 years old." In the article, Jennings, who was the executive director of GLSEN at the time, was quoted saying, "We need to make our expectations and guidelines to outside facilitators much more clear because we are surprised and troubled by some of the accounts we've heard."

https://www.mediamatters.org/resear...s-continues-its-relentless-campaign-ag/157938

But why let the truth get in the way of a good slandering eh?

 

[Kit the Coyote]

So since we are still going on about LGBT leaders, here another:

Dame Inga Kristine Beale

Openly bisexual, she is the first female CEO of Llyods of London. She was appointed Dame Commander of the Order of the British Empire (DBE) in the 2017 New Year Honours for services to the economy.