WHICH CHURCH WAS HEBREWS WRITTEN TO?

[God's Truth]

Atonement does not mean taking away sins.

Try again. (Hint: Leviticus 16)

You are wrong. You know how anyone can see you are wrong? Because the scriptures say the blood of animals for the forgiveness of sins.

When Jesus forgives our sins, it is sin that is gone.

 

[JudgeRightly]

You are wrong. You know how anyone can see you are wrong? Because the scriptures say the blood of animals for the forgiveness of sins.

When Jesus forgives our sins, it is sin that is gone.

Sorry, but atonement still doesn't mean taking away sins.

That's not the definition of atonement.

Try again. (Hint: Leviticus 16)

 

[God's Truth]

Sorry, but atonement still doesn't mean taking away sins.

That's not the definition of atonement.

Try again. (Hint: Leviticus 16)

You are wrong. No matter how many times you say it you are wrong.

I have scriptures and Jesus Christ who is the Lamb of God.

 

[God's Truth]

Atonement does not mean taking away sins.

Try again. (Hint: Leviticus 16)

Do you and RD want to talk about that scripture?

 

[JudgeRightly]

You are wrong. No matter how many times you say it you are wrong.

So now you're trying to change the definition of atonement?

Atonement DOES NOT MEAN "taking away sins."

I have scriptures and Jesus Christ who is the Lamb of God.

You definitely don't understand those scriptures NOR how they work together.

Try again. (Hint: Leviticus 16)

 

[God's Truth]

So now you're trying to change the definition of atonement?

Atonement DOES NOT MEAN "taking away sins."

Of course it means that.

You definitely don't understand those scriptures NOR how they work together.

Try again. (Hint: Leviticus 16)

Let's talk about Leviticus 16.

 

[God's Truth]

JudgeRightly and Right Divider

​​​​​​​Let's talk about Leviticus 16. I can hardly wait.

 

[JudgeRightly]

Of course it means that.

So post the definition here. I'll wait.

Atonement DOES NOT MEAN taking away sins.

Let's talk about Leviticus 16.

Where does Scripture talk about an animal taking away sins? (Hint: Leviticus 16)

 

[Right Divider]

You are wrong. You know how anyone can see you are wrong? Because the scriptures say the blood of animals for the forgiveness of sins.

Animal blood did NOT forgive sin nor "take it away"

Heb 10:4 KJV For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.


​

 

[Right Divider]

Do you and RD want to talk about that scripture?

Yes... Leviticus 16

 

[Right Divider]

JudgeRightly and Right Divider

Let's talk about Leviticus 16. I can hardly wait.

I already have. You consistently ignored it and made false accusations.

 

[God's Truth]

So post the definition here. I'll wait.

Atonement DOES NOT MEAN taking away sins.



Where does Scripture talk about an animal taking away sins? (Hint: Leviticus 16)

Jesus' blood atones for our sins.

 

[God's Truth]

Animal blood did NOT forgive sin nor "take it away"

Heb 10:4 KJV For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.


​

Keep reading...but God commanded it in order to have a relationship with Him and be forgiven.

 

[God's Truth]

Yes... Leviticus 16

Go ahead and talk about it instead of keep saying Leviticus 16.

You don't seem to get it that there were two goats and one had to be killed.

 

[God's Truth]

I already have. You consistently ignored it and made false accusations.

You said no animal was killed. You don't know that there were TWO GOATS and ONE had to be killed.

 

[JudgeRightly]

Jesus' blood atones for our sins.

More misdirection from you.

Where does Scripture talk about an animal taking away sins? (Hint: Leviticus 16)

 

[JudgeRightly]

Go ahead and talk about it instead of keep saying Leviticus 16.

You don't seem to get it that there were two goats and one had to be killed.

Which goat takes away sin? The one that was killed or the one that lived?

 

[Right Divider]

Go ahead and talk about it instead of keep saying Leviticus 16.

I've quoted the relevant part several times. You've done nothing.

You don't seem to get it that there were two goats and one had to be killed.

The one that got killed was not the one that took away the sins.

 

[Right Divider]

You said no animal was killed.

No, I did NOT. You're LYING AGAIN.

You don't know that there were TWO GOATS and ONE had to be killed.

Yes, I do... the one that died was not the one that TAKES AWAY SINS.

 

[God's Truth]

Which goat takes away sin? The one that was killed or the one that lived?

One goat died and one goat was sent to the wilderness.

Jesus died and lives.

Are you trying to say one goat during the ceremony didn't have to die?

There was NO SENDING a goat out in the wilderness UNLESS the other goat was killed.