SUPREME COURT EXTENDS GAY MARRIAGE NATIONWIDE
- Thread starter Nathon Detroit
- Start date
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Well you best take that up with the state then, as when two people marry it's their personal choice to make such a commitment and is recognized under law, regardless of faith or lack thereof etc.
In your "world view" it would seem no couple can get married unless they're Christians? If that's the case then you have no business supporting non Christian adulterers being put to death if the marriage dissolves as they were never 'technically' married to begin with? Or else what?
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Oh change the record puhleeeeeze...
It's like hearing a Take That song on a loop.
Bad enough the first time around...
Nazaroo
New member
Unfortunately, you lose some 'rights' when you commit crimes.
You lose dignity when you deny dignity to God who condemns sodomy.
So its impossible for everyone to have the same rights and dignity.
True
Not true. Fallacy of appeal to authority. Your logic fails therefore your argument fails.
No you godless perverted heathen. The state can declare whatever it wants, they are not one flesh.
Go to hell you pervert.
Quetzal
New member
Your opinion on the matter has been made perfectly clear. Thank you.
Quetzal
New member
Another textbook example of ad hominem in lieu of any argument.
Why?
Except for those who do not want to bake a cake. They get dragged through the courts and fined.
Are you being truthful and completely honest? A good Christian is completely honest.
There was no fine by a court. There was an award made to the gay couple by a human rights tribunal. There is a difference. And accuracy matters.
Do you support discrimination in any other cases?
This much we agree on.
They aren't one flesh, aren't married in the eyes of God.
But like the atheist and Hindu who proceeded them, they have entered into a marriage contract before the state. That is all the law is concerned with and no one outside of the Body can harm the value of what happens within the Body when a man and a woman marry there.
It is of God, whether or not a couple choose to involve the state at all.
So it will never make sense, the outrage being poured out over this decision that was and has been lacking for generations in regard to everyone else outside of the Body who routinely marry by contract and under seal of the state and with no greater moral claim on the institution than homosexuals.
Would you care to explain how, exactly, Jesus would have condemned her?
You would love Iran or Saudi Arabia then.
They have the same viewpoint as you, that religion is more important than government of the people and for the people. For all the people.
It is not religion that is more important, but rather God.
Yeah, that's their view. And they have exactly the same amount of scientific evidence for their god as you have for yours.