Again, you were directly attacking me in the first response; and now you lie and deny it right in front of the world.
:nono: I didn't deny calling your academic prowess into question. That isn't an ad hominem, it is pertinent to all cults in discussion. It isn't 'just' C- grades. It is also hard-heartedness. Is that an 'ad hominem?' :nono: It is pertinent to the conversation taking place.
I suppose from the Calvinite perspective it is God's will that you do the evil that you do, huh? However you might want to recheck what elect means because your fruit reveals that you have no clue.
See that's an ad hominem because it has nothing (nada ziltch) to do with this thread. Such is the definition of what an ad hominem actually entails. An ad hominem, by definition, is an attack having nothing to do with the conversation in order to discredit the other and nothing more. Calling a flaw on the carpet that directly affects the conversation at hand, is, in fact, not an ad hominem.
Even your logic is utterly flawed: you have been on the attack spewing ad hominem ever since the very first time we ever spoke, which was about a year ago now, and it was not in the ECT board when we first spoke because I do not post there. I therefore know from experience that your comments to Zeke, (though I do not presume to speak for Zeke), are simply more lies and ad hominem.
Sure you do. Don't kid yourself. This is EXACTLY what you are doing. And no, I'm not spewing ad hominem. We ARE discussing flaws that enable hundreds of cults to somehow think 'we are the only ones.' :dizzy: Which of those small insignificant hundreds would I choose? :dizzy: No, God provided a manual. It is against every small odd and incredibly arrogant insignificant cult that exists.
This is the THEOLOGY board where all kinds of different theologies are open to discussion. You already have the ECT board where the discussion is reserved for "Exclusively Christian Theology" which supposedly includes Calvinites such as yourself. It is YOU who are here attacking people on a constant basis and denying that fact by claiming that other theological discussions do not belong here in *your* board which you imagine yourself to be "protecting". You attack and then cry out that you are being attacked when someone else returns your filth right back into your face. Stop slinging mud and perhaps you will stop getting your own mud thrown back into your face. Treat others as you would be treated.
No, not really. We really don't have a Mormon section or a Unitarian section. It is open for discussion, but not doctrine. It then makes a kind of sense that we'd be attacked. You can try and whitewash that but it amounts to hate-mail and attack. I'm simply of the opinion that not many cultists think all that much. Your quick gloss-overs in response are par for me. As far as 'mudslinging' right back? No. This thread is about the triune view. You'll see a LOT of abuse toward that end. Look at your own hatred of Calvinism, for instance. It has nothing to do with this thread. Do 'cults' have anything to do with this thread? :doh: