Trump sez: Transgenders B gone!

[glorydaz]

Neither is child molestation

Or rape

Easier than between two consenting adults.

 

[ok doser]

So?

 

[glorydaz]

What, you think evidence has to come from the vicinity of the act itself?



Never said it was.

I said it was EVIDENCE, a WITNESS, that the person is committing adultery, not a crime in and of itself. Nor is it proof of it either.

Flirting with someone else who is married and/or while you yourself are married is wrong, and is a good indication that there may be sexual relations going on, or that it is leading to a sexual relationship.



Um, no, because lust is not a crime. It IS a sin, but it is NOT a crime.

It should be....then there would be less crime. :chuckle:

Indications that a sexual relationship might be going on is not evidence at all.

 

[glorydaz]

And how is that different from rape or child molestation?

Physical evidence and victim testimony.

 

[JudgeRightly]

Easier than between two consenting adults.

Which is called fornication, a crime, and if they are caught, the couple who fornicate should be forced to marry and never be allowed to divorce.

 

[glorydaz]

So?

Are you leaving me to guess what you're talking about? Silly boy.

 

[glorydaz]

Which is called fornication, a crime, and if they are caught, the couple who fornicate should be forced to marry and never be allowed to divorce.

Now you're joking, right?

 

[JudgeRightly]

It should be....then there would be less crime. :chuckle:

So... Thought police?

Indications that a sexual relationship might be going on is not evidence at all.

"Evidence is not evidence" :think:

 

[ok doser]

Physical evidence and victim testimony.

Both would be allowed in the case of adultery

 

[ok doser]

Easier than between two consenting adults.

So?

 

[JudgeRightly]

Physical evidence and victim testimony.

Plenty of physical evidence from having sex... And the husband or wife, the children, family, friends, and society, are all victims when someone commits adultery.

Now you're joking, right?

“If a man entices a virgin who is not betrothed, and lies with her, he shall surely pay the bride-price for her to be his wife. - Exodus 22:16 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus22:16&version=NKJV

 

[glorydaz]

So... Thought police?



"Evidence is not evidence" :think:

No, "indications" is not evidence, and I was joking about the pornography.

 

[ok doser]

It is not an easy crime to prove....

Was it easy to prove decades old allegations of child abuse by catholic priests?

 

[glorydaz]

Both would be allowed in the case of adultery

So the husband would be a witness against his wife, and his wife would be required to provide "evidence" that sex had occurred? What if they used "protection". Would the husband have to confiscate that item by force to show the police?

This is playing like an old soap opera I used to watch. opcorn:

 

[glorydaz]

Was it easy to prove decades old allegations of child abuse by catholic priests?

multiple victims over the years

 

[glorydaz]

Plenty of physical evidence from having sex... And the husband or wife, the children, family, friends, and society, are all victims when someone commits adultery.“If a man entices a virgin who is not betrothed, and lies with her, he shall surely pay the bride-price for her to be his wife. - Exodus 22:16 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus22:16&version=NKJV

I wonder why God didn't give the Gentiles these same rules. :think:

 

[ok doser]

I wonder why God didn't give the Gentiles these same rules. :think:

He gave them "Thou Shalt Not Commit Adultery"

 

[ok doser]

multiple victims over the years

Iow, no, it was not easy

Was it worth it?

 

[ok doser]

Ever use a forensic rape kit?

 

[glorydaz]

He gave them "Thou Shalt Not Commit Adultery"

Where is the penalty for doing so listed so the gentiles could see it?