Like clockwork, the liberals respond to the truthfulness of my last post. You're playing the same "racist!" card here as you/your allies did in my thread entitled "The Politically Incorrect Truth About Martin Luther King Jr.", so this was expected.
When I read the account of the Wounded-Knee "massacre" from various publications, things just didn't add up. Many articles said that the Indians were unarmed, and later in those same articles stated that 25 soldiers were killed in the battle.
How are unarmed Indians able to kill 25 soldiers and as shown in my post, injure 35 more?.
I then did some research about the "Ghost Dance" and saw that basically it is a war dance to inspire American Indians to take back what they believed was once there's, and how intimidating it would be for settlers and Army personnel to view it.
That being said: I first looked for the other side of the story about Wounded Knee in all of the reliable sources that liberals use (CNN, Washington Post, Planned Parenthood, HRC.org, Socialist Workers Party, etc. etc.) and can you believe it, not one strayed from the lie that it was a massacre by Army soldiers!
If you want to attempt to refute that John Greenway, Professor of Anthropology at the University of Colorado and a specialist in the history of American Indians found thirteen errors on the first page of the introduction to Dee Brown’s bestseller Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee, please attempt to do so.
If you want to attempt to refute the official report that Colonel Harry L. Hawthorne, who was awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor for his bravery at the Wounded Knee shootout wrote, then please attempt to do so.
If you want to attempt to refute what Brigadier General S.L.A. Marshall, one of America’s foremost military historians and himself part Indian, said about the lies put forth smearing what really happened at Wounded-Knee, then please attempt to do so.
I look forward to your reply.
When I read the account of the Wounded-Knee "massacre" from various publications, things just didn't add up. Many articles said that the Indians were unarmed, and later in those same articles stated that 25 soldiers were killed in the battle.
How are unarmed Indians able to kill 25 soldiers and as shown in my post, injure 35 more?.
I then did some research about the "Ghost Dance" and saw that basically it is a war dance to inspire American Indians to take back what they believed was once there's, and how intimidating it would be for settlers and Army personnel to view it.
That being said: I first looked for the other side of the story about Wounded Knee in all of the reliable sources that liberals use (CNN, Washington Post, Planned Parenthood, HRC.org, Socialist Workers Party, etc. etc.) and can you believe it, not one strayed from the lie that it was a massacre by Army soldiers!
If you want to attempt to refute that John Greenway, Professor of Anthropology at the University of Colorado and a specialist in the history of American Indians found thirteen errors on the first page of the introduction to Dee Brown’s bestseller Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee, please attempt to do so.
If you want to attempt to refute the official report that Colonel Harry L. Hawthorne, who was awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor for his bravery at the Wounded Knee shootout wrote, then please attempt to do so.
If you want to attempt to refute what Brigadier General S.L.A. Marshall, one of America’s foremost military historians and himself part Indian, said about the lies put forth smearing what really happened at Wounded-Knee, then please attempt to do so.
I look forward to your reply.
Last edited:
