Maybe you can explain your Rep Thread IV (that was years ago, not sure what number it might be now) and Rep Rampage threads, since Lighthouse can't.
I can explain it right now:
Some people have way too much time on their hands.
Maybe you can explain your Rep Thread IV (that was years ago, not sure what number it might be now) and Rep Rampage threads, since Lighthouse can't.
I can explain it right now:
Some people have way too much time on their hands.
Here's what he said at the outset of the reset:That's just it. It really doesn't represent anything. If you read the thread that Knight initially put up when he implemented the rep system, he basically said as much. People use rep for different things.
...Today we deleted everything and we are starting from scratch....But with a new fresh start it will give a new, more accurate representation of user reputation moving forward.
No, that's what you chose to make it into. I'm noting that when anyone attempts to inorganically grow that number it's aimed at something. Something that must be important to the person willing to adopt a methodology at odds with the point of the term and their and other's normal "organic" approach to it. And that something is dishonest.Sin. You're bringing sin into what is, effectively, a debate about gold star stickers? Really?
Maybe you can explain your Rep Thread IV (that was years ago, not sure what number it might be now) and Rep Rampage threads, since Lighthouse can't.
Well, for one, Anna cares. And I care about Anna. And I will oblige her request.You misunderstand me. What's stupid is that the question even arises. We're talking about little gold star stickers. Who cares? It's utterly insignificant. :nono:
I don't have a rep thread - ive never created one. Lighthouse explained to you what those threads are, and there have been threads like that right in the "and the rest" forum plenty of times too, where it was asked for people to rep the person above them.
If im not mistaken, you even participated in them. Is that the kind of thing you mean?
Ill rep whoever i please, in whatever increments i please, for whatever reason i please, and you can do the same thing cant you?
Nope. I've never participated in them. Those threads are off limits to anyone not in soots, and you know that.
They're in a forum invisible to everyone else.
I can't believe you're being that disingenuous.
Hello, i think you need reread my post. There have been threads made right in the open forum for reps, back when eeset was complaining about reps all the time, saying to rep the person above them.
They were NOT invisible and i know for a fact others here remember them.
PS, i recall several times where i have repped YOU, multiple times in a single day before, did that bother you?
Then show us.Second, yes. I do think there is a member list.
Assume whatever you want, you petulant child.… To pump up your count so you look like the site 'big shots' and can 'punish' and 'reward' people using the rep system. Shallow, tawdry, pathetic, … these are the words that come to mind. But hey, if that's how you roll …
It doesn't change what I sad, either. It also doesn't contradict what I said.1. That's not what you said earlier.
No, you would be kicked out and have a reputation of zero.2. Even so, "should" doesn't equal "does." I could break the rules of the social club left and right (thus the reason, e.g., why the club owners don't like me), but it still be the case that everyone there loves me. Once more, my reputation would still be amazing.
Depends on who holds you in high repute.In point of fact, if you consider actual reputation (i.e., what the people on the board actually think), this is just true. There's probably no correlation between "reputation" and actual reputation.
You can't seriously be that stupid. She was not referring to the threads in SOotS. She was referring to the public threads that were for the same purpose.Nope. I've never participated in them. Those threads are off limits to anyone not in soots, and you know that.
They're in a forum invisible to everyone else.
I can't believe you're being that disingenuous.
Those are NOT the threads I'm talking about. Please don't pretend that they are. I can't respect that.
You can't seriously be that stupid. She was not referring to the threads in SOotS. She was referring to the public threads that were for the same purpose.
They are exactly the same thing as lighthouse explained to you, a thread where we rep each other. Period.
They are exactly the same thing as lighthouse explained to you, a thread where we rep each other.Period.Endlessly.
I don't have a rep thread - ive never created one. Lighthouse explained to you what those threads are, and there have been threads like that right in the "and the rest" forum right out in the open for everyone plenty of times too, where it was asked for people to rep the person above them.
If im not mistaken, you even participated in them. Is that the kind of thing you mean?
Ill rep whoever i please, in whatever increments i please, for whatever reason i please, and you can do the same thing cant you?
PS, i recall several times where i have repped YOU, multiple times in a single day before, did that bother you?
Not since the reset you haven't.
Ask Chrys, he made one of them,
And we can't respect you; because you make it nigh impossible. You are stubborn, and boneheaded, beyond comprehension.Those are NOT the threads I'm talking about. Please don't pretend that they are. I can't respect that.
one what?
A thread to rep each other in. You had one a while back.
Why would i, you are whining like a child over something you have done yourself and benefited from yourself.
Fact, we all have 60 reps a day, we can use them however we want, so can you.