Shasta
Well-known member
I never said the scriptures weren't inspired. I said we are not Israel.
IF the OT are "scriptures" and inspired then, according to Paul, they are profitable to use for doctrine (or was that written just for Timothy?). I am doing just that -using them to guide me on matters of doctrine. You are denying the teaching on the ground that the OT reference was not specifically addressed to us (though we were not even born yet). Neither was the application of those verses solely focused on Israel. They were a description of how God deals with nations.
Following your reasoning the Psalms cannot be referred to in matters of truth since they were not about us but about the experience of David, Asaph and Ezra and "we are not them" They were all Jews who lived in a different time and era. As for the TORAH - it was written to Israel. We are not ancient Israel. The prophets were written to a lot of people who "are not us" Perhaps you like the mid-acts dispensationalists think the Gospels were only for that mini-dispensation and that the non-Pauline writings of the NT were for the Jewish believers. When you have finished applying your method the term "inspired" is very hollow. Most of the Bible ends up being history. The OT becomes a fossil, the mere shell of something that was once living fit now only for the museum. The most liberal theologian could do no more damage to the credibility of the Word than you do.
There was not expiration date on Jeremiah 18. God was speaking about how He deals with nations in general. There is absolutely no reason to suppose that He has changed His methods and unless you can provide scriptures to that effect I am going to suppose you have taken this position because you do not like the truth revealed in Jeremiah which is a more serious problem. On the other hand perhaps it is easier for you to post quick one-liners than to offer a thoughtful answer.
We do not reject or disqualify part of the word when it does not fit into our paradigms. We adjust our paradigm to fit the scriptures. This is what all serious exegetes have done. It was the chief activity of the Reformers none of whom would venture to say anything like what you have. Evidently you do not follow their lead so much as I thought.
Last edited: