Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 3

[aCultureWarrior]

you rant like a scared little man, where do you go to be a man and stand up for God's Word ? you are an Archie Bunker character. bigot. racist. full of hate because you hate yourself. and YES you troll on your own perverted thread. you are a drunken idiot, go watch your porn collection Culture Whiner. you have no concept of culture sitting there in your 1 room apartment drinking your vodka and lookin at your porn you are DISTGUSTING. how's that ? i'm talking like you:cheers:

(It doesn't take much to expose who the real homosexualists are, it's just a matter of pushing the right buttons. Oh and look, Patti has an ally (surprise surprise)).

There's something wrong with him, for certain. He lies and lies about you so that you can't respond normally. :nono:

(And now, GFR7/Scot gives more reasons why he should be able to continue his homosexual lifestyle without the threat of righteous laws hindering him) :

Right. aCW thinks that the fact that it was law for decades or centuries means it could be so now, forgetting that it was law before all this new ideology had become ingrained in the culture, the psychological and medical fields, the schools, and the Universities the world over. And it followed a natural trajectory in those laws being rejected by the public and by politicians.

It is the same with feminism: Just because for centuries and decades women were kept out of education and the workplace, does not mean we could return to such a state now. aCW thinks that time can reverse itself, but in fact any reversal would have to be done from the point at which we are now: A diminishing of popularity, but not a recriminalization.

There is no returning to the past, and that' s why we are at the point at which we are now. As Ortega y Gasset said in his historical political epic work, Every "anti" is simply a "no": If we are anti-Peter, we want to return to a world in which Peter never existed. But that is exactly what brought Peter into the world, and Peter would rise again if we attempted to deny him.

aCW needs more historical and political sense to understand what solutions can actually be applied and will truly work.

(Boy, I feel edjumacated after listening to those two lispers, I hope that the followers of this thread do as well).

(GASP! What a surprise, GFR7/Scot's new heartthrob Ortega y Gasset is yet another existentialist who studied the queer atheist Friedrich Nietzschke and of course Hitler's favorite, Arthur Schopenhauer, not to mention every evolutionist's favorite: Chuck Darwin).

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/gasset/

 

[GFR7]

(It doesn't take much to expose who the real homosexualists are, it's just a matter of pushing the right buttons. Oh and look, Patti has an ally (surprise surprise)).



(And now, GFR7/Scot gives more reasons why he should be able to continue his homosexual lifestyle without the threat of righteous laws hindering him) :



(Boy, I feel edjumacated after listening to those two lispers, I hope that the followers of this thread do as well).

(GASP! What a surprise, GFR7/Scot's new heartthrob Ortega y Gasset is yet another existentialist who studied the queer atheist Friedrich Nietzschke and of course Hitler's favorite, Arthur Schopenhauer, not to mention every evolutionist's favorite: Chuck Darwin).

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/gasset/

(Strange how aCW's followers never see fit to make an appearance on his thread; to offer any support for him, or to refute his detractors. :think: Nor do Scott Lively or Peter LaBarbera offer any kind of thanks at all. Not Matt Barber, either........)

Dum dum, I need no justifications of homosexuality, as it's not my thing. I am speaking of the general culture and society, and the trajectory of social movements.

You can't study the philosophy of history without reading
Ortega y Gasset's The Revolt of the Masses, 1930, you first class idiot. :kiss:

By today's politically correct standard, Ortega is quite conservative, and even in his day, was considered too class-conscious and aristocratic. Not a man for mass movements, in any sense---idjut!

Here is Ortega y Gasset in his prime, you first class idiot. :kiss:

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
(It doesn't take much to expose who the real homosexualists are, it's just a matter of pushing the right buttons. Oh and look, Patti has an ally (surprise surprise)).

(And now, GFR7/Scot gives more reasons why he should be able to continue his homosexual lifestyle without the threat of righteous laws hindering him) :

(Boy, I feel edjumacated after listening to those two lispers, I hope that the followers of this thread do as well).

(GASP! What a surprise, GFR7/Scot's new heartthrob Ortega y Gasset is yet another existentialist who studied the queer atheist Friedrich Nietzschke and of course Hitler's favorite, Arthur Schopenhauer, not to mention every evolutionist's favorite: Chuck Darwin).

