Like I just said . . . yer not gonna check nuthin.[/quote
I'm quite a fan of checking sources. It's one of the reasons I'm having trouble keeping my usual posting level now that my net access is limited. I even check the sites that Ninevah posts, and that woman is queen of the links.
Uh, that's pretty much a given, ninny.
You'd think so, wouldn't you?
Denial is a beautiful thang. And it's so much easier to get over the past when you can see others' lives as trashed as your own. What a rotten lump you are.
I went through my period of denial. I discarded it with the rest of my early teenage angst.
Haven't quoted these to you, moron, as it would be pearls before a pig.
You sure do put in the effort before calling it quits, don't you?
I'm more than happy to
discuss Scripture. I am a religious studies student, after all.
I don't need Scriptures to determine the destruction wrought by homoism. I can read FBI and other statistics (which you can google if you dare -- but you won't).
You can read them, but you seem incapable of linking to them. Or posting them. Or even sourcing them more specifically than "FBI and other statistics".
Statistics are the law of averages.
Statistics are a method of displaying information which can very easily be used to mislead the public.
And I've already said that this site is full of them, as well as you ability to do a search yourself.
I've been reading the posts on this site for quite a while now. I know what they say.
See, I don't see the need to provide you anything. Why? Am I afraid of not finding what I need to make my case? No. But I've had these discussions with pigs like you and even when confronted with the truth you always throw it off and divert, ignore, or provide other "studies" . . . and when those studies are demolished by further study of the sources you then resort other unpleasantness. Typical. No, I won't help you look for anything. It's enough that you already know these things and hate hearing about it.
You know nothing about me. This is the only conversation we've ever had, save for my well wishes in a post you made about your mother in law. I haven't been posting regularly in the time that you've been here. Yet you claim to know how I'll respond to something?
You're way off. It's really kind of amusing.
I've pointed out repeatedly that I'm asking YOU what YOU are basing YOUR opinion on. That isn't something I can google. Since you're obviously not going to answer the question or provide anything more intelligent than misdirection and insults, I'm giving up. I'm sure you'll continue to rant. Have at it.
A thousand pardons. You led me to believe you were a fomo:
No, I led you to believe that I was not heterosexual, which I'm not. You jumped to a conclusion and hurled insults at me based on it.
I was mistaken. You're a bi-sexual then? A backslidden fomo? Well, glad to clear that up.
Quite.
When you say you doubt I've polled every reprobate I've talked with, you're intimating that you think I'm lying.
Nope. I'm sure you think you're telling the truth.
You agreed with me that you haven't polled every homosexual you've ever met. For all I know, you've polled two, and they were wearing T-Shirts that said "I'm a homosexual victim of abuse: ASK ME HOW!"
See? That's the thing about statistics. They bend easily to fit whatever you want them to say.
Just as you don't care to research statistics by FBI, medical institutes, CDC,
I'm in the middle of degree. If I didn't care to research statistics, I would have shot myself by now.
I won't be researching the why's and whatfore's of you folks. I've probably got it figured out anyway -- hey, this isn't rocket surgery.
Rocket surgery, hey?
You guys aren't that deep.
I'm sure some of "us" aren't. People have a tendancy to be shallow.
Duh. Could care less about those Christians who "live and let live" . . . that's almost as big problem as you perverts.
True, some take the attitude of "live and let live". Some just have patience.
