The New Rep System Is A Joke

Status
Not open for further replies.

Town Heretic

Out of Order
Hall of Fame
Yours is super high too.
No, not compared to soots. And consider, before the reset I was literally stuck on the rep ceiling. Now, by way of, most soots members who remain active are triple my score or better. And then a few of us formed a social group to much more slowly but surely respond to the effort, if only to keep a handful of non soots within line of sight.

I'd just as soon hide the number and go back to reping exclusively as a message system and encouragement.
 
Last edited:

meshak

BANNED
Banned
No, not compared to soots. And consider, before the reset I was literally stuck on the rep ceiling. Now, by way of, most soots members who remain active are triple my score or better. And then a few of us formed a social group to much more slowly but surely respond to the effort, if only to keep a handful of non soots withing line of sight.

I'd just as soon hide the number and go back to reping exclusively as a message system and encouragement.

Yes, I have noticed some members marks did not lower much.

Chris had high marks too but now his is almost as low as mine.

I always had low marks so it did not affect at all.
 

Town Heretic

Out of Order
Hall of Fame
Ungodly? Really?
Four times a total that is a bit inflated itself now? Sure, seems apt.

Rep as a measure of popularity
It never was!!!!!
That's just not true, Tam. Like I said, I broke the rep machine and did it without any cadre pumping my numbers, without being a part of any effort to manipulate the number. I simply made a lot of posts that people, left and right, Christian and heathen, found amusing or interesting or liked for whatever reason.

In those days I found that gratifying and because there was always an attempt to manipulate the system going on (mostly involving lengthening or shortening rep cycles) I kept a record for a few years to keep from running into a "can't rep yet" notice. The record had two columns. The first was who gave me rep and the second was a list of people I gave rep to.

I remember when a mod was suspicious early on because I was catching and passing people pretty quickly (as in a year or two after I'd been here) and I invited him to take a look at who was repping me (I think he wondered if my rise was owed to a cadre, there being one or two, but I knew it wasn't because I'd already said no to that sort of thing) and what he found was a mix from Knight to red77.

And for years that's the way it stayed. Sadly, a lot of my right wing friends fell by the wayside and I don't see them around much or at all. MaryContrary, chickenman, etc. I'm probably not nearly as popular as I once was, but you get a sense of things over the years. My reps received has been fairly constant, even if the harder right and left remaining are a little more inclined to keep coloring within their own borders these days.

Really. I don't think he's liked at all outside the hard right. I never read much being said about him that's positive, so I'm guessing his CP page would look like another soots fest, for the most part. Certainly I never had any difficulty in catching and passing him without the manipulation and he'd been here years longer. Now look at him. It's a TOL miracle. :eek:
 

patrick jane

BANNED
Banned
Four times a total that is a bit inflated itself now? Sure, seems apt.

Rep as a measure of popularity

That's just not true, Tam. Like I said, I broke the rep machine and did it without any cadre pumping my numbers, without being a part of any effort to manipulate the number. I simply made a lot of posts that people, left and right, Christian and heathen, found amusing or interesting or liked for whatever reason.

In those days I found that gratifying and because there was always an attempt to manipulate the system going on (mostly involving lengthening or shortening rep cycles) I kept a record for a few years to keep from running into a "can't rep yet" notice. The record had two columns. The first was who gave me rep and the second was a list of people I gave rep to.

I remember when a mod was suspicious early on because I was catching and passing people pretty quickly (as in a year or two after I'd been here) and I invited him to take a look at who was repping me (I think he wondered if my rise was owed to a cadre, there being one or two, but I knew it wasn't because I'd already said no to that sort of thing) and what he found was a mix from Knight to red77.

And for years that's the way it stayed. Sadly, a lot of my right wing friends fell by the wayside and I don't see them around much or at all. MaryContrary, chickenman, etc. I'm probably not nearly as popular as I once was, but you get a sense of things over the years. My reps received has been fairly constant, even if the harder right and left remaining are a little more inclined to keep coloring within their own borders these days.


Really. I don't think he's liked at all outside the hard right. I never read much being said about him that's positive, so I'm guessing his CP page would look like another soots fest, for the most part. Certainly I never had any difficulty in catching and passing him without the manipulation and he'd been here years longer. Now look at him. It's a TOL miracle. :eek:

we heard you the ninth time - you were rep king when reps were real, and you did it fair & square. we know - your legacy is duly noted -
 

Town Heretic

Out of Order
Hall of Fame
we heard you the ninth time
It's not a point of pride for me now, only a point in rebuttal to the notion that the system has to be something else and always was.
- you were rep king when reps were real, and you did it fair & square. we know - your legacy is duly noted -
The point was the fair and square, not the who. I'm the guy who'd just as soon hide the number and let those who want it have it. But that's not an option.
 

Tambora

Get your armor ready!
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
It's almost as funny to watch TH proclaim with a straight face that he only used the rep system in the most noble of ways.

This place is a hoot!
 

patrick jane

BANNED
Banned
It's not a point of pride for me now, only a point in rebuttal to the notion that the system has to be something else and always was.

The point was the fair and square, not the who. I'm the guy who'd just as soon hide the number and let those who want it have it. But that's not an option.

i realize most folks here aren't following this thread and many, like me, don't know the history here. i know only 9 months of viewing and i took a month off, all told.

i was being my smart aleck personality, i haven't heard that 9 times, but 2 or 3 probably -

i understand, because i felt bad going to zero, i would be vocal if i was once on top or top ten etc - i know you reasoning about the fair part and you have valid points -
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top