Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 3

[alwight]

Give it a rest Al, you're embarrassing yourself.

On the internet no one can see you blush aCW.
However it's pretty clear that your ancient scripture can be cherry picked but if it isn't then it's you who is embarrassed here.

 

[Arthur Brain]

What's your alternative to incarceration for murderers, rapists and robbers Art, letting them run free?

Well of course not. They're all violating people's rights and should at least be incarcerated in order to protect the public. Consenting homosexual adults are contravening no such thing and your "solution" would only further cement the very thing you apparently wish to eradicate given your previous. You don't really think these things through do you?

 

[Arthur Brain]

He wants to send me to the gay recruiting office (jail) for smoking marijuana.

I think his agenda is to secretly turn us all gay.

Well, I think Morpheus may have had his number on an adjoining thread. As bizarre as it may seem that someone like aCW could pass a test to become part of law enforcement there are plenty of cases of nutballs being in the police who get booted off the force. I'm 50/50 as to whether he's just fantasized about being a cop or an embittered crank who got booted out for being one. He sure ain't one now (or ever was really).

 

[intojoy]

Caligula?

I'm not sure how reasonable or honest it is to offer Caligula as a typical homosexual since his "sins" were just as likely to be heterosexual in nature as homosexual plus being crazy and a despotic emperor is hardly typical or representative of any group of people.

I presume here that you are speaking for God as to what exactly is sinful and abominable, not simply your own possibly homophobic personal opinion that you would like to be given a Godly amplification?

How exactly you know the thoughts of "homos" is rather curious never mind if they actually are "impure" or not, perhaps God tells you? :think:

Anyway on this thread at least I think you'll find that aCW is God's actual spokesperson on Earth.





"allrong" doesn't work on several levels. "wight" is not the same as "wright" or "right" unless like aCW you sometimes have a speech impediment.

"allwrong" might have been a bit better, but mainly intojoy it's just so terribly lame.





Do you eat shellfish intojoy?

Only heterosexual ones

 

[alwight]

Only heterosexual ones

Maybe sinners like you and aCW are just as damned as I am.

Matthew 5:19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.

Repent?

 

[intojoy]

Maybe sinners like you and aCW are just as damned as I am.



Matthew 5:19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.



Repent?

Acw is not on my saved list.

 

[intojoy]

Maybe sinners like you and aCW are just as damned as I am.



Matthew 5:19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.



Repent?

You jewish allrong?

 

[Arthur Brain]

Acw is not on my saved list.

Is he on a shopping coupon instead? Else, you're sounding about as whacked out as he is about now.

 

[intojoy]

Is he on a shopping coupon instead? Else, you're sounding about as whacked out as he is about now.

Why would anyone be saved and not share the gospel?

 

[intojoy]

You don't even know what the gospel is.

 

[Kdall]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
I highly doubt that giving anyone "rights" based on an unnatural sexual behavior (one that is changeable by the way) was on the mind of our Christian Founding Fathers when they wrote the founding documents of our once great nation.



"Animals of high intelligence...". That's a new one. Animals partake in many things that civilized humans don't: cannibalism, killing their young, gang rape, etc. I guess those aren't the "intelligent" ones that you were referring to?

This subject has been brought up numerous times throughout this 3 part thread. Here's the latest post:

The myth of homosexuality in nature
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4133277&postcount=3643


I see that you're an incestophobe. If two guys can legally buggerize each other, why can't people who are closely related to one another have male-female sex?

You're sick.

1. The Founding Fathers were not Christian. They were followers of the Enlightenment thinkers such as John Locke.

2. Humans engage in every single thing you claimed that they don't. Do you live under a rock?

3. I am against incest. Simply because it causes more deficient offspring. Two men can't even have a child.

If you think that your sister is hot and you want to "buggerize" her then you better get way out of any society.

Again, you're sick and support incest

 

[Arthur Brain]

Why would anyone be saved and not share the gospel?

Apparently aCW, in his own inimitable fashion, thinks he's doing just that. Nevermind...

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Acw is not on my saved list.

Now that my life has been totally ruined, would you care to contribute to the thread?

Start by responding to this post.

Quote:
Originally Posted by intojoy
It [homosexuality] should be condemned but if government doesn't condemn it we have to put up with it. But it should be absolutely presented for what it is - an abomination a sin

Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
Where is it written that a society has to "put up with" unrighteous laws?
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4250883&postcount=6184

 

[aCultureWarrior]

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4251304&postcount=6196

You're sick.

I assume that you're the homosexualist previously known as "Balfour4"?

1. The Founding Fathers were not Christian. They were followers of the Enlightenment thinkers such as John Locke.

Anytime that you want to refute any of my posts, feel free to get this thread going again.
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=78375&highlight=Founding+Fathers

2. Humans engage in every single thing you claimed that they don't. Do you live under a rock?

Cannibalism, infanticide and gang rape, obviously your kind of peeps.

3. I am against incest. Simply because it causes more deficient offspring. Two men can't even have a child.

Two males having sex "breed" disease.

If you think that your sister is hot and you want to "buggerize" her then you better get way out of any society.

Again, you're sick and support incest

Thanks for stopping by Balfour4/Kdall. Oh and be sure to do what the head queer does regularly:

"Get tested".

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote: Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Your turn Al: What happened in your life that caused you to defend perversion?

What is "perversion" is rather like "beauty" aCW, in the mind's eye of the beholder.

Peter the pedophile couldn't have said it better Al.*

*Leading UK homosexual activist Peter Tatchell actually wasn't photographed holding that sign, it was photo shopped based on a letter to the editor that he wrote defending pedophilia in some cases.

 

[Kdall]

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4251304&postcount=6196



I assume that you're the homosexualist previously known as "Balfour4"?



Anytime that you want to refute any of my posts, feel free to get this thread going again.
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=78375&highlight=Founding+Fathers



Cannibalism, infanticide and gang rape, obviously your kind of peeps.



Two males having sex "breed" disease.



Thanks for stopping by Balfour4/Kdall. Oh and be sure to do what the head queer does regularly:

"Get tested".

So your only argument is your own words? Pathetic. I hope your sister doesn't know what you want to do to her

 

[alwight]

You jewish allrong?

No, I'm an agnostic atheist.

 

[alwight]

Peter the pedophile couldn't have said it better Al.*

So Tatchell has his own views, good for Pete, so what?

Btw not Porno Pete obviously if you and he are the same person.

Should we all obediently adhere to your particular AFTAH definition of "perversion" aCW or should we each think for ourselves?

 

[GFR7]

Btw not Porno Pete obviously if you and he are the same person.

Should we all obediently adhere to your particular AFTAH definition of "perversion" aCW or should we each think for ourselves?

ARE they one and the same man? The burning questions these past 8 months........ :think:

 

[aCultureWarrior]

What is "perversion" is rather like "beauty" aCW, in the mind's eye of the beholder.lain:

Peter the pedophile couldn't have said it better Al.*

*Leading UK homosexual activist Peter Tatchell actually wasn't photographed holding that sign, it was photo shopped based on a letter to the editor that he wrote defending pedophilia in some cases.

So Tatchell has his own views, good for Pete, so what?

The pedophile/pederast wing of the LGBTQueer movement speaks for the entire movement:

"Leave me alone to do "my thing". If your "thing" isn't kiddy sex so be it, but don't judge me because your behavior is just as immoral as mine".

Btw not Porno Pete obviously if you and he are the same person.

I'm honored Al, but sorry, you're once again wrong (why ruin a perfect track record?).

Should we all obediently adhere to your particular AFTAH definition of "perversion" aCW or should we each think for ourselves?

We've seen what happens when man "thinks for himself" and disregards God's Word:

Disease, misery and death.