ECT What is the true root objection to MAD?
- Thread starter musterion
- Start date
I believe that contention with MAD stems over the fact that there is a gospel to the circumcision and a gospel to the uncircumcision.
Galatians 2:7 King James Version (KJV)
7 But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;
If it were not so, why would scripture address it?
Galatians 2:7 King James Version (KJV)
7 But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;
If it were not so, why would scripture address it?
dreadknought
New member
I think it does. No orthodox Godhead, no saving Gospel.
Levolor
New member
As I see it too.
About as long as we're going to ignore straw men. :think:
IMJerusha
New member
It did address it. "There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus." Galatians 3:28
"For there is no difference between Jew and Gentile--the same Lord is Lord of all and richly blesses all who call on him, for, 'Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.' " Romans 10:12-13
Any doctrine that divides Yeshua as well as the Body is off. To intimate in any way that what Yeshua taught while He walked among us is different than what He taught Paul also paints a division that He would not tolerate and casts a pall on Yeshua's integrity as Mashiach. We are either for Him or we are against Him. We don't get to divide Him and those in Him.
dreadknought
New member
Hm, strawmen. Since your on the correct end of the progressives, the strawmen have 2 left feet..... and check your Godhead.
What the hell are you talking about?
IMJerusha
New member
I do beg your pardon, I meant that I don't think it matters to them.
IMJerusha
New member
I wouldn't begin to know how to break that question down to any more elementary level.
I don't get what you were referring to either, enlighten us.
You are biased.
She defends herself that way only after the most viscious attacks on her, as you Madists gang up on her.
You Madists defend your false doctrine with insults like John W who you praise, and then if one should say something in return then you condemn them for that.
In short you MADists are hypocrites .
I have not found one MADist on this board who is not rude and arrogant. It goes with the false doctrine.
I am not trying to cure you, it is impossible for you to escape your sickness because there is no room for confession of your sin in your doctrine.
You sin and then say "what sin"
LA
heir
TOL Subscriber
I don't see one soul that Christ did not die for!
2 Corinthians 5:19 To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation.
2 Corinthians 5:21 For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.
The scripture saith: and if Christ be not raised, your faith is in vain; ye are yet in your sins.
but the good news FOR ALL is that Christ was raised!
1 Corinthians 15:3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
1 Corinthians 15:4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
1 Corinthians 15:17 And if Christ be not raised, your faith is vain; ye are yet in your sins.
Romans 4:25 Who was delivered for our offences, and was raised again for our justification.
And we can see from 1 Timothy 2:4-6 KJV) that it's God's will that all men be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth for there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; Who gave Himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.
So I'm really not sure what point you are trying to make except that you believe the faith and finished work of the Lord Jesus Christ was insufficient for God to reconcile the world unto Himself.
Last edited:
IMJerusha
New member
I'm sorry Angel, I think it is self explanatory.
I don't see what knight said here that she is agreeing or disagreeing with, show me. I don't see where knight posted here at all. Post the context of what you are talking about.
What you said makes no sense except in your own mind.
IMJerusha
New member
Either I give you more credit than you give yourself or you're playing me and I really thought we were past that, but considering your last sentence, maybe not.
Hello out there, how hard is it to quote what knight said, along with her comments so it makes sense, or do you just have a personal problem with tambora and that came from somewhere else, if you cant make sense, its better not to speak.
heir
TOL Subscriber
Speak for yourself. I've never said any such thing.
IMJerusha
New member
I am speaking for myself. You've told me repeatedly that my faith in Yeshua doesn't cut the MAD grade.
heir
TOL Subscriber
So you're not "MAD". Are you saved? And if so, what is the gospel of your salvation?