Tolerant homosexuals kicked flight for harassing evil Trump's evil daughter

[Nick M]

If jihadists were to attack my family, I would want this fictional character there to defend them, even with his immorality. aCW does too, but can't admit it and expose himself.

He was created for the purpose of making the Marine Corps look bad, if you don't know the movie.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

So is that a "no"? You won't answer because it shows you are a hypocrite(actor) and a liar.

Hopefully someone cleaned that foul mouth of yours out last night (but then Trumpeteers, like their leader, aren't known for having class).

Instead of posting worthless scenarios and pictures of macho guys from movies, you might want to work on an explanation to God as to why you voted for an unrepentant moral degenerate who 3 days before the general election proudly held the God-hating rainbow flag that represents perversion and death on stage at a rally in Greeley CO.

You can also explain to God why you're not concerned about Trump's selection of Exxon/Mobil CEO Rex Tillerson as Secretary of State who is not only a huge financial contributor to Planned Parenthood (like Donald Trump, Tillerson thinks that PP "does very good things"), but also as head of the once God-fearing Boy Scouts of America allowed homosexual youth (and later homosexual adults, because where there are sexually confused youth, pederasts will follow) into that organization.

We can talk about how Tillerson received the Russian "Order of Friendship Award" from mass murderer/former KGB head Vladimir Putin another time.

 

[SabathMoon]

Are you talking about the same Mike Pence who as Governor of Indiana refused to sign a religious (i.e. Christian) liberty bill because the LGBTQ movement threatened a boycott of his State?

So you believe commerce hospitality discriminate against the morally stupid and confused even if the transaction has nothing to do with a confused lifestyle. You are something else. Are you sure that you are not trying to promote confusion. It is an awesome piece of legislation, and it is better than a stupid marriage amendment to the constitution.

Furthermore, everyone knows Trump has no real power. He is severely compromised due to potential blackmail. The supply seems limitless.

Like every SCOTUS case in the past 50 years that dealt with human sexuality, the majority opinion agreed that Obergefell v Hodges falls under "the right to privacy".

There is something you have forgotten. Homosexual marriage is not a law, but "gay marriage" is. The court does not have the power to make it law and probably has no ability to require its enactment. Courts still have the right to disagree about cohabitation litigation. Same sex marriage has never been legal or legit in the USA. It is the product of your lies and imagination.

The Iowa court ruling declaring it legal is probably a joke, since Iowans don't feel the need to respect Canadian marriages. Canadian marriages need to be reprocessed, and I suspect Iowans will be doing this in the future.

 

[SabathMoon]

Instead of posting worthless scenarios and pictures of macho guys from movies, you might want to work on an explanation to God as to why you voted for an unrepentant moral degenerate who 3 days before the general election proudly held the God-hating rainbow flag that represents perversion and death on stage at a rally in Greeley CO.

Pence or Kaine? Hillary or Kaine as commander and chief of US armed forces? Why do you defend Hillary? Trump and Hillary suck. Get over it!

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Are you talking about the same Mike Pence who as Governor of Indiana refused to sign a religious (i.e. Christian) liberty bill because the LGBTQ movement threatened a boycott of his State?

So you believe commerce hospitality discriminate against the morally stupid and confused even if the transaction has nothing to do with a confused lifestyle.

Throughout the United States Christian business owners (private wedding chapels, florists, caterers, bakers, photographers) have been brought up on various charges, sued, heavily fined and even lost their businesses because they refused to go against Christian doctrine when dealing with homosexual 'weddings' etc.

But then you rainbow warriors pretending to be Christian knew that already didn't you?

You are something else. Are you sure that you are not trying to promote confusion. It is an awesome piece of legislation, and it is better than a stupid marriage amendment to the constitution.

Yes, religious liberty bills are amazing, as they protect people of faith against LGBTQ tyranny. Too bad Indiana Governor Mike Pence didn't grow a backbone and sign the one in his State.

Furthermore, everyone knows Trump has no real power. He is severely compromised due to potential blackmail. The supply seems limitless.

He has the power to nominate Rex Tillerson as Secretary of State, the same Rex Tillerson who sold out the Boy Scouts to NAMBLA and just loves Planned Parenthood. There are a few more sodomites/sodomite lovers in Trump's administration as well (Peter Thiel and Richard Grenell who Trump has picked as his UN toilet stall monitor Ambassador, to name just two).


Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Like every SCOTUS case in the past 50 years that dealt with human sexuality, the majority opinion agreed that Obergefell v Hodges falls under "the right to privacy".

There is something you have forgotten. Homosexual marriage is not a law, but "gay marriage" is.
The court does not have the power to make it law and probably has no ability to require its enactment. Courts still have the right to disagree about cohabitation litigation. Same sex marriage has never been legal or legit in the USA. It is the product of your lies and imagination.

Once your rainbow judicial activist SCOTUS Judges rule on something, it's rare that it's overturned. Hence Roe v Wade. Besides, Donald Trump embraces the rainbow flag, he has no desire to anger the people that helped get him elected (Libertarians) by overturning Obergefell v Hodges.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Pence or Kaine? Hillary or Kaine as commander and chief of US armed forces? Why do you defend Hillary? Trump and Hillary suck. Get over it!

My ballot didn't say that I had to vote for Clinton or Trump, I had other options (and if I didn't I wouldn't have voted).

Thanks for waving your rainbow colors once again SM, it's been awhile since you defended sodomy in my WHMBR! Part 4 thread.

 

[SabathMoon]

Throughout the United States Christian business owners (private wedding chapels, florists, caterers, bakers, photographers) have been brought up on various charges, sued, heavily fined and even lost their businesses because they refused to go against Christian doctrine when dealing with homosexual 'weddings' etc.

You exaggerate, but the amendment to the law doesn't nullify this right. You do not have a right to refuse sale of goods to someone, when they aren't making an issue about "sexual orientation". Life, liberty and property, and not necessarily the pursuit of happiness.

Yes, religious liberty bills are amazing, as they protect people of faith against LGBTQ tyranny. Too bad Indiana Governor Mike Pence didn't grow a backbone and sign the one in his State.

You wanted the lame, non-amended version. Not every commercial transaction needs to have religious element. In case you don't or if you already do know, simple monetary transactions have nothing to do with religion. It is irrelevant if you believe women shouldn't wear men's socks.

He has the power to nominate Rex Tillerson as Secretary of State, the same Rex Tillerson who sold out the Boy Scouts to the NAMBLA and just loves Planned Parenthood. There are a few more sodomites/sodomite lovers in Trump's administration as well (Peter Thiel and Richard Grenell who Trump has picked as his UN toilet stall monitor Ambassador, to name just two).

Rex will be doing the same stuff as Hillary, selling trade and government secrets. Communism is big money. Peter Thiel probably won't make it. He doesn't even know that gay marriage exists. Gay people who are the opposite sex get married all the time.

Like every SCOTUS case in the past 50 years that dealt with human sexuality, the majority opinion agreed that Obergefell v Hodges falls under "the right to privacy".

So you admit it has nothing to with legalization of "same sex marriage". It is interesting how it is declared legal, when they are nay laws providing this institution. There is no such institution.

Once your rainbow judicial activist SCOTUS Judges rule on something, it's rare that it's overturned.

Since there is no such institution as "same sex marriage", it is ridiculous to call or declare it constitutional. The problem is the courts insistence on saying their is such a thing. The solution is simple. States should define automatic and non-automatic marriages. There is no such thing as divorce when someone pays alimony.

And there will be resistance to gay favoritism in corporation when it is learned, the government won't reimburse it. It is a waste of company resources to support a person's homosexual lifestyle beyond their paycheck.

Yes, Trump will transform the term word libertarian into a swear word. But I think you are one also, because I believe you are a lying prude.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Throughout the United States Christian business owners (private wedding chapels, florists, caterers, bakers, photographers) have been brought up on various charges, sued, heavily fined and even lost their businesses because they refused to go against Christian doctrine when dealing with homosexual 'weddings' etc.

You exaggerate,

300 Examples You Have to Read to Understand the Term ‘Homofascism’
http://barbwire.com/2014/07/07/300-examples-read-understand-meant-term-homofascism/

Many more cases of homofascism can be added to the list since the article was written in July of 2014.

but the amendment to the law doesn't nullify this right. You do not have a right to refuse sale of goods to someone, when they aren't making an issue about "sexual orientation". Life, liberty and property, and not necessarily the pursuit of happiness.

The bill was written to protect people of faith (Christians) who refused to cater to events that go against Christian doctrine (weddings, etc.).


Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Yes, religious liberty bills are amazing, as they protect people of faith against LGBTQ tyranny. Too bad Indiana Governor Mike Pence didn't grow a backbone and sign the one in his State.

You wanted the lame, non-amended version. Not every commercial transaction needs to have religious element. In case you don't or if you already do know, simple monetary transactions have nothing to do with religion. It is irrelevant if you believe women shouldn't wear men's socks.

Again (for the mentally slow) : Religious liberty bills protect Christians who refuse to sell out their faith by being forced to cater to immoral events such as homosexual weddings.



Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
He has the power to nominate Rex Tillerson as Secretary of State, the same Rex Tillerson who sold out the Boy Scouts to the NAMBLA and just loves Planned Parenthood. There are a few more sodomites/sodomite lovers in Trump's administration as well (Peter Thiel and Richard Grenell who Trump has picked as his UN toilet stall monitor Ambassador, to name just two).

Rex will be doing the same stuff as Hillary, selling trade and government secrets. Communism is big money. Peter Thiel probably won't make it. He doesn't even know that gay marriage exists. Gay people who are the opposite sex get married all the time.

Obama had Secretary of State John Kerry traveling the world promoting the gay agenda, and threatening punishment against those countries who refuse to embrace it (like Uganda). Rex Tillerson has all of the qualifications to do the same.


Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Like every SCOTUS case in the past 50 years that dealt with human sexuality, the majority opinion agreed that Obergefell v Hodges falls under "the right to privacy".

So you admit it has nothing to with legalization of same sex. It is interesting how it is declared legal, when they are nay laws providing this institution. There is no such institution.

Hence one reason religious liberty bills are needed (so that people of faith won't be forced to cater to immoral events such as homosexual 'weddings').


Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Once your rainbow judicial activist SCOTUS Judges rule on something, it's rare that it's overturned.

Since there is no such institution as same sex marriage, it is ridiculous to call or declare it constitutional. The problem is the courts insistence on saying their is such a thing. The solution is simple. States should define automatic and non-automatic marriages. There is no such thing as divorce when someone pays alimony.

Take it up with the guy you voted for, he's the one embracing the LGBTQ flag, not me.

And there will be resistance to gay favoritism in corporation when it is learned, the government won't reimburse it. It is a waste of company resources to support a person's homosexual lifestyle beyond their paycheck.

Which corporations are you talking about?

CORPORATE EQUALITY INDEX 2O17
Rating Workplaces on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Equality
http://hrc-assets.s3-website-us-eas...les/assets/resources/CEI-2017-FinalReport.pdf

 

[MrDante]

Throughout the United States Christian business owners (private wedding chapels, florists, caterers, bakers, photographers) have been brought up on various charges, sued, heavily fined and even lost their businesses because they refused to go against Christian doctrine when dealing with homosexual 'weddings' etc.

name the businesses gays forced to close

 

[SabathMoon]

300 Examples You Have to Read to Understand the Term ‘Homofascism’
http://barbwire.com/2014/07/07/300-examples-read-understand-meant-term-homofascism/

Now this might be worth looking at.

The bill was written to protect people of faith (Christians) who refused to cater to events that go against Christian doctrine (weddings, etc.).

It is still is written so. You need to prove Pence is stabbing your religious right community in the back. I do admit he did believe in a worthless parental consent law. Imagine someone from a rich family has daughter who has embarrassed them; they go ahead and tell her to get the abortion. Wow, what a great idea.

Yes, religious liberty bills are amazing, as they protect people of faith against LGBTQ tyranny. Too bad Indiana Governor Mike Pence didn't grow a backbone and sign the one in his State.

But it wasn't your idea, was it?

Again (for the mentally slow) : Religious liberty bills protect Christians who refuse to sell out their faith by being forced to cater to immoral events such as homosexual weddings.

But it wasn't your idea, was it?

He has the power to nominate Rex Tillerson as Secretary of State, the same Rex Tillerson who sold out the Boy Scouts to the NAMBLA and just loves Planned Parenthood. There are a few more sodomites/sodomite lovers in Trump's administration as well (Peter Thiel and Richard Grenell who Trump has picked as his UN toilet stall monitor Ambassador, to name just two).

Until Rex is on the Supreme Court, I really don't care. Perhaps we should cut the Department of State. It doesn't strike me as important.

Obama had Secretary of State John Kerry traveling the world promoting the gay agenda, and threatening punishment against those countries who refuse to embrace it (like Uganda). Rex Tillerson has all of the qualifications to do the same.

Prove his qualifications. I only see the innuendos of a fanatic.

Like every SCOTUS case in the past 50 years that dealt with human sexuality, the majority opinion agreed that Obergefell v Hodges falls under "the right to privacy".

Same sex marriages are still illegitimate marriages. Gay adoptions are illegitimate in most states. I really don't see your point. You can't evade that I am correct, and you are just simply wrong.

Hence one reason religious liberty bills are needed (so that people of faith won't be forced to cater to immoral events such as homosexual 'weddings').

The SCOTUS cannot prevent such legislation. Do they even have the executive power to establish same sex marriage as an institution? The court can deny legislation; it cannot make legislation.

Once your rainbow judicial activist SCOTUS Judges rule on something, it's rare that it's overturned.

The court can deny legislation; it cannot make legislation. Their denial of legislative precedents is so illogical and unpopular-- it will be overturned.

Which corporations are you talking about?

CORPORATE EQUALITY INDEX 2O17
Rating Workplaces on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Equality
http://hrc-assets.s3-website-us-eas...les/assets/resources/CEI-2017-FinalReport.pdf

While I will find this interesting, the workplaces want government subsidies for this. It won't happen. Expensive gay employees are not assets. :bowser: :greedy:

 

[aCultureWarrior]

name the businesses gays forced to close

You mean name businesses that those ever so tolerant sodomites forced to close because people wouldn't sell out their Christian faith?

Here's a recent one:

Oregon Bakery Forced to Close Shop after Refusing To Serve Gay Wedding
http://www.cnsnews.com/mrctv-blog/j...d-close-shop-after-refusing-serve-gay-wedding

 

[SabathMoon]

I am impressed. Dr Pepper Snapple gets low scores. I will continue to drink Dr Pepper products. Pepsi and Joca-Cola get perfect scores. :mmph:

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
300 Examples You Have to Read to Understand the Term ‘Homofascism’
http://barbwire.com/2014/07/07/300-e...m-homofascism/

Now this might be worth looking at.

It's just the cutest thing when you homosexual activists act so innocent and naïve (unless you've been living under a rock, you're well aware of what the 'gaystapo' has been up to).

Since I try not to waste too much time on rainbowers passing themselves off as Christian, I'll jump to the last statement.


Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Which corporations are you talking about?

CORPORATE EQUALITY INDEX 2O17
Rating Workplaces on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Equality
http://hrc-assets.s3-website-us-east...inalReport.pdf

While I will find this interesting, the workplaces want government subsidies for this. It won't happen. Expensive gay employees are not assets.

I'm not sure where you came up with that. HRC (founded by child rapist Terry Bean) puts out a index each year showing what corporations are friendly to the LGBTQ/NAMBLA cause. If a certain corporation isn't bowing to the LGBTQ cause, the LGBTQ movement puts the thumbscrews on and threatens a boycott (death threats of high ranking officials in the corporation, etc.) of said corporation.

 

[SabathMoon]

It's just the cutest thing when you homosexual activists act so innocent and naïve (unless you've been living under a rock, you're well aware of what the 'gaystapo' has been up to).
... more arrogant prudish slanders ......

You used to be gay, and are married to a once gay woman; and you have the gall to call me a "Rainbower". You have the arrogance of Michele Bachman. And you gave a link which had nothing do to with militant homosexuals destroying businesses and capitalism.

You also ignored my comment that no one cares if a woman buys male socks. You ignored how I proved parental consent laws worthless. You have failed to impugn Mike Pence as Religious Right traitor. You ignored me, when I said same sex marriage is an institution of federal. You think Roe versus Wade was judicial legislation; it wasn't.

As a Religious Right nutcase, you are a theo-fascist supporting socialism whenever it supports religion.

Are you anything other than a worthless hypocrite?

Which corporations are you talking about?

CORPORATE EQUALITY INDEX 2O17
Rating Workplaces on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Equality
http://hrc-assets.s3-website-us-east...inalReport.pdf

I'm not sure where you came up with that. HRC (founded by child rapist Terry Bean) puts out a index each year showing what corporations are friendly to the LGBTQ/NAMBLA cause. If a certain corporation isn't bowing to the LGBTQ cause, the LGBTQ movement puts the thumbscrews on and threatens a boycott (death threats of high ranking officials in the corporation, etc.) of said corporation.

As if the corporations do not want subsidies, and are not using the Homo-patrol to get it. They are only friendly to upper class homosexuals. They and (thyself) can keep dreaming.

 

[WizardofOz]

You used to be gay, and are married to a once gay woman

Wait, what that's now?

 

[Crucible]

Throughout the United States Christian business owners (private wedding chapels, florists, caterers, bakers, photographers) have been brought up on various charges, sued, heavily fined and even lost their businesses because they refused to go against Christian doctrine when dealing with homosexual 'weddings' etc.

But then you rainbow warriors pretending to be Christian knew that already didn't you?

The homosexuals who did all those things are ultimately empowered by heterosexual supporters. In reality, every single 'liberal Christian' on here supports Christians losing their businesses for affirming biblical principles.

Which is bad.

The early Christians were told not to participate in the paganism in Rome, and they were martyred for it.

In short
~We are back to pagan Rome~

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Throughout the United States Christian business owners (private wedding chapels, florists, caterers, bakers, photographers) have been brought up on various charges, sued, heavily fined and even lost their businesses because they refused to go against Christian doctrine when dealing with homosexual 'weddings' etc.

The homosexuals who did all those things are ultimately empowered by heterosexual supporters...

Correct; such a small percentage of the population couldn't have permeated and destroyed the invaluable institutions that they have without support from those who don't engage in same sex sodomy.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

You used to be gay, and are married to a once gay woman; and you have the gall to call me a "Rainbower". You have the arrogance of Michele Bachman. And you gave a link which had nothing do to with militant homosexuals destroying businesses and capitalism.

You also ignored my comment that no one cares if a woman buys male socks. You ignored how I proved parental consent laws worthless. You have failed to impugn Mike Pence as Religious Right traitor. You ignored me, when I said same sex marriage is an institution of federal. You think Roe versus Wade was judicial legislation; it wasn't.

As a Religious Right nutcase, you are a theo-fascist supporting socialism whenever it supports religion.

Are you anything other than a worthless hypocrite?

My my, when you rainbower's have a mental meltdown, you don't hold anything back.

Seek psychological help, you're desperately in need of it.

 

[SabathMoon]

DELETED MISPOST

 

[SabathMoon]

My my, when you rainbower's have a mental meltdown, you don't hold anything back.

I made a misstatement. So I was holding back a little. Same Sex Marriage is not a right nor an institution in all 50 states. You lie and say otherwise. However I do-believe just like you that masturbation through homosexuality is the wrong way to go.

Yet I am not sure how you choose to masturbate in your too happy gay marriage.

Seek psychological help, you're desperately in need of it.

You are the one who needs the intervention not me.

Ban Coca-Cola, drink more Dr. Pepper.