lol never fake - and neither are you, I notice
The embarrassment of receiving an infraction
- Thread starter Delmar
- Start date
- Status
lol never fake - and neither are you, I notice
They stay on even when the thread has been deleted!
i treat them as hyperlinks to interesting threads :devil:
Please, take a moment here to reread what this poisonous viper has posted. If you cross him you too will become one of his targets.
Absolutely nothing that he posts contains so much as a grain of truth.
But, what can one expect from someone who admittedly wishes to go to Hell so he can watch other souls burn there?
staind.raindrop
New member
We've got a keen one here, folks.
resurrected said:
Ok, maybe i'm not smart either, because that is also confusing...
"...that you can click on to read more or peruse by opening... with rights being reserved'? Reserve which right? Is he suggesting that i use biases? Intentional bias is a foreign language to me.
alwight
New member
Despite any other definitions you may have seen I think TH's usage of "salvo" was more in line with this from Wiki:
"A salvo is the simultaneous discharge of artillery or firearms including the firing of guns either to hit a target or to perform a salute."
(Metaphor for user posts)
staind.raindrop
New member
Either way, is he suggesting i exercise bias? Aren't lawyers supposed to not do that? I am so confused :allsmile:
staind.raindrop
New member
I meant your posts have candour - nothing more
I didn't mean to suggest you did... i'm sorry, you'll have to forgive me; i have aspergers. I'm an aspie cuspie. It's almost like having multiple personalities, but with self control.
:idunno: beats me - i guess they just talk funny down in alabama
you poisonous viper you!
alwight
New member
TH can clearly speak for himself but for me he seems to be only suggesting that you can get a better understanding of certain personalities by examining the evidence of their recent posts.
That's the sort of thing a lawyer might say imo
.
staind.raindrop
New member
ah ok, raindrop - my youngest has aspergers - very bright.
It's a mixed blessing, i suppose :idunno:
Just another way of saying opening bit. I'd thought most people would have heard of an opening salvo as a part of debate. Don't worry about it. The point is you'll see the beginnings of posts, unless they're really short. Try it and you'll see.
Only in that narrow noggin of yours, which while the world to you is not so much to me and I doubt is more to most.
What he doesn't do is provide a link. The reason he doesn't do this is because he's freeing it from context, a context that would illustrate it isn't an expression of ego, but a serious attempt to demonstrate the problem with another posters insular logic.
It wasn't any of those things, though your mischaracterization is funny, as was your exit shaking fist at how a few of us had made TOL a place you didn't want to be, until you crept back in under another name then in short order started spewing out nearly a hundred posts a day for God knows how long.
No, it was closer to two...two very good months in most ways, as it turned out...how long were you gone again?
No, that wasn't it. That's just the narrative you run in that frustrated noggin of yours.
Which doesn't deny your essential humanity. It places a value on what you've done with it.
Your problem and the likely foundation of it has been spoken to.
You're looking forward to watching Rusha suffer. I think you're a sad human being for that...and for other, equally odious reasons, like your use of your faith to advance malice.
And so the fellow who attempts to insinuate a poster on my part of superiority never gets around to realizing how at every turn he promotes his own sense of self entitlement.
But who were they, really? I don't think much of silent alleged majorities. They're frequently little more than phantoms and/or equally bruised and likened minds.
Friends all and those who have taken strong exception to a number of my posits over the years. You'd see that as an enemy action, no doubt.
No, for the longest time anna didn't even see you for what you are, but your Balzacian turn was a real help. But now and again one of them, bybee most of all, will see something vulgar and dishonest and point it out, as friends also do.
I don't care that you post, it's what you post that's the problem and why (see: your stalker infraction). And my getting over myself isn't the problem with your posts. The problem is that you don't seem to be able to get over me.
I think that about sums you up in approach and the why is almost as self evident.
I think she was referencing you chiming in after some of Res' horsefeather misdirection and defamatory bile and saw it as an affirmation of the slant.
I'd say the same thing to you as I did to staind. Click on his username. When the drop down menu comes up click on posts and then take a look at what he tends to do around here. Feel equally free with my posts.
It's a good way to see patterns.
- Status