Just fyi, Moses was also a high priest, and no one is going to get away with saying he was Jesus - a type of Jesus in many ways, but not Jesus.
Only the high priest went behind the veil on Yom Kippur and there was only one high priest.
This can be disproved.The Truth About Melchizedek
Now, let us check Psalm 110:4, which in the KJV says, "The Lord has sworn and will not repent, you are a priest forever after the order of Melchizedek." This is a Christian gloss plagiarized by Paul and grossly forged by the Church in the 4th Century under the excuse of pious forgery.
Here is what Psalm 110:4 says in the originals in Hebrew: "The Lord has sworn and will not relent, you are a priest forever; a rightful king by My decree." As you can see, it has nothing to do with king Melchizedek, king of Salem, but rather to David in the type level of interpretation, which points to the archetype level of Israel, the seed of Abraham as a nation of priests and kings. (Exod. 19:6; Isa. 61:6) Obviously, only the High Priest of the Most High would produce a generation of priests and kings through Israel.
This is a collection of “pesher” commentaries on verses from the Hebrew Bible. It focuses on Melchizedek, an enigmatic figure who is mentioned only twice in the Hebrew Bible: in Genesis 14:18–20 and in Psalm 110:4. Whereas the Bible describes him as a priest and a king, this text portrays him as a heavenly savior figure who will rescue the righteous at the final judgment.
Psalm 99 states that Moshe is indeed a Kohen: if therefore he also is a Priest then who is of the higher order between Moshe or Ahron?
My understanding is that King David accorded himself priestly privileges. He is recorded as eating the shewbread, entering the Holy place, and interceding on behalf of the nation at various points.The whole motif about Melchizedek originated in the proverb "After the Order of Melchizedek." If you read Psalm 110:4, the Lord has sworn and will not repent; you are a priest forever "After the order of Melchizedek." David was not from the Tribe of Levi wherefrom priests were made after the Order of Aaron. Since the Lord had sworn to make of David a priest forever, a proverb had been formed because he could not be after the order of Aaron. Hence, after the order of Melchizedek but only to distinguish his priesthood from the Order of Aaron. Hence, after the order of Melchizedek. Absolutely nothing to do with the pagan priest of the Canaanites who just happened to be called Melchizedek.
Why King David would be a priest forever after the order of Melchizedek if he died? Because he was only the type pointing to the archetype in his People of Judah that would be to the Lord a kingdom of priests and a Holy nation. (Exod. 19:6) So, what the Lord really sworn was that in David, his Tribe of Judah would be a priest forever after the order of Melchizedek. David died alright but Judah has remained as a People before the Lord forever. (Jer. 31:36)
Bottom line is that, "After the Order of Melchizedek" was only a proverb to distinguish from after the order of Aaron which
was what the Tribe of David could not be.
Moses was a priest of the order of Aaron his brother.Therefore, if perfection were through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law) what further need was there that another priest should rise according to the order of Melchizedek and not be called according to the order of Aaron?
(Hebrews 7:11 NKJV)
Ahron is nowhere called High Priest, (neither Kohen Gadol nor more properly haKohen haGadol). However Ahron the Priest did go behind the veil and the writer of Hebrews admonishes his readers likewise to do the same in the new supernal way through Messiah, now that he has opened up the way before us, (Hebrews 10:19-22) for Messiah has after all made us a kingdom of priests unto his God and our God.
Moshe is not the first after the order of Melke-Tzedek though. He received it from Jethro. Do you agree?Not so and this is why Yhoshua is placed BEFORE Eleazar and the people:
Numbers 27:18-23 KJV
18. And the Lord said unto Moses, Take thee Joshua the son of Nun, a man in whom is the spirit, and lay thine hand upon him;
19. And set him before Eleazar the priest, and before all the congregation; and give him a charge in their sight.
20. And thou shalt put some of thine honour upon him, that all the congregation of the children of Israel may be obedient.
21. And he shall stand before Eleazar the priest, who shall ask counsel for him after the judgment of Urim before the Lord: at his word shall they go out, and at his word they shall come in, both he, and all the children of Israel with him, even all the congregation.
22. And Moses did as the Lord commanded him: and he took Joshua, and set him before Eleazar the priest, and before all the congregation:
23. And he laid his hands upon him, and gave him a charge, as the Lord commanded by the hand of Moses.
Also YHWH gave Yhoshua the charge:
Deuteronomy 31:14-15 KJV
14. And the Lord said unto Moses, Behold, thy days approach that thou must die: call Joshua, and present yourselves in the tabernacle of the congregation, that I may give him a charge. And Moses And Joshua went, and presented themselves in the tabernacle of the congregation.
15. And the Lord appeared in the tabernacle in a pillar of a cloud: and the pillar of the cloud stood over the door of the tabernacle.
And Yhoshua the son of Perpetuity was full of the Spirit of Wisdom:
Deuteronomy 34:8-9 KJV
8. And the children of Israel wept for Moses in the plains of Moab thirty days: so the days of weeping and mourning for Moses were ended.
9. And Joshua the son of Nun was full of the spirit of wisdom; for Moses had laid his hands upon him: and the children of Israel hearkened unto him, and did as the Lord commanded Moses.
And therefore it is Yhoshua bin Nun whom YHWH commands concerning the setting up of the sanctuary cities and the release at the death of the High Priest, for the next Kohen Gadol after Moshe was Yhoshua whom Moshe had laid his hands upon and given the charge, setting him BEFORE Eleazar and the congregation:
Joshua 20:1-2, 6 KJV
1. The Lord also spake unto Joshua, saying,
2. Speak to the children of Israel, saying, Appoint out for you cities of refuge, whereof I spake unto you by the hand of Moses:
6. And he shall dwell in that city, until he stand before the congregation for judgment, and until the death of the high priest that shall be in those days: then shall the slayer return, and come unto his own city, and unto his own house, unto the city from whence he fled.
And therefore this Yhoshua is NOT Jeshua though he also was a Kohen Gadol:
Zechariah 3:1-2 KJV
1. And he shewed me Joshua the high priest standing before the angel of the Lord, and Satan standing at his right hand to resist him.
2. And the Lord said unto Satan, The Lord rebuke thee, O Satan; even the Lord that hath chosen Jerusalem rebuke thee: is not this a brand plucked out of the fire?
The above vision concerns the event recorded in Joshua 5:13-15
Joshua 5:15-13 KJV
13. And it came to pass, when Joshua was by Jericho, that he lifted up his eyes and looked, and, behold, there stood a man over against him with his sword drawn in his hand: and Joshua went unto him, and said unto him, Art thou for us, or for our adversaries?
14. And he said, Nay; but as captain of the host of the Lord [Sar tsaba YHWH, Daniel 8:11] am I now come. And Joshua fell on his face to the earth, and did worship, and said unto him, What saith my lord unto his servant?
15. And the captain of the Lord's host said unto Joshua, Loose thy shoe from off thy foot; for the place whereon thou standest is holy. And Joshua did so.
Miykael rebukes the Satan concerning "the Body of Moshe", according to the Jude passage quoted below, which is not the physical body of Moshe but the TaNaK Body of all the faithful until the advent of Messiah and the transition into "the Body of Messiah" in the Brit Chadashah writings:
Jude 1:9 KJV
9. Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee.
The quote from Jude 1:9 is from Zkaryah 3:2 above and concerns not the physical body of Moshe, as most assume, but rather concerns all of the "body of Moshe" throughout all of the Tanach time period until the advent of Messiah, which Tanach body was known as the body of Moshe, (and not the "body of Ahron" because Moshe is of the greater order of Priesthood and therefore Yhoshua also is the second Kohen Gadol even though he was of Ephraim). It is a hidden priesthood. Moshe is the first Kohen Gadol after the order of Melki-Tzedek to hold office under the giving of the Torah, he is the greater even though he is the younger of he and Ahron because he is Priest after the order of Melki-Tzedek. This is likewise revealed in the fact that Moshe married into the line through Yithrow Raguel by his daughter Tsipporah, (one of "seven little birdies" [of the clean kind] ).
Body of Moshe ~ TaNaK Body of the Saints
Body of Messiah ~ Brit Chadashah Body of the Saints
Moshe is not the first after the order of Melke-Tzedek though. He received it from Jethro. Do you agree?
This can be disproved.
The site linked below contains images from the Dead Sea scrolls, manuscript 11Q13. The pictured manuscript is a Pesher on Psalms 110:4. This is provided online in partnership with the Israeli Antiquities Authority. According to the site:
The Dead Sea scrolls are dated from the 3rd century BCE to the 1st century CE, and are thought to be written by Essene Jews. This is published by a Jewish source; not a Christian one.
Do you see the problem?
"Melichizedek" in Psalms 110 cannot possibly be a 4th century Christian gloss, if 1st century Jews were already discussing Melichizedek in relation to this verse.
http://www.deadseascrolls.org.il/explore-the-archive/manuscript/11Q13-1?locale=en_US
Jarrod
Yes, by way of marriage to Tsipporah, (a clean bird) one of the seven daughters of Yithrow Raguel, ("His Excellency" Raguel). Yithrow or Jethro is probably is not a name but rather a title, "His Excellency", Raguel. Moshe is the first to hold the office under the giving of Torah, (and the Torah was given through the instrumentality of the holy Angels). Yithrow Raguel was a Priest before the Torah was given at Mount Sinai.
What you said here is an illogical defense for slandering the Apostle Paul.
Moses was a priest of the order of Aaron his brother.
Therefore, if perfection were through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law) what further need was there that another priest should rise according to the order of Melchizedek and not be called according to the order of Aaron?
(Hebrews 7:11 NKJV)
1 - You appear to be lumping me with the rest of mainstream Christianity.
2 - Where did I say bodily resurrection as you appear to mean it in the sense of a physical body?
3 - Surely you have read how Moshe and Eliyahu appeared in glory with Yeshua in the holy mount? That was before the resurrection of Yeshua. And how is it that Moshe was then in the land if he appeared in glory with Yeshua in the holy mount before the resurrection of Yeshua? And again, surely you have read also where Yeshua says to the Tsaddukim, "In the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of Elohim in heaven. But as touching the resurrection of the dead, have you not read that which was spoken to you of Elohim, saying, "I am Elohey Abraham, and Elohey Yitschak, and Elohey Yakob"? He is not Elohim of the dead but of the living." (And the multitude were astonished at his doctrine; and for very good reason if one understands what he said).
1 - You appear to be lumping me with the rest of mainstream Christianity. Where did I say bodily resurrection as you appear to mean it in the sense of a physical body?
2 - Surely you have read how Moshe and Eliyahu appeared in glory with Yeshua in the holy mount? That was before the resurrection of Yeshua. And how is it that Moshe was then in the land if he appeared in glory with Yeshua in the holy mount before the resurrection of Yeshua? And again, surely you have read also where Yeshua says to the Tsaddukim, "In the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of Elohim in heaven. But as touching the resurrection of the dead, have you not read that which was spoken to you of Elohim, saying, "I am Elohey Abraham, and Elohey Yitschak, and Elohey Yakob"? He is not Elohim of the dead but of the living." (And the multitude were astonished at his doctrine; and for very good reason if one understands what he said).
1 - You appear to be lumping me with the rest of mainstream Christianity. Where did I say bodily resurrection as you appear to mean it in the sense of a physical body?
2 - Surely you have read how Moshe and Eliyahu appeared in glory with Yeshua in the holy mount? That was before the resurrection of Yeshua. And how is it that Moshe was then in the land if he appeared in glory with Yeshua in the holy mount before the resurrection of Yeshua?
3 - And again, surely you have read also where Yeshua says to the Tsaddukim, "In the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of Elohim in heaven.
4 - But as touching the resurrection of the dead, have you not read that which was spoken to you of Elohim, saying, "I am Elohey Abraham, and Elohey Yitschak, and Elohey Yakob"? He is not Elohim of the dead but of the living." (And the multitude were astonished at his doctrine; and for very good reason if one understands what he said).
Abraham tithed of his stuff to Melchizedek because Melchizedek was the greater of the two for it was Melchizedek that was the priest of the most high God.
No, Abraham did not tithe Melchizedek, the Baal priest of the Canaanites. The origin of the Jewish tithe comes from Gen. 28:22 when Jacob had a dream in Bethel and promised the tithe of every thing to return to the Lord. To say that Abraham paid the tithe to a pagan priest of the Canaanites would be a dishonor to Abraham; let alone an act of idolatry. Abraham simply gave Melchizedek a random part of ten of the loot to pay for his hospitality. That's all.
Genesis 14:18 And Melchizedek king of Salem brought forth bread and wine:and he was the priest of the most high God.
Perhaps he was afraid that Abraham, returning from a war with 5 kings could take Jerusalem too, just as David did later.
Therefore Mel blessed Abram as a action of Mel's priestly duties to a believer.
Abraham a Canaanite believer of a pagan priest! Please, that's an act of idolatry.
Genesis 14:19 And he blessed him, and said, Blessed be Abram of the most high God possessor of heaven and earth.
See what I mean? Abraham was the one Priest of the Most High God who produced a Kingdom of priests and a Holy Nation from among his descendants in Israel. (Exod. 19:6)
That may help clarify the issue of who was who.
To Christians maybe who can look at this as open season to interpolate Jesus into the text.
he was the priest of God Most High,
Yes, he, Abraham who produced a nation of priest and kings. (Exod. 19:6)
And he blessed him and said, Blessed (favored with blessings, made blissful,) be Abram by God Most High.
The text almost says literally, Abraham, the Priest of the Most High. The Priest that brought about a kingdom of priests and a Holy Nation.(Exod. 19:6)
1 - My understanding is that King David accorded himself priestly privileges. He is recorded as eating the shewbread, entering the Holy place, and interceding on behalf of the nation at various points.
2 - This is common-sensical... a king is a representative of his city or tribe, so he ought to be able to negotiate or intercede on their behalf.
3 - The "order of Melchizedek" then is an order of priesthood outside the order of Aaron (as you also said) which is recognized as legitimate.
4 - The sole requirement to be part of the order of Melchizedek is that one is the king of Jerusalem.
5 - The New Testament (Hebrews) uses this as an argument for Jesus' legitimacy as a priest.
Jarrod