i have been all along but in protestant 66 book bible quoteswhy don't you talk about tulip?
you couldnt see the conection cause to pope told you not to
i have been all along but in protestant 66 book bible quoteswhy don't you talk about tulip?
the church is the largest organization in the worldJesus thought it important enough to discuss multiple times, and the apostles thought it important enough to write down and echo in their teachings to the early Church, but the Roman Catholic Church does not consider it important, so it's not? Or you don't think it's important, so it's not? Or am I completely misunderstanding?
If I'm not misunderstanding, I'm left with a hierarchical church structure telling me that the portions of scripture indicating Jesus and the apostles were against a hierarchical church structure are not important therefore we can focus on more important things and essentially ignore them.
the church is the largest organization in the world
over one billion members
over 37,000 priests
over 17,000 parishes
over 6,000 schools
over 500 hospitals
so you were wondering about hierarchy?
how would you handle a flock this big?
the church is the largest organization in the world
over one billion members
over 37,000 priests
over 17,000 parishes
over 6,000 schools
over 500 hospitals
so you were wondering about hierarchy?
how would you handle a flock this big?
I wouldn't.
If my picture I'm forming from my study is correct, I'd trust the Holy Spirit to handle that flock as expressed through thousands of groups of elders across the cities of the world.
Who is the head of the Church?
the pope
I'm hoping you have the intellectual integrity to affirm the truth as taught by Christ's one historic Catholic Church.you're hoping we're stupid enough to go back
That's like a 1st-century skeptic asking what happens when the apostles are heretical, or when the apostles' canonical writings contain formal doctrinal error. The question itself is internally flawed.What happens when a Pope is heretical?
That's like a 1st-century skeptic asking what happens when the apostles are heretical, or when the apostles' canonical writings contain formal doctrinal error. The question itself is internally flawed.
Is the body of Christ different than the Church?
Can you provide an example of a pope who declared himself "heretical," and cite your source?What about Popes who declared themselves to be heretical?
I'm hoping you have the intellectual integrity to affirm the truth as taught by Christ's one historic Catholic Church.
The bishops are the successors of the apostles, and the Bishop of Rome (the Pope) in particular is the successor of St. Peter. [SOURCE] [SOURCE]The Popes are not successors of Peter...
Judas Iscariot was dead immediately after the Resurrection, and so never appointed or ordained any successors. Your vast ignorance is noted once again....but rather of Judas Iscariot
Roman Catholics interpret Matthew 16:18 to mean that Peter is the rock on which the church is built. That interpretation then becomes the basis for the doctrine of papal succession. But is that what Jesus meant when He declared, "Upon this rock I will build My church"?
my theory is that you took a step in the wrong direction and joined a cult. a fatal stepwhen God changes someone's name, pay attention, it is important -
do you have a theory as to why simon's name became peter?
yes -
we are all part of the body of Christ -
you don't have to be catholic -
the church is a body of knowledge, the truth -
closely guarded by the pope and his bishops -
they are the ones who gave you the bible -
they are the ones who guide us in this modern world -
when God changes someone's name, pay attention, it is important -
do you have a theory as to why simon's name became peter?
That do be overly pedantic, but Saul did NOT "become" Paul.Why did Saul become Paul?