Never pet a dog unless you mean for him to follow you home. Sorry. That should be in the phrases thread.
Trump fires top government lawyer who defied immigration order WASHINGTON, Jan 30 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump fired the federal government's top lawyer Sally Yates on Monday after she took the extraordinarily rare step of defying the White House and refused to defend new travel restrictions targeting seven Muslim-majority nations. Yates said late on Monday that the Justice Department would not defend in court Trump's directive that put a 120-day hold on allowing refugees into the country, an indefinite ban on refugees from Syria and a 90-day bar on citizens from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen. Yates said she did not believe defending the order would be "consistent with this institution's solemn obligation to always seek justice and stand for what is right." Hours later, she was fired. The White House said Yates "has betrayed the Department of Justice by refusing to enforce a legal order designed to protect the citizens of the United States" and portrayed her actions as political. Trump has argued tougher vetting of immigrants is needed to protect America from terror attacks but critics complain that his order unfairly singles out Muslims and defiles America's historic reputation as a welcoming place for immigrants. Yates, an appointee of former Democratic President Barack Obama, was days away from being replaced by Trump's pick for the top spot at the Justice Department, Republican Senator Jeff Sessions, who is awaiting Senate confirmation. "Ms. Yates is an Obama Administration appointee who is weak on borders and very weak on illegal immigration," the White House said in a statement. https://www.yahoo.com/news/backlash-grows-against-trump-travel-002244824.html |
... pray tell what point were you making?
No, I'm simply not in agreement with the revisionist thinking of some on the right. It happens like this, a fellow looking to make waves or sell copy or books makes a statement that attempts to pull the teeth of a bit like that because it has been used against the right often enough to irk them and because the right adores leaning on the founders. Then, after someone like Wittes makes the effort every conservative media outlet runs it up the flagpole until it resembles a settled truth.Town said " No, I can read fairly well and I've read him. "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety".
Looks like you failed to understand what you read because you are misapplying it.
He declared a principle, one that is applicable to the moment. And I wed that application to a foundational truth, that we are a nation founded on the thing so many have chosen to hold in contempt or fear.Franklin was not referring to the loss of liberty of non citizens.
We hold these truths self-evident, that the citizens of our land are endowed...no, wait, that's not how it goes, does it.No citizen has lost any liberty in the issuing of the executive orders.
This country is currently plagued with a bunch of crybabies. They'll eventually simmer down in their cradles
Right again. You should stick to copy. It really helps your averages.Town said " Me either. I also didn't look at the one issue and at the post I made about his falling under 50% approval and find something incongruous in it. You did".
So you say. What was it?I found something incongruous in the point you were trying to drive home.
I was relating an observed truth, that in historic fashion Trump's approval rating has fallen below 50%. That's one heck of a short honeymoon period. I at no point related that to a particular issue, because I think its a general response to how he's handling the office. When you attempted to rest on the one bit I noted that it was unrelated. Why you're still confused about what that means I can't tell you.If you were not making the point that trump has hit rock bottom in his approval very quickly because of his executive orders, pray tell what point were you making?
Town said " No, I'm simply not in agreement with the revisionist thinking of some on the right".
Doser showed you in devastating manner that you and the people you learned from are the revisionists.
... some spoiled rotten school girl on Twitter ...
I didn't watch it.
I'm sure the GOP establishment all looked like the cats who swallowed the canary....
They know Trump is a fraud, but they don't care, they know he's just a puppet.
twitter is for retards
don't be a retard
You're right - don't be a Trumper :chuckle:
Doser rarely showed me anything except his temper and immaturity, a habit that led me to put him on the ignore pile, though I see "This message is hidden because ok doser is on your ignore list" often enough to understand he's following me about like a love sick puppy...if of the rabid variety.Town said " No, I'm simply not in agreement with the revisionist thinking of some on the right".
Doser showed you in devastating manner that you and the people you learned from are the revisionists.
I've spoken to that particular author
town said:... Wittes analysis.
find a valid reason to impeach him and i'll support you 100%...