There has not yet been a thorough audit in which the auditors were given access to all the records they requested. An abbreviated audit that does not examine all the evidence cannot possibly verify that no fraud occurred.
Republicans cancel Liz Cheney
- Thread starter annabenedetti
- Start date
You maintain that you have not seen evidence of fraud. I have seen plenty of evidence. Your ignorance of the evidence is not proof that no evidence exists.
8 I
All men are not born equal. Some are smart and some not smart at all. Dumb people think differences in levels of intelligence is racist. That is stupid.
Courts have thrown out voter fraud cases for all sorts of reasons, none of which was due to investigations having proven beyond doubt that no voter fraud occurred.
Which is a conspiracy theory:
1. Fauci funded the Wuhan lab, or 2. Fauci did not find the Wuhan lab?
Or, which was a conspiracy theory:
1. Hunter Biden funneled American aid money through Ukrainian mobsters back to Joe Biden, or 2. Hunter did not benefit from Ukrainian gangsters' illegal handling of US aid to Ukraine?
Democrats have been fairly successful at hiding the facts of their fraud from lazy and ignorant Americans, but not all Americans are buying into their lies.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
That they will.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Understand and agree. But when we get to the point that no one wants to reach anyone, it'll be war.
Charlie Kirk Gets Asked at TPUSA Event: ‘How Many Elections Are They Gonna Steal Before We Kill These People?’
Charlie Kirk was asked when “we get to use the guns” to “kill these people” over baseless election fraud claims.
"At this point, we’re living under corporate and medical fascism. This is tyranny. When do we get to use the guns? No, and I’m not — that’s not a joke," asked the audience member. "I’m not saying it like that. I mean, literally, where’s the line? How many elections are they going to steal before we kill these people?"
Last edited:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Sure do because I ain't some numpty who buys into bonkers conspiracy theories for starters.When you recount the ballots you have, the number doesn't change.
Looks like you missed the reason for the investigation.
Also, this case hasn't been thrown out. It just started.
But Brain knows better.
Here, let's break this down for you a bit as to when this started and how such came about. Dial back to the night when the election results started coming in and after a few hours El Trumpo decided to hold a briefing declaring himself the victor. Now, this was flat out dumb but entirely in keeping with his petulant and narcissistic personality. He knew that things weren't looking good, his team would have made him aware of that as they'd know that despite an initial lead in several states, that would be overturned and/or severely diminished the following day once the mail in ballots were counted. This was forecast on news outlets everywhere and such came about.
So, what recourse does such a petulant manchild have but to start bleating on about fraud once the results became more than obvious? Not much really. It was obvious he wasn't going to go gracefully so there we have it. He even claims that he's "your favourite president" despite the fact that he's actually regarded as one of the worst to ever hold office. Still, unfortunately, there's plenty who bought into his bunk and lapped it all up despite it being completely farcical. The whole thing has been a global laughing stock and a satirist's dream Stripe.
But hey, you cling to the conspiracy if ya like. It suits ya!
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
That's where this ridiculous farce ceases to be amusing.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
They didn't. Simple as that. That's why the results have been certified long ago and these silly audits have only confirmed it. It's also why sane republicans are fed up of the ongoing embarrassing nonsense.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
A lot of deranged people out there.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Just pathetic.
Of course you are. You think that joebiden won last year's US election fair and square.
Did you know that a level playing field would require the establishment media and big tech not to collude on action to favor the former VP?
Last edited:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Yup, cos none credible has been shown. Stuff that whets the appetite of those already mired in conspiracy garbage don't count. Also debunked all over the place as well...
You mean like the just-announced investigation in Wisconsin? The one that started a day ago? The one that has been "debunked" already? Debunked "all over the place"?
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Oh dear. Still can't understand what constitutes a conspiracy theory or those who adhere to such then?
Do you need it explaining in large or coloured font? Bolded or in italics perhaps?
I'll start with bold:
I am with the prevailing consensus that Biden legitimately won the 2020 election. Therefore I can't be a conspiracy theorist on the matter because to be so would require me to be at odds with that.
Now hey, if you want to continue with this then do carry on if you want. There's some entertainment value at least when pompous blowhards double down on a glaring blunder and end up making themselves look even more silly after all...
Yeah, you might have a semantic point. Call it an off-suit ace.
You're betting the house with that?
I call! I call!
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Yes Stripe, that one. What did you think I meant? The one from four or five days ago? Read up on this earlier and there's no danger of fraud being uncovered, certainly not the sort you want. You are aware of that right?
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Then you lose cos comparatively I've got a royal flush...Yeah, you might have a semantic point. Call it an off-suit ace.
You're betting the house with that?
I call! I call!
Don't play poker whatever ya do. Don't teach English anymore either if you can't understand basic terminology.