Why does inability to explain how man is responsible in the face of Godly predetermination trump inability to explain the maintenance of God's Sovereignty in the face of man's ability to choose?
Why do you choose to exercise faith in the former? Aren't you thereby declaring the latter impossible? If so, why?
God created the angels with the ability to make a choice contrary with their nature, they were created in a state of unconfirmed holiness. Once those angels that sinned rebelled they were confirmed unholy while the angels that did not sin were confirmed in holiness and are no longer able to sin.
Adam was created righteous. He was created in a state of unconfirmed holiness with the ability to choose contrary to his nature. But for Adam, unlike the angels that sinned God provided salvation. Adam hid himself and would not have sought God, he could not seek God because sin had touched every part of him he had become dead to God. God took it upon Himself to go and find Adam.
Did God not know beforehand what Adam was going to do in the garden? Yes God knee, God not only knows the future, He knows everything simultaneously at the same time, He is omniscient. Gathering what can be known of God by what and only what God has chosen to reveal to man concerning Himself, we can see that God allowed for the fall of Adam to take place. That does not mean that God predestined Adam to sin. It means that God created Adam with an ability to choose against his created nature. If anything, this shows that there is only one being that is good only one being that never sins and in whom is no darkness, only one God. Everything else is a creation.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk