toldailytopic: Same-sex marriage: for it, or against it?

[Arthur Brain]

would you consider that irresponsible to have children without getting married?

Not necessarily no.

 

[chrysostom]

Not necessarily no.

congratulations on answering a question

you got it wrong
but
you actually answered it

 

[Rusha]

would you consider that irresponsible to have children without getting married?

Not necessarily no.

congratulations on answering a question

you got it wrong got it wrong but you actually answered it

So you believe it is wrong for unmarried women to make the choice of giving life to their unborn babies? Nice job pretending to speak in the best interest of the babies, Mr. Pro-abort Chrys ... :loser:

 

[chrysostom]

So you believe it is wrong for unmarried women to make the choice of giving life to their unborn babies while pretending to speak in the best interest of the babies, Mr. Pro-abort Chrys ...

I thought you were going to ignore me

you know that I cannot ignore you

 

[Arthur Brain]

congratulations on answering a question

you got it wrong
but
you actually answered it

I, along with everyone else, have been answering your questions throughout this thread. You, OTOH, have constantly avoided them which I doubt has fooled anyone at all....

If my answer is wrong then point out why, else as usual you ain't saying much...

lain:

 

[Rusha]

I thought you were going to ignore me

you know that I cannot ignore you

Consider yourself a fly with very annoying wings. BTW, you actually CAN ignore me. All you have to do is not respond to my posts.

As for me, I am responding to you because I feel you are a disgrace to the prolife movement.

 

[chrysostom]

I wonder why she hates me so much

I am just trying to protect the babies

 

[Rusha]

I wonder why she hates me so much

I am just trying to protect the babies

Who are you speaking of? There are quite a few of us here that see you as trolling up this thread.

 

[chrysostom]

toldailytopic: Same-sex marriage: for it, or against it?

I am against it because I think the purpose of marriage is to protect the child

 

[Rusha]

What child?

 

[chrysostom]

every child

 

[Rusha]

Is every man, woman and teen capable of producing children?

 

[chrysostom]

Is every man, woman and teen capable of producing children?

it takes a man and a women

 

[Rusha]

it takes a man and a women

Once again ... Is every man, woman and teen capable of producing children?

IF you want to argue that individuals need to be able to produce children via the old fashion method, then certainly you need to be consistent and explain how you would be able to monitor which couples should or shouldn't be allowed to marry.

 

[chrysostom]

Once again ... Is every man, woman and teen capable of producing children?

IF you want to argue that individuals need to be able to produce children via the old fashion method, then certainly you need to be consistent and explain how you would be able to monitor which couples should or shouldn't be allowed to marry.

we already know that anything besides a man and a women will not produce a child

 

[Rusha]

we already know that anything besides a man and a women will not produce a child

Why won't you answer the question? Here it is again:

Once again ... Is every man, woman and teen capable of producing children?

 

[chrysostom]

Is every man, woman and teen capable of producing children?

no

 

[Rusha]

no

Then why would you use such a stupid argument?

 

[Granite]

Who are you speaking of? There are quite a few of us here that see you as trolling up this thread.

Uh, yeah.:bang:

Question: is opposition to gay marriage driven in some part by jealousy?

 

[chrysostom]

Then why would you use such a stupid argument?

what stupid argument?