(Strange how aCW's followers never see fit to make an appearance on his thread; to offer any support for him, or to refute his detractors. :think: Nor do Scott Lively or Peter LaBarbera offer any kind of thanks at all. Not Matt Barber, either........)

(Good point GFR7/Scot; as badly as you limp wristed homosexualists are tearing me limb from limb (for those sado-masochist bondage and discipline members of the LGBTQueer movement that are following this thread, don't let your imagination run away with you, I'm speaking figuratively, not literally), one would think that LaBarbera, Barber and Lively would come running to my aid.

Yep, uh huh).

Dum dum, I need no justifications of homosexuality, as it's not my thing. I am speaking of the general culture and society, and the trajectory of social movements.

You can't study the philosophy of history without reading
Ortega y Gasset's The Revolt of the Masses, 1930, you first class idiot. :kiss:

By today's politically correct standard, Ortega is quite conservative, and even in his day, was considered too class-conscious and aristocratic. Not a man for mass movements, in any sense---idjut!

While updating the table of contents I just can't get over how those that you "study" have (to the person) close ties/the same philosophy with/of the brutal mass murdering homosexual Adolf Hitler.

Must be a coincidence ey GFR7/Scot?

A quick question for you GFR7/Scot:

Does this look similar to your closet at home? (I realize that dresses are on one side of your closet, I was speaking about the other side).

 

[GFR7]

aCW: I thought this was you, until I read the location! :chuckle:

Pastor tells gay Christian: ‘I pray you commit suicide, you filthy child molesting fag’

http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2014/12/0...ommit-suicide-you-filthy-child-molesting-fag/

 

[GFR7]

(Good point GFR7/Scot; as badly as you limp wristed homosexualists are tearing me limb from limb (for those sado-masochist bondage and discipline members of the LGBTQueer movement that are following this thread, don't let your imagination run away with you, I'm speaking figuratively, not literally), one would think that LaBarbera, Barber and Lively would come running to my aid.

Yep, uh huh).

Well, why WOULDN'T they? :AMR1:

While updating the table of contents I just can't get over how those that you "study" have (to the person) close ties/the same philosophy with/of the brutal mass murdering homosexual Adolf Hitler.

Must be a coincidence ey GFR7/Scot?

A quick question for you GFR7/Scot:

Does this look similar to your closet at home? (I realize that dresses are on one side of your closet, I was speaking about the other side).

No. :AMR1:

 

[aCultureWarrior]

aCW: I thought this was you, until I read the location! :chuckle:

Pastor tells gay Christian: ‘I pray you commit suicide, you filthy child molesting fag’

http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2014/12/0...ommit-suicide-you-filthy-child-molesting-fag/

While I didn't read the article that you posted, as it's typical propaganda that your LGBTQueer movement uses to paint Christians as haters, I will remind you once again GFR7/Scot that Christianity is all about repentance and redemption, it's not about wanting someone who is sexually confused to kill themselves.

Here, let me fill in for the supposed Christian pastor and use the words that he should have said:

"GFR7/Scot, while I realize that terrible terrible things happened to you earlier in life and it truly did damage your outlook on what God designed for mankind in the way of sexuality, and even though you are a devout homosexual activist, you can ask Jesus Christ to help you change. If you ask Him from deep down in your heart, He will help you change."

 

[GFR7]

"GFR7/Scot, while I realize that terrible terrible things happened to you earlier in life and it truly did damage your outlook on what God designed for mankind in the way of sexuality, and even though you are a devout homosexual activist, you can ask Jesus Christ to help you change. If you ask Him from deep down in your heart, He will help you change."

:rotfl::rotfl: You really don't give up, do you? I think your next line is, You coulda been a contender.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

:rotfl::rotfl: You really don't give up, do you? I think your next line is, You coulda been a contender.

No I don't give up on lost souls GFR7/Scot. While "I'm not God" (as you stated in a post a few pages ago), God does have expectations of mankind; loving my neighbor (wanting the very best for him or her) as I would love myself is just one of them.

Back later with an updated table of contents (the Nazis of the Traditional Youth Network), and 3 very important posts from Part's 1, 2 and 3 of

Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized!

 

[GFR7]

No I don't give up on lost souls GFR7/Scot. While "I'm not God" (as you stated in a post a few pages ago), God does have expectations of mankind; loving my neighbor (wanting the very best for him or her) as I would love myself is just one of them.

