I agree with this statement.
With the law of averages being what they are, I was bound to get something right after all this time.
Sent from my SM-G9250 using TOL mobile app
I agree with this statement.
My concern is that we should not condemn a man solely because his affiliation is Muslim.
I was never calling for condemnation.
You seem oddly satisfied by that instead of appalled. I find that appalling.Well well. How does that feel, Muslims, when someone attacks folks out of the blue that are going about their daily lives?
No he didn't. He said the attempt was made to divide the populace and and to "make us stop leading the lives that we do." Reminds me of a conservative not terribly long ago who was applauded for suggesting that when we don't do that terrorism wins.Clearly this was a self-radicalized lone wolf. Anyway, the London mayor said this is just part of living in a modern city and that people shouldn’t get upset over it. It is what it is.
What the heck does white have to do with it? Was he some sort of white separatist? There are white Muslims. And there are pale, blue-eyed Spaniards. Much of the world understands that, because they live in areas where much more diverse populations tend to break down that sort of assumption.But I’m very concerned about the backlash against the white community.
God bless the effort. It's hard to keep your sanity with so much insanity all about you.Everybody is...... We'll stand together and we'll stand by the innocent Muslim folks of London and the UK.
It'll take time but I expect we'll hear more about the terrorist soon enough.
Was it the grammar? lain: It was the grammar, wasn't it.Well, I did write a play once.
It wasn't very well received though for some reason...:mmph:
There's someone across the pond thinking the same thing about your faith and you. And he's just as wrong.Unfortunately, the facts bear out that islam is a dangerous fake religion
You seem oddly satisfied by that instead of appalled. I find that appalling.
Way to underscore the point of your reading just about any thread.i find your appallment oddly satisfying
No he didn't. He said the attempt was made to divide the populace and and to "make us stop leading the lives that we do." Reminds me of a conservative not terribly long ago who was applauded for suggesting that when we don't do that terrorism wins.
Way to underscore the point of your reading just about any thread.
Find it? You could read a newspaper over my shoulder.
I can read mine with you standing between me and it.
Anything on terrorism (in case he didn't have time to look at the topic)? This one's about "reverse terrorism".
Really? Were any of them on point?i've made 14 posts in this thread, town
It's your inability to make reasoned cases that undoes the effort.i make one in response to you and you come unglued
I think if you removed the smilies, 9 out of 10 people would never see the amusement. I mean instead of the 7 or 8 in 10 who probably still aren't buying it.quite amusing to watch, actually :chuckle:
I believe you're one of the least happy and satisfied posters I've ever read around here.and oddly satisfying :chuckle:
Seriously though, terrorism. You come down for or against?
Hi... again.... and 'yes', we will... stand together. We're just too cosmopolitan, too multi-cultural, to do anything else. We (mostly) wouldn't want to do anything else.God bless the effort. It's hard to keep your sanity with so much insanity all about you.
Wot? Look mate, Arfa's grandma ain't got nuffin' to do wiv 'is natral artstandin' genic, umm, ginui, err..... yer knows wot I meanin', innit.Was it the grammar? lain: It was the grammar, wasn't it.
The mayor (thanks to Trump) was completely taken out of context, and Trump's base ran with the mischaracterization you're answering.
Trump:
Mayor Sadiq Khan's actual words:
"At least seven dead and 48 wounded in terror attack and mayor of London says there is "no reason to be alarmed!"
"Londoners will see an increased police presence today [Sunday] and over the course of the next few days. No reason to be alarmed."
I'm not surprised by any point scoring against the London Mayor.
But, most sadly, Sadiq Khan has looked a bit inadequate as far as handling the shocking terrorism, and the unbelievably criminal inferno at Glenfell Tower.
Last night he made a statement on the News, explaining how London was responding and reacting to that towering inferno. His short speech was layed flat on a desk in front of him, and he peered down at it, reading line for line like a schoolboy in a dictation exercise. I felt like shouting at the telly, 'For goodness sake, look up, man'!
Anna, he's just looking quite pathetic at this time, under these dreadful pressures, but after having a very tough Mayor for several years, I'm afraid that we've been spoiled by a rock solid character like tatty-hair Boris.
I hope Sadiq picks up his game, because I for one would love to thumb my nose at the islamophobes, and conservatives!
Understood.I can imagine your frustration, since we have our own versions of inadequate leaders here starting with our current inhabitant of the Oval Office...
Look.... absolutely!Having said that, the job in front of him is incredible daunting. If I'm remembering correctly, you may have hundreds of buildings across London with that cladding, all installed before the mayor took office? So it's on him now to oversee this crisis he's inherited while dealing with several terror attacks and protecting you from another.
Yes..... Let's wish him all the best.I hope he's able to make the transition from lawyer to commander, he needs to be able to inspire confidence in the citizens and show them he's a capable leader and a master delegator, because if he can't do it, the people will find someone who will. I wish him the all the best. It's not a job I would want.
The one person who did look big enough was the Metroplitan Police assistant Commissioner whose job it was in the first days to give daily reports to an angry and aggressive media..... he handled it all so well, by comparison.
Hey - maybe the mayor needs to reassign the commissioner. Can he do that? Get him on his team and make him the public face of the operation.
From what I've gathered that cladding would not be on a building in the U.S.It's the most embarrassing and shameful situation ......... and we now know that there are about one hundred tower blocks which need very careful re-inspection.
It's the most embarrassing and shameful situation ......... and we now know that there are about one hundred tower blocks which need very careful re-inspection.
From what I've gathered that cladding would not be on a building in the U.S.
You have lax building codes.
And really dumb stickers.
Your country is going through a lot right now. I hope that those in positions to do so come together and solve these problems. When everyone works to a purpose that's a greater than the sum of the differences, good things will happen. I hope that for you and yours.