Trump's sexual history doesn't count

rexlunae

New member
[/I][/B]

Why would you, a devout Athiest care about Adultery, etc?

As for the adultery, I don't care much about that. It's a data point speaking to character, but Trump is far from the only person with that character flaw. But I do care about honesty, and legality, and campaign finance, and the national security implications of having a political leader with something he'll do anything to hide.

After all, you don't have any real or imagined set of moral or spiritual guidelines.

If that were true, it would make my life quite a bit easier. It's also a pretty hard notion to take seriously from a Trump supporter.

You just happen to hate Trump.

I hate Trump because of what he does. He's a cruel and dangerous man.

If this were Obama or Bill Clinton having affairs, you couldn't care less.

Not true, and you're just making things up.

It's Trump that makes you so angry.

Well, it's true that this Stormy Daniels stuff is way down my list of things I care about related to Trump. But this is important, and frankly it's telling that so many people who spent much of the last administration of fabricating false conspiracies around President Obama now accuse Trump's critics of motivated reasoning.

You, no doubt suffer from 'Soreloseritis.' And, for that, you have at least a modicum of my empathy. I know you're suffering, however, why not suffer in silence?

We didn't lose, your guy cheated, and it's all collapsing around him now.
 

Grosnick Marowbe

New member
Hall of Fame
As for the adultery, I don't care much about that. It's a data point speaking to character, but Trump is far from the only person with that character flaw. But I do care about honesty, and legality, and campaign finance, and the national security implications of having a political leader with something he'll do anything to hide.



If that were true, it would make my life quite a bit easier.



I hate Trump because of what he does. He's a cruel and dangerous man.



Not true, and you're just making things up.



Well, it's true that this Stormy Daniels stuff is way down my list of things I care about related to Trump. But this is important, and frankly it's telling that so many people who spent much of the last administration of fabricating false conspiracies around President Obama now accuse Trump's critics of motivated reasoning.



We didn't lose, your guy cheated, and it's all collapsing around him now.

None the less, Trump will win a second term, count on it. :rotfl:
 

eider

Well-known member
On analyzing you?

Yep. You'd lose yer pennies on any bet you placed about me.

But tell me, since the thread is all about politicians sexual activities being strictly private matters which only cheap nasty journalists and others would focus upon, would this include gay, transgender or trans-sexual politicians?
 

Catholic Crusader

Kyrie Eleison
Banned
Yep. You'd lose yer pennies on any bet you placed about me.

But tell me, since the thread is all about politicians sexual activities being strictly private matters which only cheap nasty journalists and others would focus upon, would this include gay, transgender or trans-sexual politicians?

Nope because those conditions are indicative of a mental disorder.
 

eider

Well-known member
Nope because those conditions are indicative of a mental disorder.

How I've missed the joy of reading your posts........ the love and humanity, flowing onto the screen........

Anyway...... So...... Where any cheap nasty journalist, or any cheap nasty others, want to trash a politician's or any other's personal life, loves and privacies, all they need to do is claim that they are simply warning of a mental disorder? I'm afraid that this leaves cheap nasty people free to write whatever they like.

Obviously I wouldn't comment upon the President's personal life because I think that he's one of the sanest, smartest, most moral, gallant and decent people in the country, so enough said there....
... but where a cheap nasty journalist wanted an easy buck for a quick 'wow' in a mob tabloid would it be acceptable if he reported that a politician had, say, paid a prostitute for sex, or something like that? I mean, is that ok? Would you defend a bloke for paying for sex? Would you pay for sex? Have you ever paid for sex?
 

Catholic Crusader

Kyrie Eleison
Banned
........since the thread is all about politicians sexual activities being strictly private matters which only cheap nasty journalists and others would focus upon, would this include gay, transgender or trans-sexual politicians?
Nope because those conditions are indicative of a mental disorder.
How I've missed the joy of reading your posts........ the love and humanity, flowing onto the screen........ ...

Thats all I had to read. Your response represents everything that is wrong with society today. I state a simple fact without passion or prejudice and with no emotion involved at all, and you react with misplaced emotion, upset that there is no "love" in what I said. You need to try something new: Try thinking with your brains and not your glands.

I have nothing against homosexuals. You can see me defending them constantly in that idiotic thread about criminalizing homosexuality. If I were to say that someone is an alcoholic or a kleptomaniac or something else and that they suffer from some issue, you would not give that a second thought. You might even agree that they need help. But when I state the same truth about homosexuals or trandgenders, your liberal panties get all in a wad. That's your problem, not mine.

Homosexuals are similar to alcoholics, in that they suffer from a condition that has no cure but can be kept in check with support. Their condition makes them want to engage in destructive acts, and from a Biblical point of view, sinful acts. Now if I saw an alcoholic and told him he needed help, most people would agree that I did the right thing, and that there is no hate or lack of humanity involved in me telling him that. But if I say that homosexuals need help, people like you crawl out of the cracks and accuse me of all kinds of ignorant things, when in fact I am the only person who has the courage to tell a homosexual the truth - again, without passion or prejudice and with no emotion involved at all, just the truth.

It is YOU who has no "love and humanity" because you enable people with disorders. I'll bet you support those clean needle programs for addicts. Ohhh, yes, how humane. "You are an addict sir? Here, have a clean needle. Go kill yourself without getting an infection"

People like you are the destroyers of homosexuals immortal souls. I am the opposite.

You have a wonderful day sir. Go with God.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

eider

Well-known member
Thats all I had to read. Your response represents everything that is wrong with society today. I state a simple fact without passion or prejudice and with no emotion involved at all, and you react with misplaced emotion, upset that there is no "love" in what I said. You need to try something new: Try thinking with your brains and not your glands.

I have nothing against homosexuals. You can see me defending them constantly in that idiotic thread about criminalizing homosexuality. If I were to say that someone is an alcoholic or a kleptomaniac or something else and that they suffer from some issue,you would not give that a second thought. You might even egreethat they need help. But when I state the same truth about hopmosexuals or trandgenders, your liberal panties get all in a wad. That's your problem, not mine.

Homosexuals are similar to alcoholics, in that they suffer from a conditions that has no cure but can be kept in check with support. Their condition makes them want to engage in destructive acts, and from a Biblical point of view, sinful acts. Now if I saw an alcoholic and told him he needed help, most people would agree that I did the right thing, and that there is no hate or lack of humanity involved in me telling him that. But if I say that homosexuals need help, people like you crawl out of the cracks and accuse me of all kinds of ignorant things, when in fact I am the only person who has the courage to tell a homosexual the truth - again, without passion or prejudice and with no emotion involved at all, just the truth.

It is YOU who has no "love and humanity" because you enable people with disorders. I'll be you support those clean needle programs for addicts. Ohhh, yes, how humane. "You are an addict sir? Here, have a clean needle. Go kill yourself without getting an infection"

People like you are the destroyers of homosexuals immortal souls. I am the opposite.

You have a wonderful day sir. Go with God.

How I love the way that you write......
I say it again:- ................. the love and humanity, flowing onto the screen........ ...

But that simple compliment lead you into saying such surprisings things?

I know you didn't mean them all...... just know it. But you didn't answer my question, which was not about gays, but prostitutes. I ask again:- Is it ok to pay a prostitute for sex?
Maybe I touched a sore spot or something?
 

Catholic Crusader

Kyrie Eleison
Banned
How I love the way that you write......
I say it again:- ................. the love and humanity, flowing onto the screen........ ...

But that simple compliment lead you into saying such surprisings things?

I know you didn't mean them all...... just know it. But you didn't answer my question, which was not about gays, but prostitutes. I ask again:- Is it ok to pay a prostitute for sex?
Maybe I touched a sore spot or something?

1) I mean everything I say, except for the typos, which I fixed.

2) Is it ok to pay a prostitute for sex? It is illegal, so NO. Biblically it is also a sin, so again, NO.

But as a side note: Going to a prostitute does not involve any perversion, unless you are paying for perverted acts. It is normal for a man to desire sex with a woman. Its just a sin to have sex outside of marriage, and prostitution is illegal.
 

rexlunae

New member
1) I mean everything I say, except for the typos, which I fixed.

2) Is it ok to pay a prostitute for sex? It is illegal, so NO. Biblically it is also a sin, so again, NO.

But as a side note: Going to a prostitute does not involve any perversion, unless you are paying for perverted acts. It is normal for a man to desire sex with a woman. Its just a sin to have sex outside of marriage, and prostitution is illegal.

They had sex. Trump was married, she was not.
 

Catholic Crusader

Kyrie Eleison
Banned
They had sex. Trump was married, she was not.

You mean Trump committed a sin?? Oh my God, its the end of the world.
I've had sex with hundreds of girls. So what. I used to be a road musician in my 20's and 30's. Now I am a believing Catholic in my 50's

Again, so what.

Be careful the measure by which you judge others, for it is by that measure that you will be judged. The condemnation you continually heap upon Trump will be heaped upon you. The best thing you could do for yourself is shut your piehole and seek forgiveness.

That goes for the rest of you hatemongers too.
 
Top