I am really getting a kick out of this site having a "flamer" smilie.
snip...
Off topic here, but that is really funny, hadn't occurred to me before. I wonder how many forums have "flamer" emoticons? :shocked:
LOL!
:first: Knight
I am really getting a kick out of this site having a "flamer" smilie.
snip...
Yes, agriculture has always been difficult in the middle east.and thats a shame
Here's what I think you meant, 'do you think we need to use laws from the Bible as criminal laws?'
We already do that, murder is illegal, stealing is illegal, homosexuality used to be illegal, why not again?
Yes, agriculture has always been difficult in the middle east.
Uh... dude... drug users ARE stoned. :duh:drug users should be stoned
drug users should be stoned
Darn... you just tipped the "stupid meter" and were banned.You think you are funny, but the pernicious use of drugs is undermining America. That and small furry animals.
I met a guy at the coffeeshop once, looked all hippy and his job was to paint funny colored bicycles all day long and he smoked some strange stuff. That and the paint fumes made him so wierd. His laugh was the bark of a small dog. Not good for the country.
No, what you said was 'criminalize parts of the Bible', which sounds like you are asking if we'd like to outlaw Psalms and maybe Galatians. But no, we don't want to criminalize parts of the Bible.No, I meant what I said - concubines and second wives seem fine in the OT. Do we need to criminalize this?
again, work on your reading comprehension.Uh... dude... drug users ARE stoned. :duh:
I am not your lap dog.again, work on your reading comprehension.
and kindly answer the question i asked you earlier.
I am not your lap dog.
What question did you ask? Was it a stupid question? Because if it was, maybe I just laughed when I read it and moved on. :mock: killswitch
Do you own a Bible? Look it up!what punishments befits the gays?
OK, you and Delmar, let's hear it from you.
Toss the Constitution for Enyart's version? Why or why not?
Why should adultery be criminalized?
[Jesus]He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.[/Jesus]In your specific terminology and in your narrow definition of what it is to be a Christian, no.
And you still can't spell judgment.:doh: No wonder you don't know how to judge rightly.But then, most professed Christians wouldn't fit your definition, either. I guess we'll have to leave that up to God to decide. I trust His judgement more than I do yours.
That's not creative, it's ignorant.Heh. You should see how long it took me to switch from using "car house" to designate "garage." Creative spelling is my forte.
I am perfect because He has made me perfect.I don't claim to be perfect or better than I am - AND I don't claim to know the one and only way to Heaven. That's the difference. I fully admit that there's a lot that I don't know, and I'm OK with that. God is beyond my capacity to understand. I know that, I freely admit that, I take joy in that. Who would ever want to limit God by man's understanding?
Trust in the LORD with all your heart,What I'm NOT OK with is somebody who claims to understand God through two thousand years of interpretation and re-interpretation and re-re-interpretation, shoving their own narrow understanding down my or anyone else's throat. You don't have any claim on sanctity, or understanding. Any more than I do. You have a human mind, not a divine one, and are limited in what you are capable of knowing. I trust God more.
God's commands are perfectly OK with me. Who am I to argue? I am His creation. Not the other way around.And that's OK with you? Christian Sharia?
Yes, I would. I don't trust any legal document that can be changed via majority vote.Interesting. So reconcile that with the US Constitution. Or would you like to see it tossed on the trash heap of history?
Originally posted by sierramoron to me in a rep
you're a loser in the sight of God by supporting this work of the enemy. I plan to leave this brood of vipers or get banned proclaining the Truth
Looks like he got banned for lying, instead.:wave: :loser:
Looks like he got banned for lying, instead.
:mock:Sierrasam