GFR7
New member
All I had to do was Google "children at Pride parades". :nono:
Here is the version you refer to, via Google images:
Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 3
- Thread starter aCultureWarrior
- Start date
- Status
Here is the version you refer to, via Google images:
GFR7
New member
We know that many children have been brought to these Pride parades as we seem them standing or being held in numerous images, and we know what is shown at said parades:
What has always perplexed me, is that if a group of academics or entrepreneurs or firefighters ever staged parades dressing and acting like this, they would all be arrested. Why not gays? :think:
What has always perplexed me, is that if a group of academics or entrepreneurs or firefighters ever staged parades dressing and acting like this, they would all be arrested. Why not gays? :think:
alwight
New member
Then we've probably got aCW to thank for that particular picture/source featuring highly in searches.
GFR7
New member
Does that diminish the meaning and message of the pic, though? :think:Then we've probably got aCW to thank for that particular picture/source featuring highly in searches.
Addendum:
I think the picture ranks high in SEO on the Google search engine due to this article featuring it, re Facebook:
http://bernardgaynor.com.au/facebook-says-torontos-pride-parade-breaches-community-standards/
TracerBullet
New member
it wouldn't be propaganda if it was representative
GFR7
New member
It need not represent all gays or all of gay pride parades, to speak loudly of certain dangers. Some of us are parents, and are fearful for children (not due to parades, which we keep them away from, but due to a certain indoctrination in schools and in society. I am not speaking about being fair to gay people, and leaving them to their privacy: That I support roundly.)
TracerBullet
New member
representing all gays is exactly what you wanted to do.
at least be man enough to be honest about your motives
GFR7
New member
I might have over-stated on the Truong -Newton case. I do believe that they represent an extreme , but one existing on a continuum of feeling shared by gay males. Perhaps because I spent a great deal of time in a gay community of a certain notoriety, I 've come to believe that things are not as scrubbed and clean as the advocates would like to present, and want people to believe.
Just listen to the things Dan Savage will say about his marriage ("is it really adultery if I'm at one end of a guy, and he's at the other?" - this, while he is advocating for gay marriage.)
If I am wrong ; if my thinking is in excess, time will reveal it. (And if I were proven wrong, I would both admit it, and apologize for my error.)
GFR7
New member
Here is something which I think it is important to post here, and on the marriage thread.
What is being done in this Italian district I think speaks to many in the US and elsewhere who have the same concern about an agenda being pushed in schools:
Lombardy rejects ‘gay marriage’ and gender propaganda in schools
What is being done in this Italian district I think speaks to many in the US and elsewhere who have the same concern about an agenda being pushed in schools:
Lombardy rejects ‘gay marriage’ and gender propaganda in schools
http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/lombardy-rejects-gay-marriage-and-gender-propaganda-in-schools
Overstated? A good percentage of those that partake in homosexual behavior were molested themselves, why do you think that the Truong-Newton case was something that is extreme amongst homosexuals? Keep in mind that these degenerates molest the minds of children regularly (as shown in the posts where children are being subjected to nudity at pride parades and festivals like the Folsom Street Fair). Keep in mind that homosexual males destroyed the Boy Scouts of America and made the Catholic Church the brunt of many child molestation jokes.
So why on earth do you think that two perverts that adopted an innocent child and molested him are extreme and not a commonality amongst homosexuals?
If you don't mind me asking, are you an ex homosexual?
I did an entire segment on traditional marriage, emphasizing how invaluable it is to a society. I don't talk about homosexuals 'marrying' much because as I've mentioned many times before, it's just one aspect of the 'gay agenda'.
You can't defeat the cancer that is killing our society by dealing with only one aspect of it, you have to cut it out at the core in order for the body to survive.
Recriminalizing homosexuality and changing our cultural mores' is a step in the right direction that very well might save our once Christian nation.
You know I hear a lot about the unpopular gay agenda; and I don't think it has made any progress from being an upperclass disease.
Unpopular? If it were unpopular with the masses it wouldn't have gotten as far as it has today.
TracerBullet
New member
What percentage?
how does that compare to heterosexuals who were molested as children?
evidence that this is a factor in the development of sexual orientation?
I've lost track of how many times you have been asked for supporting evidence and not once have you been honest enough to provide any
you mean the guy in the vaguely flesh colored tights?
Since you have a long history of posting photo shopped pictures I have to wonder if this isn't another one of those
http://www.newsandtribune.com/local...rks-guilty-of-child-molesting-in-Clark-County
http://www.thelocal.se/20131129/convicted-swedish-paedophile-allowed-to-adopt
http://www.dailybreeze.com/general-news/20130814/torrance-podiatrist-faces-child-molestation-charges
obviously it is common for heterosexuals to molest adopted children
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Overstated? A good percentage of those that partake in homosexual behavior were molested themselves,
While I dedicated an entire segment to this topic
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3393262&postcount=17
here's a link backing it.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1420619/posts
http://www.peoplecanchange.com/
I'd be interested to hear what you believe causes homosexual desires Traci.
You should see a doctor for that Traci, as you might be in the Tertiary stage with your memory loss and all.
http://www.niaid.nih.gov/topics/syphilis/understanding/Pages/symptoms.aspx.
Quote:
why do you think that the Truong-Newton case was something that is extreme amongst homosexuals? Keep in mind that these degenerates molest the minds of children regularly (as shown in the posts where children are being subjected to nudity at pride parades and festivals like the Folsom Street Fair).
