Arthur Brain
Well-known member
the opposite of nazi is freedom and capitalism
Another example of clueless. That basketball gif kinda suits you.
the opposite of nazi is freedom and capitalism
Of course not. This is an example of why I use my ignore list once a person confirms they are capable of nothing more than trolling ...
What, do you think the Republicans would magically end abortion?
This will likely be the last post I make on this thread unless I am shocked at the intellectual honesty that someone unexpectedly shows up here with....
The right vs. left, what's the difference? I cannot say it better than other already has...
.
The right consists of free-market capitalists, who think the individual is the primary political unit, believes in property rights, and is generally distrustful of the administrative state and government solutions to social problems. They view family and civil institutions such as church as needed checks on state power. These people don’t think government should force a business to provide employee birth control or think law should coerce bakers to make cakes against their conscience. They think the solution to bad speech is more speech; the solution to gun violence is more guns. These people talk about “freedom” — the method individual decisions. (The counterexample might be gay marriage but that is a positive right (give me something) instead of a negative right (leave me alone)).
The left believes the opposite. These people are distrustful of the excesses and inequality capitalism produces. They give primacy to group rights and identity. They believe factors like race, ethnicity, and gender compose the primary political units. They don’t believe in strong property rights. They believe it is the government’s responsibility to solve social problems. They call for public intervention to “equalize” disparities and render our social fabric more inclusive (as they define it). They believe the free market has failed to solve issues like campaign finance, income inequality, minimum wage, access to healthcare, and righting past injustices. These people talk about “democracy” — the method of collective decisions.
By these definitions the Nazis were firmly on the left. National Socialism was a collectivist authoritarian movement run by “social justice warriors.” That this brand of “justice” benefited only some based on immutable characteristics perfectly aligns with the modern brand. The Nazi ideal embraced identity politics based on the primacy of the people or “volk” and invoked state-based solutions for every possible problem. It was nation-based socialism — the nation being especially important to those who bled in the Great War.
As Hayek wrote in 1933, the year the Nazis took power:
t is more than probable that the real meaning of the German revolution is that the long dreaded expansion of communism into the heart of Europe has taken place but is not recognized because the fundamental similarity of methods and ideas is hidden by the difference in phraseology and the privileged groups. - ‘The Road to Serfdom’ - emphasis added
Nazism and socialism competed with the Enlightenment-based individualism of Locke, Smith, Montesquieu, and others who profoundly influenced the American founding and define the modern American right at its best.
These thinkers fit easily with Hayek’s Austrian School of Economics, which opposed both the imperialist German Historical School and the Marxists. - from The Nazis Were Leftists, Deal With It by Paul H Jossey
The fact that Nazism is left wing is the biggest no brainer in all of political theory and thought! It's perfectly asinine to think anything else! The only way anyone can suggest otherwise is if they are either lying in order to distance the left from the embarrassment of history that the Nazis are and instead pin that embarrassment onto their political rivals or else its because they are ignoramuses who believe what they are told by others on the left instead of reading and thus knowing for themselves not only the facts of history but of modern political thought. In short, the notion that Nazism is right wing is a product of the public school system, the decidedly left wing professoriate in higher education and the left wing media complex (i.e. the left in general).
Clete
THE SOCIALIST ROOTS OF NAZISM
All anti-liberal forces are combining against everything that is
liberal. A. Moeller van den Bruck.
It is a common mistake to regard National-Socialism as a mere
revolt against reason, an irrational movement without intel-
lectual background. If that were so, the movement would be
much less dangerous than it is. But nothing could be further
from the truth or more misleading. The doctrines of National-
Socialism are the culmination of a long evolution of thought, a
process in which thinkers who have had great influence far
beyond the confines of Germany have taken part. Whatever one
may think of the premises from which they started, it cannot be
denied that the men who produced the new doctrines were
powerful writers who left the impress of their ideas on the
whole of European thought. Their system was developed with
ruthless consistency. Once one accepts the premises from which
it starts, there is no escape from its logic. It is simply collectivism
freed from all traces of an individualist tradition which might
hamper its realisation.
Though in this development German thinkers have taken the
lead, they were by no means alone. Thomas Carlyle and Houston
Stewart Chamberlain, Auguste Comte and Georges Sorel are as
much a part of that continuous development as any Germans.
The development of this strand of thought within Germany has
been well traced recently by Mr. R. D. Butler in his study of The
Roots of National Socialism. But although its persistence there
through a hundred and fifty years in almost unchanged and
ever-recurring form, which emerges from that study, is rather
frightening, it is easy to exaggerate the importance these ideas
had in Germany before 1914. They were only one strand of
thought among a people then perhaps more varied in its views
than any other. And they were on the whole represented by a
small minority and held in as great contempt by the majority of
Germans as they were in other countries.
What, then, caused these views held by a reactionary minority
finally to gain the support of the great majority of Germans and
practically the whole of her youth? It was not merely the defeat,
the suffering, and the wave of nationalism which led to their
success. Still less was the cause, as so many people wish to
believe, a capitalist reaction against the advance of socialism. On
the contrary, the support which brought these ideas to power
came precisely from the socialist camp. It was certainly not
through the bourgeoisie, but rather the absence of a strong
bourgeoisie, by which they were helped to power.
The doctrines which had guided the ruling elements in Ger-
many for the past generation were not opposed to the socialism
in Marxism, but to the liberal elements contained in it, its inter-
nationalism and its democracy. And as it became increasingly
clear that it was just these elements which formed obstacles to
the realisation of socialism, the socialists of the left approached
more and more to those of the right. It was the union of the
anti-capitalist forces of the right and the left, the fusion of radical
and conservative socialism, which drove out from Germany
everything that was liberal.
The connection between socialism and nationalism in Ger-
many was close from the beginning. It is significant that the most
important ancestors of National~Socialism-Fichte, Rodbertus,
and Lassall-are at the same time acknowledged fathers of social-
ism. While theoretical socialism in its Marxist form was directing
the German labour movement, the authoritarian and nationalist
element receded for a time into the background. But not for
1long. From 1914 onwards there arose from the ranks of Marxist
socialism one teacher after another who led, not the conserva-
tives and reactionaries, but the hardworking labourer and idealist
youth into the national-socialist fold. It was only thereafter that
the tide of nationalist socialism attained major importance and
rapidly grew into the Hitlerian doctrine. The war hysteria of
1914, which, just because of the German defeat, was never fully
cured, is the beginning of the modern development which pro-
duced National-Socialism, and it was largely with the assistance
of old socialists that it rose during this period.
The Road to Serfdom Friedrich Hayek pp. 171-173
Those denying that the Nazi's were/are socialists are interesting with their insistence on denying reality. Your lack of knowledge of history is astounding.
Germany was already a socialist nation before WW1. German thought leaders, i.e. their leading intellectuals saw WW1 as a war between socialism and classical liberalism, i.e. individualism. Germany had been socialist in nature for approximately 30 years before WW1.
Notice the relationship between socialism and German history. Also notice the Nazi's were supported by the existing socialists. In effect all the Nazi's actually did was add nationalism to socialism. It was the Marxist true believers that brought the youth into the Nazi camp. That the socialists were great advocates for National Socialism it is impossible to be intellectually honest and claim the Nazi's were not socialist in nature and practice. If they were not, the pre-existing socialists in Germany would have opposed them rather than help lead the population into the Nazi camp.
Those denying that the Nazi's were/are socialists are interesting with their insistence on denying reality. Your lack of knowledge of history is astounding.
Germany was already a socialist nation before WW1. German thought leaders, i.e. their leading intellectuals saw WW1 as a war between socialism and classical liberalism, i.e. individualism. Germany had been socialist in nature for approximately 30 years before WW1.
Notice the relationship between socialism and German history. Also notice the Nazi's were supported by the existing socialists. In effect all the Nazi's actually did was add nationalism to socialism. It was the Marxist true believers that brought the youth into the Nazi camp. That the socialists were great advocates for National Socialism it is impossible to be intellectually honest and claim the Nazi's were not socialist in nature and practice. If they were not, the pre-existing socialists in Germany would have opposed them rather than help lead the population into the Nazi camp.
This is the same as your other "last" post in this thread, said post being #50. Repeating the same stuff doesn't alter the facts. Credible sources place Nazis on the far right, because that's what they were, just as wingnut neo Nazis, white supremacists along with folk who think homosexuals should be executed etc. They even identify as being on the far right...
:dizzy:
Those denying that the Nazi's were/are socialists are interesting with their insistence on denying reality. Your lack of knowledge of history is astounding.
Germany was already a socialist nation before WW1. German thought leaders, i.e. their leading intellectuals saw WW1 as a war between socialism and classical liberalism, i.e. individualism. Germany had been socialist in nature for approximately 30 years before WW1.
Notice the relationship between socialism and German history. Also notice the Nazi's were supported by the existing socialists. In effect all the Nazi's actually did was add nationalism to socialism. It was the Marxist true believers that brought the youth into the Nazi camp. That the socialists were great advocates for National Socialism it is impossible to be intellectually honest and claim the Nazi's were not socialist in nature and practice. If they were not, the pre-existing socialists in Germany would have opposed them rather than help lead the population into the Nazi camp.
None of them will notice any such relationship because none of them can be bothered to read that much material on a subject withwhich they disagree.
Are you whining about me reposting it doesn't do any more to refute it than was done last time I posted it. Nazism is left wing. Get over it or stop being left wing!
Socialism sucks
60 years ago, Communists seized power in Cuba and all private business and industry were nationalized and the Cuban people have lived under Socialism ever since.
This thread is about Nazism dude...
socialism sucks , national socialism sucks
Saying it doesn't make it so nor does it even begin to refute what has already been argued.Nazism isn't socialism.
You mean indoctrinate yourself with the party line, right? Anyone who disagrees with you should be silenced. That's pretty much the mode of the entire left at the moment. Just like their Nazi brothers and sisters.Educate yourself.
One's policy concerning homos has nothing to do with the form of your government. Anyone guilty of a capital crime should be executed upon conviction regardless of which form of government is in power.Question: Do you think that homosexuality should be a capital crime?
Saying it doesn't make it so nor does it even begin to refute what has already been argued.
You mean indoctrinate yourself with the party line, right? Anyone who disagrees with you should be silenced. That's pretty much the mode of the entire left at the moment. Just like their Nazi brothers and sisters.
One's policy concerning homos has nothing to do with the form of your government. Anyone guilty of a capital crime should be executed upon conviction regardless of which form of government is in power.
hitler wrote "I am a German nationalist. This means that I proclaim my nationality. My whole thought and action belongs to it. I am a socialist. I see no class and no social estate before me, but that community of the Folk, made up of people who are linked by blood, united by a language, and subject to a same general fate."