Trump's sexual history doesn't count

musterion

Well-known member
Says the guy still talking about Bill Clinton. You have declared it to be of no interest. So much so, in fact, that you started a whole thread about your disinterest. Of course, if no one cared, we wouldn't be talking about this and you wouldn't feel compelled to start threads trying to dismiss the charges, and the hypocrisy you use to do so.




He's been out of office for 18 years, and you're just assuming that the people who are upset with Trump now would have defended Clinton then.

Trump is in office now, and he's lying about these (potentially illegal, definitely scummy) affairs this week. Still no problem?

He was a Democrat when they happened.

Besides which, why are you creating an arbitrary cut-off for Clinton but not for Trump? Is it because you're just a hypocrite and a liar?
 

rexlunae

New member
He was a Democrat when they happened.

And what about the cover-up, and all the lies about what happened? When were those?

Besides which, why are you creating an arbitrary cut-off for Clinton but not for Trump? Is it because you're just a hypocrite and a liar?

Yes, so arbitrary. In office versus not in office is such an unreasonable consideration.

You do realize that Trump's affair with Stormy Daniels is more recent than Clinton's affairs that we know about, right?
 

Grosnick Marowbe

New member
Hall of Fame
And what about the cover-up, and all the lies about what happened? When were those?



Yes, so arbitrary. In office versus not in office is such an unreasonable consideration.

You do realize that Trump's affair with Stormy Daniels is more recent than Clinton's affairs that we know about, right?



Why would you, a devout Athiest care about Adultery, etc? After all, you don't have any real or imagined set of moral or spiritual guidelines. You just happen to hate Trump. If this were Obama or Bill Clinton having affairs, you couldn't care less. It's Trump that makes you so angry. You, no doubt suffer from 'Soreloseritis.' And, for that, you have at least a modicum of my empathy. I know you're suffering, however, why not suffer in silence?
 

annabenedetti

like marbles on glass
Nothing says Christian Love like fantasizing about my death.


Isn't that the truth.

I remember saying that TOL was a microcosm, and I was told no, the Christians who talked like that here were an aberration, not reflective of Christianity as a whole. I didn't agree then and would agree even less now. I spent a couple months elsewhere reading what Christians had to say and that other place was even worse than here. It's not just a TOL thing, it's a far-right fundamentalist Christian thing.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Isn't that the truth.

I remember saying that TOL was a microcosm, and I was told no, the Christians who talked like that here were an aberration, not reflective of Christianity as a whole. I didn't agree then and would agree even less now. I spent a couple months elsewhere reading what Christians had to say and that other place was even worse than here. It's not just a TOL thing, it's a far-right fundamentalist Christian thing.

Sometimes Chick tracts aren't very far from the mark. If I wanna see unthinking, ignorant, cold, callous and sometimes flat out bonkers attitudes on display then one of the first ports of call is far right Christian fundamentalism. Rarely "disappointed"...

95e.png
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
You are a sententious dolt.

Says the guy with the putrid sig, who has no love or empathy for anybody and pretty much encapsulates fundamentalism with an added sprinkle of insidiousness and vileness to boot. Look at the the way you pompously preach and blather on doofus. Then replace your irony meter.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
What part of it is false?

Try all of it. Just typical "hellfire & brimstone" fundie dogma that typifies cruelty and unthinking. Your rancid little note about "most will be very surprised" is just the icing on the cake. There's no love about you whatsoever.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Be specific, you lazy narrow-minded harridan.

What about "all of it" is not specific enough for you? Hell is the 'grave' so everyone checks into there dude including you, it's called death. You seem to conflate "hell" with the lake of fire which is obviously metaphor and not a literal burning lake as 'hell/hades' and "death" are cast into it, but in fundyville it's often simply a place of burning suffering. You're the last person to talk about being 'lazy' or 'narrow minded' when you obviously can't or are unwilling to think outside of your doctrinal little box. Still, a doctrine of other people suffering as such fits your callous nature all ends up.

Clear now? Anything else tripping you up?
 
Top