Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
OUCH! Now that hurt Sandy (GFR7 is a sociopath who pretends that he's against the homosexual agenda).

Sociopaths want gain for themselves, at the expense of others.

(The prosecution rests it's case). After viewing your posts throughout part 3 of this 3 part thread, I'm leaning more towards you being a psychopath instead of a sociopath, but then a licensed clinical psychologist (with no ties to the APA) would need to do that diagnosis.

I doubt very much that posting anti-gay marriage threads on TOL constitutes sociopathic behavior. Nor would my pretense of being against it , if I were really for it. You'll have to think of another label for me

I can't help but laugh every time you say that. You think that you've found your little niche to keep homosexuality legal by pretending you're against one of the things that is the result of it's legalization.

Your stance on keeping homosexuality legal is no more valid than an abortionist saying:

"But I'm against late term abortions!"

It's no more valid that a pornographer saying:

"But I'm against kiddy porn!"

Keep trying GFR7, as that's what con artists like yourself do.

- You look good, banned, aCW. Very attractive. :kiss:

What homosexualist GFR7 just said is: 'The Truth looks good when it's suppressed' (GFR7 and WizardofOz have so much in common, I wonder if they know each other?).

23b598bb0763ac09f913a5ddafe6fe85.jpg
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
and finish with the one that I suspect everyone is wondering about (Did aCW use profanity?).

Oh yes, the world is on the edge of its seat over this, you narcissistic fool.

(Oh my, after a long night of rock n rollin, booze, drugs and hanging out with groupies, Wizardofoz's fellow Libertarian seems to be a bit on edge this morning. Being that it's only 9 AM Denver time, I suspect shag didn't get enough sleep).

Back later with the post.
 

shagster01

New member
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
and finish with the one that I suspect everyone is wondering about (Did aCW use profanity?).



(Oh my, after a long night of rock n rollin, booze, drugs and hanging out with groupies, Wizardofoz's fellow Libertarian seems to be a bit on edge this morning. Being that it's only 10 AM Mountain Time, I suspect shag didn't get enough sleep).

Back later with the post.

It's 9 am, bro.

I hope in your cop days, you never made detective.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
It's 9 am, bro.

I edited it. Since you're up and about, tell us about those "civil rights" that annadenebetti was talking about.

You know, the "civil right" that allows our society to murder 58 million unborn babies (this is where shag says" How do you murder something that hasn't been born yet?"). Or the "civil right" that allows a morally confused person to engage in a behavior that is inherently disease ridden and brings nothing but misery and death to those who engage in it.

The floor is yours shag.
 

shagster01

New member
I edited it. Since you're up and about, tell us about those "civil rights" that annadenebetti was talking about.

You know, the "civil right" that allows our society to murder 58 million unborn babies (this is where shag says" How do you murder something that hasn't been born yet?"). Or the "civil right" that allows a morally confused person to engage in a behavior that is inherently disease ridden and brings nothing but misery and death to those who engage in it.

The floor is yours shag.

My wife is a dietician. Are you fine with legally being required to eat what she tells you to because she knows what is best for you? No more bacon or sugar as those lead to disease and bring nothing but misery and death to those who eat it.

Or is it only you allowed to control others "health"?
 

GFR7

New member
aCultureWarrior said:
(The prosecution rests it's case). After viewing your posts throughout part 3 of this 3 part thread, I'm leaning more towards you being a psychopath instead of a sociopath, but then a licensed clinical psychologist (with no ties to the APA) would need to do that diagnosis.
I have in fact been under the care of a clinical psychologist in the past (for grief and depression) and I am no psychopath nor sociopath - in fact, the opposite. I tend toward too much honesty and too much compassion and care for others. You big dummy :D




I can't help but laugh every time you say that. You think that you've found your little niche to keep homosexuality legal by pretending you're against one of the things that is the result of it's legalization.
I wouldn't care if it became illegal tomorrow. It has nothing to do with me.



Keep trying GFR7, as that's what con artists like yourself do.
I have nothing to try for, and conning is foreign to me - but not to YOU, you first class idjut. :kiss:

I notice you cannot answer my very important question about the APA , you blabbering old wind-bag.(and no, you did not use profanity, just an abbreviated term for homosexual-hating) :) :think:
 
Last edited:

TracerBullet

New member
Now that a massively powerful and richly endowed organization such as the APA has reached this point with the LGBT lobby - and it has been building for decades now - [

The facts reveal that your implied association and conspiracy is nothing more than biased propaganda.
 

Christian Liberty

Well-known member
Mall security is not and never has been part of the police force

Correct. "Security" in general never has been. The police exist to control the populace and keep them from being free.

Sorry aCW, I really was going to stay out of this little thread, but I had to comment on this one. Go back to your regular conversation.
 

GFR7

New member
Correct. "Security" in general never has been. The police exist to control the populace and keep them from being free.

Sorry aCW, I really was going to stay out of this little thread, but I had to comment on this one. Go back to your regular conversation.
A hearty welcome back to you, Mr. CL! :thumb:
 

Christian Liberty

Well-known member
Lefties who call people like aCW "tyrants" for wanting to criminalize homosexuality and yet love their precious police because they enforce whatever arbitrary laws they support are worse than he is.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
... Since you're up and about, tell us about those "civil rights" that annadenebetti was talking about.

You know, the "civil right" that allows our society to murder 58 million unborn babies (this is where shag says" How do you murder something that hasn't been born yet?"). Or the "civil right" that allows a morally confused person to engage in a behavior that is inherently disease ridden and brings nothing but misery and death to those who engage in it.

The floor is yours shag.

My wife is a dietician. Are you fine with legally being required to eat what she tells you to because she knows what is best for you? No more bacon or sugar as those lead to disease and bring nothing but misery and death to those who eat it.

Or is it only you allowed to control others "health"?

So in your mind eating bacon and sugar is the equivalent to the extermination of 58 million innocents and engaging in a disease ridden behavior whose agenda involves the indoctrination and physical molestation of children?

My next question is:

Have you always thought that way or did it start after you began using and later became addicted to dope?
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
The police exist to control the populace and keep them from being free.

Sorry aCW, I really was going to stay out of this little thread, but I had to comment on this one. Go back to your regular conversation.

Welcome back Jr. While you were away I showed the HATRED that the LGBTQueer movement has towards the American criminal justice system (most likely due to being arrested in public restrooms & parks for lewd acts and for loitering while checking out the 'menu' at places like school playgrounds and McDonalds Playlands).

Obviously you Libertarians feel the same way as your LGBTQueer allies do.
 

Christian Liberty

Well-known member
Welcome back Jr. While you were away I showed the HATRED that the LGBTQueer movement has towards the American criminal justice system (most likely due to being arrested in public restrooms & parks for lewd acts and for loitering while checking out the 'menu' at places like school playgrounds and McDonalds Playlands).

Obviously you Libertarians feel the same way as your LGBTQueer allies do.

Are you seriously suggesting there is only one problem an individual can have with the American justice system? That everyone who has issues with it has those issues for the same reasons?

I have theonomist friends who hate the American criminal justice system and the man-made concept of "prison" yet believe homosexuality should be punishable by execution.

Are they the allies of LGBTQers to?

I don't like the LGBT movement. I really don't. I've actually had this argument with secular libertarians before. Its only you that makes it look like I support them, but I really don't.
 

shagster01

New member
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
... Since you're up and about, tell us about those "civil rights" that annadenebetti was talking about.

You know, the "civil right" that allows our society to murder 58 million unborn babies (this is where shag says" How do you murder something that hasn't been born yet?"). Or the "civil right" that allows a morally confused person to engage in a behavior that is inherently disease ridden and brings nothing but misery and death to those who engage in it.

The floor is yours shag.



So in your mind eating bacon and sugar is the equivalent to the extermination of 58 million innocents and engaging in a disease ridden behavior whose agenda involves the indoctrination and physical molestation of children?

My next question is:

Have you always thought that way or did it start after you began using and later became addicted to dope?

Since the legalization of abortion, how many people have died of diet influenced problems including heart attacks?

Answer: more than abortion and aids put together.
 

Christian Liberty

Well-known member
Since the legalization of abortion, how many people have died of diet influenced problems including heart attacks?

Answer: more than abortion and aids put together.

Yeah, but eating unhealthy isn't inherently immoral, while murdering people is. I'm going to have to at least sort of agree with aCW on this one. But in order to agree with him here, I have to disagree with him that legalizing the eating of dozens of big macs in a short period of time doesn't mean you endorse that behavior.
 

shagster01

New member
Yeah, but eating unhealthy isn't inherently immoral, while murdering people is. I'm going to have to at least sort of agree with aCW on this one. But in order to agree with him here, I have to disagree with him that legalizing the eating of dozens of big macs in a short period of time doesn't mean you endorse that behavior.

It isn't inherently immoral to you. Ask a 7th day adventist if they think the same.

I find interesting that as a Christian, you do not find vandalism of God's temple to be morally wrong.

Why must I live by your morals and not my own?
 

Christian Liberty

Well-known member
It isn't inherently immoral to you. Ask a 7th day adventist if they think the same.

I find interesting that as a Christian, you do not find vandalism of God's temple to be morally wrong.

Why must I live by your morals and not my own?

I definitely think eating unhealthy is ill advised (though I do it.) But the "Body is a temple of the Holy Spirit" passage is talking about sexual immorality, not eating right.

The reason I think abortion should be criminal is the same reason I think infanticide should be criminal, because its murder and it robs a person of the right to life. That said, I'm against criminalizing homosexuality.
 

shagster01

New member
I definitely think eating unhealthy is ill advised (though I do it.) But the "Body is a temple of the Holy Spirit" passage is talking about sexual immorality, not eating right.

Either it is the temple of the spirit or it isn't. If it is, you ought to treat it like it is.


The reason I think abortion should be criminal is the same reason I think infanticide should be criminal, because its murder and it robs a person of the right to life. That said, I'm against criminalizing homosexuality.

Why do you think anyone has a right to life? Where does this right come from? Certainly not nature.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top