Tell him clefty !!!
You are welcome. Should I edit the OP after the fact or leave it the way it is?[MENTION=5582]Jacob[/MENTION]. Thank you for making your posts much more readable.
Tell him clefty !!!
He may have been speaking against Judaizers. For he had Timothy circumcised.
He may have been speaking against Judaizers. For he had Timothy circumcised.
lol...Just trying to make clear that the Sabbath is not just for one tribe of people...but was made for all of us
I have yet to hear that "thou shalt not kill" was for one tribe only...and since He kept that commandment we don't have to...
I also don't appreciate people making more of circumcision than it is...merely a symbol
It happens to infants who don't know any better...
just like I don't support infant baptism...neither infant understands what is occurring...
Not for God's sake, he didn't!
You're rationalizing. I told you that you'd have to cherry pick and that's exactly what you're doing. That's what all - ALL - Messianic Jews do.
And what are you if not a Judaizer? Are you not advocating that Christians follow the Law of Moses - a.k.a. the Torah?
Paul had Timothy circumcised so he could assist Paul in ministering to Jews. The uncircumcised had no credibility with the circumcised. They weren't even allowed into the Temple and signs were posted warning them.
I have no problem with your beliefs, as long as you realize most Christians well understand they are saved by Grace alone.There is nothing wrong when a Christian follows the Law of Moses. A Jew is obligated to do so, as this is the covenant God made with the nation of Israel.
I know about Messianic Judaism, and though you may be wrong about the Law or Messianic Judaism or Messianic Jews, I must say that Judaism or my identity as a Jew comes before that I attend a Messianic Jewish congregation. Meaning, in a sense I am a part of Messianic Judaism, even as I don't agree necessarily with Messianic doctrine. However, this statement or admission of mine might not even be in the area you are objecting to. You are making a point, but I see no reason to cherry pick anything. I accept all of God's Law. I observe Torah, though I live outside of the land of Israel.
Apart from grace no one is saved. It is the only way. Salvation is not by or of works. See Ephesians 2:8-9 NASB.I have no problem with your beliefs, as long as you realize most Christians well understand they are saved by Grace alone.
The new covenant is for the house of Israel and the house of Judah. Gentiles for one do not need to be circumcised.
That is a great question. I do know that the people, Israel, of which I am now a part, broke the first covenant. This is the covenant God made with Israel at Mount Sinai, which involves or includes the Law. The Law is the covenant or the Law is a part of the covenant, the Law being God's Law, commands, instruction, associated with the covenant. Some say the new covenant is God's law written on hearts and minds, and it is, but it might be said that the reason for the new covenant is that they broke it so God had to write it on hearts and minds.Why is the new covenant for Israel and Judah necessary?
What is done is done, but in the future if you are going to give out a lot of information, it is better to split it up over several posts in the thread. Don't make your argument all in one post.You are welcome. Should I edit the OP after the fact or leave it the way it is?
You may be speaking of posts even in this thread after the OP, or encouraging me in thinking about these things with a mind or outlook for the future. I think it is a good idea so long as everyone can see the verses. Maybe the verses appearing when a person hovers their mouse pointer over a verse reference, so long as I can easily do this and it does not prevent a person from seeing clearly all the verses that pertain or relate to the subject.
Okay. Thank you. There was a time where, well... no, I can't say for sure. Making one's point in the OP was encouraged. Maybe making the OP complete. Or, making a point, statement, or asking a question in one post. Maybe then defending it or substantiating it, backing it up, answering objections. If evidence is needed, is this in the OP? I think that if I ever need more than one post I can state something to the effect that there will be subsequent posts.What is done is done, but in the future if you are going to give out a lot of information, it is better to split it up over several posts in the thread. Don't make your argument all in one post.
That is a great question.
God rescued Jacob's people from Egypt to be a kingdom of priests. The people weren't keen on the idea so God instituted the Levitical priesthood in their place. However, perfection was not available through the Levitical priesthood so God promised he would make a new covenant with the people.
God's new covenant will be implemented at Christ's coming.
Since Jesus' death a new priesthood has been established. We're it.
Why did God wait for thousands of year to put that in His Word?Apart from grace no one is saved. It is the only way. Salvation is not by or of works. See Ephesians 2:8-9 NASB.
:dizzy:God rescued Jacob's people from Egypt to be a kingdom of priests. The people weren't keen on the idea so God instituted the Levitical priesthood in their place. However, perfection was not available through the Levitical priesthood so God promised he would make a new covenant with the people.
God's new covenant will be implemented at Christ's coming.
Since Jesus' death a new priesthood has been established. We're it.
No.God rescued Jacob's people from Egypt to be a kingdom of priests. The people weren't keen on the idea so God instituted the Levitical priesthood in their place. However, perfection was not available through the Levitical priesthood so God promised he would make a new covenant with the people.
This already happened, 2000 years ago.God's new covenant will be implemented at Christ's coming.
No. You misunderstand or misread the scriptures.Since Jesus' death a new priesthood has been established. We're it.