Back later with an updated table of contents (the Nazis of the Traditional Youth Network), and 3 very important posts from Part's 1, 2 and 3 of

Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized!

Give it a rest, old windbag. Not what I meant. I meant, you never give up on projecting unfounded facts (lies) onto others.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Give it a rest, old windbag. Not what I meant. I meant, you never give up on projecting unfounded facts (lies) onto others.

Refute them.
1. prove (a statement or theory) to be wrong or false; disprove.

On that note: I don't want you to get all depressed on me GFR7/Scot, so here's something for you to look forward to:

Without a doubt when Patti Jane hits the bottle around 3ish today, he'll return to the thread to add his homoseuxalist 2 cents worth and you'll once again have someone to bond with.

Now doesn't that just brighten up your day buttercup?

 

[GFR7]

Refute them.
1. prove (a statement or theory) to be wrong or false; disprove.

On that note: I don't want you to get all depressed on me GFR7/Scot, so here's something for you to look forward to:

Without a doubt when Patti Jane hits the bottle around 3ish today, he'll return to the thread to add his homoseuxalist 2 cents worth and you'll once again have someone to bond with.

Now doesn't that just brighten up your day buttercup?

Refute what hasn't been proven? As with others, you make 2 claims:

1. That I practice homosexuality
2. That I work for the rainbow campaign

Of course, I know both are false.

However:

How could I refute them?
And how could you prove them?

Just like you will not or cannot refute many peoples' claims that you are a big, fat, closet case, Lamb Bones. :kiss:

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Refute what hasn't been proven? As with others, you make 2 claims:

1. That I practice homosexuality
2. That I work for the rainbow campaign

Of course, I know both are false.

However:

How could I refute them?
And how could you prove them?

1. Being that we're in an internet forum, a person with common sense could only speculate based on the evidence provided (the evidence being your posts which have absolutely disgusting displays of homosexuality, be it through gifs or conversations with other self admitted homosexuals like Uberpod1) that you are a practicing homosexual, and

2. Based on your own words in your posts (being a homosexual journalist, a supporter of homosexual and baby murderer B. Hussein Obama, you've studied all kinds of sexual deviants and hold them up as heroes, and you're constantly attacking someone who has a legitimate way to overturn this madness), that you are indeed a homosexual activist.

Just like you will not or cannot refute many peoples' claims that you are a big, fat,...:

If it will keep you and the other boyz from having sick fantasies about me, then yes, that's exactly what I look like.

 

[Arthur Brain]

Refute what hasn't been proven? As with others, you make 2 claims:

1. That I practice homosexuality
2. That I work for the rainbow campaign

Of course, I know both are false.

However:

How could I refute them?
And how could you prove them?

Just like you will not or cannot refute many peoples' claims that you are a big, fat, closet case, Lamb Bones. :kiss:

Don't feel too bad about it, he insinuates the same about anyone who doesn't agree with either his premise or indeed anything whatsoever. He used to invent lurid innuendo about Wizard Of Oz and I having 'trysts' along with several others and it's landed him in the penalty box a few times. The ironic thing here being why would a supposedly straight man imagine such nonsense to begin with?

 

[GFR7]

Don't feel too bad about it, he insinuates the same about anyone who doesn't agree with either his premise or indeed anything whatsoever. He used to invent lurid innuendo about Wizard Of Oz and I having 'trysts' along with several others and it's landed him in the penalty box a few times. The ironic thing here being why would a supposedly straight man imagine such nonsense to begin with?

Thank you, and you pose an important question. :BRAVO:

Moreover, when aCW points out my "disgusting displays" such as gifs and academic studies, it's as if he is tone-deaf to sardonic expression and satire: Why wouldn't I be trying to hides these things? aCW does not realize that everything is not always as it seems. :chuckle:

Cheers :cheers:
Gianfranco

aCW: You forgot my Arthur Rimbaud avatar! :wave2:

Do you have these plates legal also in Kentucky, Karl?

Spoiler

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Don't feel too bad about it, he insinuates the same about anyone who doesn't agree with either his premise or indeed anything whatsoever.

Only the very obvious ones Art (once upon a time there was a guy who defends homosexuality incessantly in this thread that stated SEVEN times in one post that he's straight...refer to the table of contents for page and post #).

He used to invent lurid innuendo about Wizard Of Oz and I having 'trysts' along with several others and it's landed him in the penalty box a few times. The ironic thing here being why would a supposedly straight man imagine such nonsense to begin with?

Speaking of the Libertarian in denial (who is an expert on Holy Scripture don't cha know) : What is Aaron doing these days other than stopping by and having fun with tags? Perhaps he's down at the Ron Paul compound in Texas helping Ron and Rand prepare refreshments for the next Libertarian convention?

Thank you, and you pose an important question. :BRAVO:

(I second that motion: BRAVO for Art Brain!).

Moreover, when aCW points out my "disgusting displays" such as gifs and academic studies, it's as if he is tone-deaf to sardonic expression and satire: Why wouldn't I be trying to hides these things? aCW does not realize that everything is not always as it seems. :chuckle:

Cheers :cheers:
Gianfranco

There you boyz go again acting like there is something wrong with buggery. Holy cow fellas, you're acting as if contracting AIDS and numerous other diseases that I can't pronounce let alone spell is something to be ashamed of.

What ever happened to 'gay pride'?

 

[GFR7]

What is your experience with tapping, aCW? :think:

 

[Arthur Brain]

Only the very obvious ones Art (once upon a time there was a guy who defends homosexuality incessantly in this thread that stated SEVEN times in one post that he's straight...refer to the table of contents for page and post #).

Well I'm sure there'd have been good reason for it, and I'm sorry to have to burst that fevered little imaginary bubble of yours once again but blokes just 'ain't my thang dude', and as riveting as it would be to trawl through your indescribably entertaining table of bollocks I have more interesting things I could be reading like 'Elevator Maintenance Monthly' etc.

Speaking of the Libertarian in denial (who is an expert on Holy Scripture don't cha know) : What is Aaron doing these days other than stopping by and having fun with tags? Perhaps he's down at the Ron Paul compound in Texas helping Ron and Rand prepare refreshments for the next Libertarian convention?

Not sure who this 'Aaron' character is you're going on about but Wiz seems to be doing just fine.

There you boyz go again acting like there is something wrong with buggery. Holy cow fellas, you're acting as if contracting AIDS and numerous other diseases that I can't pronounce let alone spell is something to be ashamed of.

What ever happened to 'gay pride'?

Oh, I can well believe you're not very adept at either pronunciation or spelling, in fact you're probably as bad at that as you are with discernment, *mockery* and 'figuring' out things like other people's orientation.

Ya see Connie, if any of us were homosexual then why would any of us deny it? You're no threat, even far right conservatives on here distance themselves away from your obsessive lunacy as it's probably too embarrassing to be associated with. This never seems to compute with you though does it?

 

[Arthur Brain]

What is your experience with tapping, aCW? :think:

Well he's 'tapped in the head' so at least that much...

 

[GFR7]

Well he's 'tapped in the head' so at least that much...

:chuckle:

 

[alwight]

1. Being that we're in an internet forum, a person with common sense could only speculate based on the evidence provided (the evidence being your posts which have absolutely disgusting displays of homosexuality, be it through gifs or conversations with other self admitted homosexuals like Uberpod1) that you are a practicing homosexual, and

You pad out this thread with specially selected examples of often salacious material, arguably no more typical of average homosexuals than that which might as easily be trawled up involving atypical heterosexual behaviour, and then expect readers to somehow accept your integrity and honest intent as a gimme?
Pull the other one aCW, your motives are clearly not those of someone with a more clearly polarised sexual orientation, who has no interest in seeing any such erotica from the other side. But are those of someone who needs to believe that their sexual orientation is simply a matter of choice and willpower, rather than being something less than heterosexually polarised due to, in all probability, the genes you happened to be dealt with in this life.
Perhaps if you had the courage to deal with it rather than deny it...? :think:

2. Based on your own words in your posts (being a homosexual journalist, a supporter of homosexual and baby murderer B. Hussein Obama, you've studied all kinds of sexual deviants and hold them up as heroes, and you're constantly attacking someone who has a legitimate way to overturn this madness), that you are indeed a homosexual activist.

legitimate
adjective: legitimate

/lɪˈdʒɪtɪmət/

1. conforming to the law or to rules.
"his claims to legitimate authority"


2. able to be defended with logic or justification; valid.
"a legitimate excuse for being late"

Of course Hitler also had a "legitimate" way of dealing with people he didn't like, by defining his own laws and legitimacy.