Against your naked ace?
Two pair, pudding head. Eights over sixes.
You name the time and place and we'll set up a table.
Settle this once and for all.
Republicans cancel Liz Cheney
- Thread starter annabenedetti
- Start date
Against your naked ace?
Two pair, pudding head. Eights over sixes.
Settle this once and for all.
Venezuelans did not use guns to stop Chavez and his communist takeover. I doubt Christians will take up guns against the communists in America either. Let God sort it all out. He is not fooled for one second by wicked lies of deranged rebels against God.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Well, naked in itself but surrounded by family, sure.Against your naked ace?
Two pair, pudding head. Eights over sixes.
You name the time and place and we'll set up a table.
Settle this once and for all.
Already settled. You still don't even understand what a conspiracy theory is let alone how to play poker.
I don't want anything. I couldn't care less who the US president is. Zero cares.
The issue here is that you spout nothing but obvious nonsense. When called on it you turn to obfuscation, diversion and semantic games.
We would love a sensible discussion, but you're anathema to it.
Democrats always begin the "conspiracy theory" chants when investigators are hot on the trail of exposing democrat wrongdoing. Take the midnight assassination of Seth Rich, for example, who was ambushed on a city street in DC and left for dead. When rational Americans saw a connection between Rich and the movement of DNC emails to Assange they prodded the DC police to investigate that connection. The DC police did not investigate that connection but, instead, called such a connection a "conspiracy theory."
The DC police never solved the case and nobody should allow them to dismiss key suspects just because they do not want those suspects being suspects.
The votes were certified in a rush but never proven to have been 100% valid. The JFK/LBJ ticket won Texas by fraud but since the vote was certified in a rush the government officials claimed no investigation could then be done. Some precincts had reported more votes for the democrats than they had residents living in those precincts.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Oh sure ya don't. That's why you've prattled on so much about how those who accept the results of the last election are insane and even conspiracy theorists...
You're hilarious at times and if only you were capable of the latter. Still, thanks for the laugh!
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Um, no they weren't and your ongoing spiel is beyond boring now...
Republicans are threatened every day and should take the threats seriously since democrats prove they will carry out their violent threats. Hardly anyone who threatens a democrat ever carries out his threat unless the criminal making the threat is also a democrat.
You got that right. Here is just one of the thousands of crazies who never stop advocating violence:
Waters calls for protesters to 'get more confrontational' if no guilty verdict is reached in Derek Chauvin trial
Rep. Maxine Waters on Saturday night called for protesters to "stay on the street" and "get more confrontational" if former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin is acquitted in the killing of George Floyd.
"We got to stay on the street. And we've got to get more active, we've got to get more confrontational. We've got to make sure that they know that we mean business," she said.
Asked about the curfew put in place, Waters said, "I don't think anything about curfew. Curfew means I want you all to stop talking. I want you to stop meeting. I want you to stop gathering. I don't agree with that."
The congresswoman's comments come at a particularly fraught time in the nation's history. Closing arguments are underway in Chauvin's trial, and protests continue over the killing of Wright. Authorities have ramped up security around Minneapolis, with crews installing razor wire around some police buildings and National Guard troops have been deployed in parts of the city's downtown.
On a K,8,6 board?
Learn to deal with reality. You lost that one. There's always the next hand.
Are you still on that bandwagon? A conspiracy is a few people with a secret, usually criminal, plan. A conspiracy theorist is someone who thinks that such a group exists.
You accuse us of being conspiracy theorists when we point at big tech and the media -- entire companies with budgets the size of midsize nations and large workforces.
We accuse you of the same sort of thing as a bit of a joke. But you miss the point and seize on the chance to rant about pointless semantics.
You got called and were holding A9o. Not even a flush draw.
Next hand, please.
Millions of democrat cultists tanding on soapboxes and chanting "There was no fraud!" will never prove by deep-dive investigations that millions of mysterious late-night ballot dumps for Biden were legitimate votes.
Conspiracy? Lt. Col Vindman meets with Adam Schiff behind closed doors prior to the mysterious introduction of the anonymous whistleblower who claims he heard Trump commit treason. Never mind the whistleblower accuser cannot be cross-examined as required by law because democrats suspended due process in order to obtain a conviction on the strength of a party-line vote, not on the facts.Oh dear. Still can't understand what constitutes a conspiracy theory or those who adhere to such then?
Do you need it explaining in large or coloured font? Bolded or in italics perhaps?
I'll start with bold:
I am with the prevailing consensus that Biden legitimately won the 2020 election. Therefore I can't be a conspiracy theorist on the matter because to be so would require me to be at odds with that.
Now hey, if you want to continue with this then do carry on if you want. There's some entertainment value at least when pompous blowhards double down on a glaring blunder and end up making themselves look even more silly after all...
Probably a Fed.You got that right. Here is just one of the thousands of crazies who never stop advocating violence:
Waters calls for protesters to 'get more confrontational' if no guilty verdict is reached in Derek Chauvin trial
Rep. Maxine Waters on Saturday night called for protesters to "stay on the street" and "get more confrontational" if former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin is acquitted in the killing of George Floyd.www.cnn.com
"We got to stay on the street. And we've got to get more active, we've got to get more confrontational. We've got to make sure that they know that we mean business," she said.