I think it was that evil Family Research Council once again trying to make homosexuals look bad.
Quote:
Keep in mind that homosexual males destroyed the Boy Scouts of America and made the Catholic Church the brunt of many child molestation jokes.
So why on earth do you think that two perverts that adopted an innocent child and molested him are extreme and not a commonality amongst homosexuals?
What should be done by adoption officials Traci, so that these innocent children aren't placed in the custody of perverts?
Maybe adoptive parents Dan Savage and Terry Miller should be a model for officials to follow?
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Overstated? A good percentage of those that partake in homosexual behavior were molested themselves,
While I dedicated an entire segment to this topic
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3393262&postcount=17
here's a link backing it.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1420619/posts
http://www.peoplecanchange.com/
I'd be interested to hear what you believe causes homosexual desires Traci.
You should see a doctor for that Traci, as you might be in the Tertiary stage with your memory loss and all.
http://www.niaid.nih.gov/topics/syphilis/understanding/Pages/symptoms.aspx.
Quote:
why do you think that the Truong-Newton case was something that is extreme amongst homosexuals? Keep in mind that these degenerates molest the minds of children regularly (as shown in the posts where children are being subjected to nudity at pride parades and festivals like the Folsom Street Fair).
I think it was that evil Family Research Council once again trying to make homosexuals look bad.
Quote:
Keep in mind that homosexual males destroyed the Boy Scouts of America and made the Catholic Church the brunt of many child molestation jokes.
So why on earth do you think that two perverts that adopted an innocent child and molested him are extreme and not a commonality amongst homosexuals?
What should be done by adoption officials Traci, so that these innocent children aren't placed in the custody of perverts?
Maybe adoptive parents Dan Savage and Terry Miller should be a model for officials to follow?
GFR7
New member
Well, because they keep saying I am wrong about Truong-Newton being a prototype , so I softened my stance so as not to appear an extremist. I went from saying they were an extreme of what lies just beneath the surface in most gay males, to saying they are an extreme end of a continuum of gay male sensibility.
No, I do not mind you asking, and no, I am not an ex-homosexual- I spent a lot of time in Provincetown, MA (gay community) because I had family there.
GFR7
New member
Yes, it certainly does happen. What was different about the Truong-Newton case is that you had two gay male partners and their friends all reinforcing each other and all molesting the adopted boy. The couple worked in concert with each other, and with their network of gay, male friends. There was a prevailing ideology that they all shared.
Last edited:
It has been an upperclass disease for a while. If you don't believe there hasn't been homo adoptions in the past, you are sadly mistaken.
GFR7
New member
How likely is this to become a reality (failing total war/economic collapse and a complete regrouping of the social structure and/or a sudden spread of disease by the gay population)?
There has not even been a backlash against same-sex marriage, with many Republicans and Libertarians giving it the wink and nod. Even when I go on Catholic forums and someone complains about their primary school child being taught about 2 women marrying and adopting a baby, the general consensus is that that is fine, the child must learn about diversity.
Under our current conditions (still an affluent society with lots of academia-bias and media influence not to mention the entertainment industry and the influencing power of the APA) what you are proposing seems to me to be at this present juncture absolutely unattainable. Please enlighten me about how this drastic change might occur or what you propose to do about politicians who are spineless and go with the flow of whatever is culturally popular.
I highly respect your unwavering determination but it must align with reality.
Last edited:
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
I did an entire segment on traditional marriage, emphasizing how invaluable it is to a society. I don't talk about homosexuals 'marrying' much because as I've mentioned many times before, it's just one aspect of the 'gay agenda'.
You can't defeat the cancer that is killing our society by dealing with only one aspect of it, you have to cut it out at the core in order for the body to survive.
Recriminalizing homosexuality and changing our cultural mores' is a step in the right direction that very well might save our once Christian nation.
So knowing what harm homosexuality does to the individual engaging in it and knowing what harm the homosexual agenda has done to western civilization, you're going to sit back and do absolutely nothing about it?
I opened this 3 part thread with this quote:
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."
Edmund Burke
If a person knows that evil exists and does absolutely nothing about it, can that person call himself a man? I think not, as being a man, amongst other things requires courage in the face of adversity.
Perhaps you have an underlying problem with recriminalization fearing that a close friend or relative will be effected by it?
I ask not for a lighter burden, but for broader shoulders.
-- Jewish Proverb
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
I did an entire segment on traditional marriage, emphasizing how invaluable it is to a society. I don't talk about homosexuals 'marrying' much because as I've mentioned many times before, it's just one aspect of the 'gay agenda'.
You can't defeat the cancer that is killing our society by dealing with only one aspect of it, you have to cut it out at the core in order for the body to survive.
Recriminalizing homosexuality and changing our cultural mores' is a step in the right direction that very well might save our once Christian nation.
So knowing what harm homosexuality does to the individual engaging in it and knowing what harm the homosexual agenda has done to western civilization, you're going to sit back and do absolutely nothing about it?
I opened this 3 part thread with this quote:
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."
Edmund Burke
If a person knows that evil exists and does absolutely nothing about it, can that person call himself a man? I think not, as being a man, amongst other things requires courage in the face of adversity.
Perhaps you have an underlying problem with recriminalization fearing that a close friend or relative will be effected by it?
I ask not for a lighter burden, but for broader shoulders.
-- Jewish Proverb
- Status