glorydaz
Well-known member
That's because he thinks he gets to make up the rules for both sides, including trying to limit answers to either yes or no. We had another poster who tried to do that. :think:
Stand for the Second Amendment
- Thread starter jzeidler
- Start date
That's because he thinks he gets to make up the rules for both sides, including trying to limit answers to either yes or no. We had another poster who tried to do that. :think:
Danoh does his best work when he's on ignore and nobody can see what he's saying.
glorydaz
Well-known member
Maybe. He certainly isn't very knowledgable about the realities in this country.
Perhaps he's a return guest under the guise of another name?
glorydaz
Well-known member
He's starving for attention as usual.
I placed him on my 'Eggnore list,' long ago.
I NEVER liked Danoh for some reason.
eider
Well-known member
Wow...... imagine just how much worse these shootings would be if tommy guns would be available to all?
eider
Well-known member
Excellent........... mandatory gun safes would protect from so many crimes, accidents and possibly suicides.
This wonderful news.
Moving forward, how about a mandatory Health and Safety with guns course as part of any licence application?
And you do need all risks gun insurance..... definitely. The accident levels are just huge, I understand.
This is getting easier by the post............
eider
Well-known member
I see thatr you're beginning to glimpse how this could actually work....... you see, insurance for a fast-fire semi-auto gun would probably be huge, whereas a sporting rifle or revolver would probably attract a much smaller premium.
I can see that you're getting there..... slowly.
[QUOTE}Are you an insurance salesman or something?
The world of litigation is already way out of bounds. :kookoo:[/QUOTE]
Insurance is not the same as litigation.
It looks to me as if you haven't ever thought of taking out even third party risks for all your guns........ very irresponsible, you know.
Do you have car insurance? It's not so stupid to require insurance when accidents can cause such huge damages claims. If you got shot by accident I'll bet that you'd be wanting to sue for damages, but if the person who caused the accident isn't insured it's going to be a tough old job getting paid out for all those hospital fees, etc......
eider
Well-known member
You don't need to be smart to figure out that guns do need controlling, when there have been 21 mass shootings just in May, and May isn't over yet.
eider
Well-known member
But you're smarter than that!
I've never had to return as another name because so far I've never been outed.
Now...... back to the thread.......... have you anything that you'd like to say about the average 80 deaths per day that are caused by guns?
Do you think that the 2nd amendment intended folks to be armed with modern fast-fire guns?
That's a starter......
glorydaz
Well-known member
Did you see the word "mandatory" in my post? Nope, you didn't.
Nope, just a regular background check....like they have now is sufficient.
No, I don't need insurance on my guns.
My guns are very well behaved.
The "accident levels" are not "huge".
:thumb:
Guns don't need to control themselves, people do. And, good luck with that.
Do a mandatory gun confiscation and watch what happens:
Bad guys will purchase them from the 'Black market.'
Guns will be sold out of the trunks of cars.
Bad guys will soon realize that good guys can't protect themselves.
Bad guys will use knives, trucks, vans, pipe bombs, poison, etc.
Bad guys will purchase them from the 'Black market.'
Guns will be sold out of the trunks of cars.
Bad guys will soon realize that good guys can't protect themselves.
Bad guys will use knives, trucks, vans, pipe bombs, poison, etc.
Insurance is not the same as litigation.
It looks to me as if you haven't ever thought of taking out even third party risks for all your guns........ very irresponsible, you know.
Do you have car insurance? It's not so stupid to require insurance when accidents can cause such huge damages claims. If you got shot by accident I'll bet that you'd be wanting to sue for damages, but if the person who caused the accident isn't insured it's going to be a tough old job getting paid out for all those hospital fees, etc......[/QUOTE]
I'll bet you really don't understand how DUMB you sound? That must be difficult for you?
Then, how about some good old fashion 'Grenade launchers?'
Guns were used to free America from the tyranny of King George and Great Britain. Guns are used to protect American homes. Guns will protect our nation if its citizens are threatened by a tyrannical future government. Perhaps, from some type of far-left coup, etc. Just an example.