Asked about the curfew put in place, Waters said, "I don't think anything about curfew. Curfew means I want you all to stop talking. I want you to stop meeting. I want you to stop gathering. I don't agree with that."
The congresswoman's comments come at a particularly fraught time in the nation's history. Closing arguments are underway in Chauvin's trial, and protests continue over the killing of Wright. Authorities have ramped up security around Minneapolis, with crews installing razor wire around some police buildings and National Guard troops have been deployed in parts of the city's downtown.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Oh, I already deal with reality dude, like acknowledging that Biden is legitimately president just as I did when Trump won back in 2016. Now don't smart cos you were called on a hand that wasn't even Ace high or carry on pretending that you weren't serious with your lamentable ignorance regarding what constitutes actual conspiracy theory if you like. Your posts are still there for all to see.On a K,8,6 board?
Learn to deal with reality. You lost that one. There's always the next hand.
Are you still on that bandwagon? A conspiracy is a few people with a secret, usually criminal, plan. A conspiracy theorist is someone who thinks that such a group exists.
You accuse us of being conspiracy theorists when we point at big tech and the media -- entire companies with budgets the size of midsize nations and large workforces.
We accuse you of the same sort of thing as a bit of a joke. But you miss the point and seize on the chance to rant about pointless semantics.
You got called and were holding A9o. Not even a flush draw.
Next hand, please.
You'd be better off folding except you already have. Still funny though!
Here is a bit of history for those who believe democrats never commit voter fraud:
Worried About a Rigged Election? Here’s One Way to Handle It
Why the GOP should pay attention to Nixon vs. Kennedy, 1960. <br />
Johnson had almost certainly been involved in fishy elections before. In 1941, LBJ very likely out-polled his primary opponent in a special Senate election, only to see his political enemies steal the election in a classic case of ballot-box stuffing that dragged on for days on end. Seven years later, Johnson returned the favor in what was almost certainly a rigged election. Days after the election, officials in Precinct 13, Jim Wells county, discovered 200 uncounted votes, cast by voters who mysteriously signed in by alphabetical order, all in the same handwriting. It was the most egregious example of widespread, systematic fraud, most pronounced in counties under the thumb of Johnson’s political ally, George Parr. Caro has argued convincingly that Johnson’s team won by dubious means.
To be fair, nobody’s hands were clean in the 1948 Senate election. But if anyone was capable of manipulating the returns in Texas, it was Lyndon Johnson. In 1960, Precinct 13 returned 1,144 votes for John Kennedy and just 45 for Richard Nixon. The Democrats carried Webb County by a lopsided margin of 10,059 to 1,802. In total, Kennedy-Johnson won the nine counties that Parr and his allies controlled by 21,691 votes.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Here's a wake up call for those like yourself who seem to "think" that those like myself are unaware of the history of political chicanery. Loads of it through the ages from all sides of the spectrum. Got that now? Oh good.Here is a bit of history for those who believe democrats never commit voter fraud:
Worried About a Rigged Election? Here’s One Way to Handle It
Why the GOP should pay attention to Nixon vs. Kennedy, 1960. <br />www.politico.com
Johnson had almost certainly been involved in fishy elections before. In 1941, LBJ very likely out-polled his primary opponent in a special Senate election, only to see his political enemies steal the election in a classic case of ballot-box stuffing that dragged on for days on end. Seven years later, Johnson returned the favor in what was almost certainly a rigged election. Days after the election, officials in Precinct 13, Jim Wells county, discovered 200 uncounted votes, cast by voters who mysteriously signed in by alphabetical order, all in the same handwriting. It was the most egregious example of widespread, systematic fraud, most pronounced in counties under the thumb of Johnson’s political ally, George Parr. Caro has argued convincingly that Johnson’s team won by dubious means.
To be fair, nobody’s hands were clean in the 1948 Senate election. But if anyone was capable of manipulating the returns in Texas, it was Lyndon Johnson. In 1960, Precinct 13 returned 1,144 votes for John Kennedy and just 45 for Richard Nixon. The Democrats carried Webb County by a lopsided margin of 10,059 to 1,802. In total, Kennedy-Johnson won the nine counties that Parr and his allies controlled by 21,691 votes.
Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait a minute. Hold on.
You're calling with ace high now?!
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
This is precious. We have to set up a game.
Oh, don't you worry about that. I've got the html saved, screenshots of every page and waybackmachine archives of this thread.
Wot?
Anyway. Fold 2 pair? No way. Not on this flop. This is probably the best hand I'll get dealt all evening.
Congratulations. You recognize democrats have a long history of voter fraud.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Your best hand is a 7 2 off suit? Okay then.Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait a minute. Hold on.
You're calling with ace high now?!
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
This is precious. We have to set up a game.
Oh, don't you worry about that. I've got the html saved, screenshots of every page and waybackmachine archives of this thread.
Wot?
Anyway. Fold 2 pair? No way. Not on this flop. This is probably the best hand I'll get dealt all evening.
Bored now...